Cargando…
Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study)
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the assessment of lesions suspicious of melanoma, but few clinical studies have been conducted. We validated the accuracy of an open-source, non-commercial AI algorithm for melanoma diagnosis and assessed its potential impact on de...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00872-1 |
_version_ | 1785071637427650560 |
---|---|
author | Marchetti, Michael A. Cowen, Emily A. Kurtansky, Nicholas R. Weber, Jochen Dauscher, Megan DeFazio, Jennifer Deng, Liang Dusza, Stephen W. Haliasos, Helen Halpern, Allan C. Hosein, Sharif Nazir, Zaeem H. Marghoob, Ashfaq A. Quigley, Elizabeth A. Salvador, Trina Rotemberg, Veronica M. |
author_facet | Marchetti, Michael A. Cowen, Emily A. Kurtansky, Nicholas R. Weber, Jochen Dauscher, Megan DeFazio, Jennifer Deng, Liang Dusza, Stephen W. Haliasos, Helen Halpern, Allan C. Hosein, Sharif Nazir, Zaeem H. Marghoob, Ashfaq A. Quigley, Elizabeth A. Salvador, Trina Rotemberg, Veronica M. |
author_sort | Marchetti, Michael A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the assessment of lesions suspicious of melanoma, but few clinical studies have been conducted. We validated the accuracy of an open-source, non-commercial AI algorithm for melanoma diagnosis and assessed its potential impact on dermatologist decision-making. We conducted a prospective, observational clinical study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the AI algorithm (ADAE) in predicting melanoma from dermoscopy skin lesion images. The primary aim was to assess the reliability of ADAE’s sensitivity at a predefined threshold of 95%. Patients who had consented for a skin biopsy to exclude melanoma were eligible. Dermatologists also estimated the probability of melanoma and indicated management choices before and after real-time exposure to ADAE scores. All lesions underwent biopsy. Four hundred thirty-five participants were enrolled and contributed 603 lesions (95 melanomas). Participants had a mean age of 59 years, 54% were female, and 96% were White individuals. At the predetermined 95% sensitivity threshold, ADAE had a sensitivity of 96.8% (95% CI: 91.1–98.9%) and specificity of 37.4% (95% CI: 33.3–41.7%). The dermatologists’ ability to assess melanoma risk significantly improved after ADAE exposure (AUC 0.7798 vs. 0.8161, p = 0.042). Post-ADAE dermatologist decisions also had equivalent or higher net benefit compared to biopsying all lesions. We validated the accuracy of an open-source melanoma AI algorithm and showed its theoretical potential for improving dermatology experts’ ability to evaluate lesions suspicious of melanoma. Larger randomized trials are needed to fully evaluate the potential of adopting this AI algorithm into clinical workflows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103384832023-07-14 Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) Marchetti, Michael A. Cowen, Emily A. Kurtansky, Nicholas R. Weber, Jochen Dauscher, Megan DeFazio, Jennifer Deng, Liang Dusza, Stephen W. Haliasos, Helen Halpern, Allan C. Hosein, Sharif Nazir, Zaeem H. Marghoob, Ashfaq A. Quigley, Elizabeth A. Salvador, Trina Rotemberg, Veronica M. NPJ Digit Med Article The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the assessment of lesions suspicious of melanoma, but few clinical studies have been conducted. We validated the accuracy of an open-source, non-commercial AI algorithm for melanoma diagnosis and assessed its potential impact on dermatologist decision-making. We conducted a prospective, observational clinical study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the AI algorithm (ADAE) in predicting melanoma from dermoscopy skin lesion images. The primary aim was to assess the reliability of ADAE’s sensitivity at a predefined threshold of 95%. Patients who had consented for a skin biopsy to exclude melanoma were eligible. Dermatologists also estimated the probability of melanoma and indicated management choices before and after real-time exposure to ADAE scores. All lesions underwent biopsy. Four hundred thirty-five participants were enrolled and contributed 603 lesions (95 melanomas). Participants had a mean age of 59 years, 54% were female, and 96% were White individuals. At the predetermined 95% sensitivity threshold, ADAE had a sensitivity of 96.8% (95% CI: 91.1–98.9%) and specificity of 37.4% (95% CI: 33.3–41.7%). The dermatologists’ ability to assess melanoma risk significantly improved after ADAE exposure (AUC 0.7798 vs. 0.8161, p = 0.042). Post-ADAE dermatologist decisions also had equivalent or higher net benefit compared to biopsying all lesions. We validated the accuracy of an open-source melanoma AI algorithm and showed its theoretical potential for improving dermatology experts’ ability to evaluate lesions suspicious of melanoma. Larger randomized trials are needed to fully evaluate the potential of adopting this AI algorithm into clinical workflows. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10338483/ /pubmed/37438476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00872-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Marchetti, Michael A. Cowen, Emily A. Kurtansky, Nicholas R. Weber, Jochen Dauscher, Megan DeFazio, Jennifer Deng, Liang Dusza, Stephen W. Haliasos, Helen Halpern, Allan C. Hosein, Sharif Nazir, Zaeem H. Marghoob, Ashfaq A. Quigley, Elizabeth A. Salvador, Trina Rotemberg, Veronica M. Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title | Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title_full | Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title_fullStr | Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title_short | Prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (PROVE-AI study) |
title_sort | prospective validation of dermoscopy-based open-source artificial intelligence for melanoma diagnosis (prove-ai study) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00872-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marchettimichaela prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT cowenemilya prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT kurtanskynicholasr prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT weberjochen prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT dauschermegan prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT defaziojennifer prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT dengliang prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT duszastephenw prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT haliasoshelen prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT halpernallanc prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT hoseinsharif prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT nazirzaeemh prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT marghoobashfaqa prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT quigleyelizabetha prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT salvadortrina prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy AT rotembergveronicam prospectivevalidationofdermoscopybasedopensourceartificialintelligenceformelanomadiagnosisproveaistudy |