Cargando…

At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football

BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirase, Takashi, Bondar, Kevin, Doucet, Dakota, Moore, Brady, Saifi, Comron, Marco, Rex A.W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968
_version_ 1785071674401488896
author Hirase, Takashi
Bondar, Kevin
Doucet, Dakota
Moore, Brady
Saifi, Comron
Marco, Rex A.W.
author_facet Hirase, Takashi
Bondar, Kevin
Doucet, Dakota
Moore, Brady
Saifi, Comron
Marco, Rex A.W.
author_sort Hirase, Takashi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: To assess tackling techniques used during National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football games and to evaluate the successful tackling rates according to technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts made in the 2021 season (October to December) by 8 universities within the NCAA Southeastern Conference. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt, the tackling method, and the initial point of contact with respect to the offensive player’s waist. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. RESULTS: Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 902 (90.2%) and 98 (9.8%) tackle attempts, respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 76.2% of the attempts compared with 55.1% for head-down tackles (P < .001). Tackles were made at or above the offensive player’s waist in 777 (77.7%) attempts and below the waist in 223 (22.3%) attempts. Tackles at or above the waist were successful in 77.6% of the attempts compared with 61.9% of tackles below the waist (P < .001). The inside-shoulder method was used in 592 (59.2%) tackles, the arm method in 317 (31.7%), the head-across-the-bow method in 72 (7.2%), and the helmet-to-helmet method in 19 (1.9%). Inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rate of 93.2%, compared with 41.6% for arm (P < .001), 59.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001), and 73.7% for helmet-to-helmet (P = .001) tackles. Inside-shoulder tackles resulted in head-up tackling in 92.9% compared with 41.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001) and 57.9% for helmet-to-helmet (P < .001) tackles. There were no recorded injuries to the tackler. CONCLUSION: Head-up tackles, tackles made at or above the offensive player’s waist, and inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rates. Head-down tackling and tackling below the waist were associated with poor tackling methods, including head-across-the-bow and helmet-to-helmet tackles, which had lower success rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103386642023-07-14 At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Hirase, Takashi Bondar, Kevin Doucet, Dakota Moore, Brady Saifi, Comron Marco, Rex A.W. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: To assess tackling techniques used during National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football games and to evaluate the successful tackling rates according to technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts made in the 2021 season (October to December) by 8 universities within the NCAA Southeastern Conference. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt, the tackling method, and the initial point of contact with respect to the offensive player’s waist. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. RESULTS: Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 902 (90.2%) and 98 (9.8%) tackle attempts, respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 76.2% of the attempts compared with 55.1% for head-down tackles (P < .001). Tackles were made at or above the offensive player’s waist in 777 (77.7%) attempts and below the waist in 223 (22.3%) attempts. Tackles at or above the waist were successful in 77.6% of the attempts compared with 61.9% of tackles below the waist (P < .001). The inside-shoulder method was used in 592 (59.2%) tackles, the arm method in 317 (31.7%), the head-across-the-bow method in 72 (7.2%), and the helmet-to-helmet method in 19 (1.9%). Inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rate of 93.2%, compared with 41.6% for arm (P < .001), 59.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001), and 73.7% for helmet-to-helmet (P = .001) tackles. Inside-shoulder tackles resulted in head-up tackling in 92.9% compared with 41.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001) and 57.9% for helmet-to-helmet (P < .001) tackles. There were no recorded injuries to the tackler. CONCLUSION: Head-up tackles, tackles made at or above the offensive player’s waist, and inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rates. Head-down tackling and tackling below the waist were associated with poor tackling methods, including head-across-the-bow and helmet-to-helmet tackles, which had lower success rates. SAGE Publications 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10338664/ /pubmed/37457046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Hirase, Takashi
Bondar, Kevin
Doucet, Dakota
Moore, Brady
Saifi, Comron
Marco, Rex A.W.
At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title_full At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title_fullStr At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title_full_unstemmed At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title_short At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
title_sort at-risk tackling techniques and effectiveness in ncaa division i collegiate football
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968
work_keys_str_mv AT hirasetakashi atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball
AT bondarkevin atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball
AT doucetdakota atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball
AT moorebrady atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball
AT saificomron atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball
AT marcorexaw atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball