Cargando…
At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football
BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968 |
_version_ | 1785071674401488896 |
---|---|
author | Hirase, Takashi Bondar, Kevin Doucet, Dakota Moore, Brady Saifi, Comron Marco, Rex A.W. |
author_facet | Hirase, Takashi Bondar, Kevin Doucet, Dakota Moore, Brady Saifi, Comron Marco, Rex A.W. |
author_sort | Hirase, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: To assess tackling techniques used during National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football games and to evaluate the successful tackling rates according to technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts made in the 2021 season (October to December) by 8 universities within the NCAA Southeastern Conference. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt, the tackling method, and the initial point of contact with respect to the offensive player’s waist. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. RESULTS: Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 902 (90.2%) and 98 (9.8%) tackle attempts, respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 76.2% of the attempts compared with 55.1% for head-down tackles (P < .001). Tackles were made at or above the offensive player’s waist in 777 (77.7%) attempts and below the waist in 223 (22.3%) attempts. Tackles at or above the waist were successful in 77.6% of the attempts compared with 61.9% of tackles below the waist (P < .001). The inside-shoulder method was used in 592 (59.2%) tackles, the arm method in 317 (31.7%), the head-across-the-bow method in 72 (7.2%), and the helmet-to-helmet method in 19 (1.9%). Inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rate of 93.2%, compared with 41.6% for arm (P < .001), 59.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001), and 73.7% for helmet-to-helmet (P = .001) tackles. Inside-shoulder tackles resulted in head-up tackling in 92.9% compared with 41.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001) and 57.9% for helmet-to-helmet (P < .001) tackles. There were no recorded injuries to the tackler. CONCLUSION: Head-up tackles, tackles made at or above the offensive player’s waist, and inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rates. Head-down tackling and tackling below the waist were associated with poor tackling methods, including head-across-the-bow and helmet-to-helmet tackles, which had lower success rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103386642023-07-14 At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Hirase, Takashi Bondar, Kevin Doucet, Dakota Moore, Brady Saifi, Comron Marco, Rex A.W. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Head-down tackling has been associated with injuries to the brachial plexus, cervical spine, and head in high school and collegiate American football. Head-down tackling has also been associated with decreased effectiveness in successful tackles compared with head-up tackling. PURPOSE: To assess tackling techniques used during National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I football games and to evaluate the successful tackling rates according to technique. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Three reviewers analyzed 1000 consecutive solo defensive tackling attempts made in the 2021 season (October to December) by 8 universities within the NCAA Southeastern Conference. Slow-motion replays were used to analyze the success of the tackling attempt, the tackling method, and the initial point of contact with respect to the offensive player’s waist. The chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to analyze categorical data, and the 2-tailed Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous data. RESULTS: Head-up and head-down tackling occurred in 902 (90.2%) and 98 (9.8%) tackle attempts, respectively. Head-up tackles were successful in 76.2% of the attempts compared with 55.1% for head-down tackles (P < .001). Tackles were made at or above the offensive player’s waist in 777 (77.7%) attempts and below the waist in 223 (22.3%) attempts. Tackles at or above the waist were successful in 77.6% of the attempts compared with 61.9% of tackles below the waist (P < .001). The inside-shoulder method was used in 592 (59.2%) tackles, the arm method in 317 (31.7%), the head-across-the-bow method in 72 (7.2%), and the helmet-to-helmet method in 19 (1.9%). Inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rate of 93.2%, compared with 41.6% for arm (P < .001), 59.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001), and 73.7% for helmet-to-helmet (P = .001) tackles. Inside-shoulder tackles resulted in head-up tackling in 92.9% compared with 41.7% for head-across-the-bow (P < .001) and 57.9% for helmet-to-helmet (P < .001) tackles. There were no recorded injuries to the tackler. CONCLUSION: Head-up tackles, tackles made at or above the offensive player’s waist, and inside-shoulder tackles had the highest success rates. Head-down tackling and tackling below the waist were associated with poor tackling methods, including head-across-the-bow and helmet-to-helmet tackles, which had lower success rates. SAGE Publications 2023-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10338664/ /pubmed/37457046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Hirase, Takashi Bondar, Kevin Doucet, Dakota Moore, Brady Saifi, Comron Marco, Rex A.W. At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title | At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title_full | At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title_fullStr | At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title_full_unstemmed | At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title_short | At-Risk Tackling Techniques and Effectiveness in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football |
title_sort | at-risk tackling techniques and effectiveness in ncaa division i collegiate football |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231182968 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirasetakashi atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball AT bondarkevin atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball AT doucetdakota atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball AT moorebrady atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball AT saificomron atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball AT marcorexaw atrisktacklingtechniquesandeffectivenessinncaadivisionicollegiatefootball |