Cargando…
Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were cu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467 |
_version_ | 1785071688742862848 |
---|---|
author | Ouyang, Ganlu Chen, Zhebin Dou, Meng Luo, Xu Wen, Han Deng, Xiangbing Meng, Wenjian Yu, Yongyang Wu, Bing Jiang, Dan Wang, Ziqiang Yao, Yu Wang, Xin |
author_facet | Ouyang, Ganlu Chen, Zhebin Dou, Meng Luo, Xu Wen, Han Deng, Xiangbing Meng, Wenjian Yu, Yongyang Wu, Bing Jiang, Dan Wang, Ziqiang Yao, Yu Wang, Xin |
author_sort | Ouyang, Ganlu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were curated from patients with LARC and analyzed using logistic regression (LR) and deep learning (DL) methods to predict TNT response retrospectively. We defined two groups of response to TNT as pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR (Group 1), and high sensitivity [tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and TRG 1] versus moderate sensitivity (TRG 2 or patients with TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume of at least 20% compared to baseline) versus low sensitivity (TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume <20% compared to baseline) (Group 2). We extracted and selected clinical and radiomic features on baseline T2WI. Then we built LR models and DL models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to assess predictive performance of models. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were assigned to the training cohort, and 29 patients were assigned to the testing cohort. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of LR models, which were predictive of high sensitivity and pCR, were 0.853 and 0.866, respectively. Whereas the AUCs of DL models were 0.829 and 0.838, respectively. After 10 rounds of cross validation, the accuracy of the models in Group 1 is higher than in Group 2. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between LR model and DL model. Artificial Intelligence-based radiomics biomarkers may have potential clinical implications for adaptive and personalized therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103387282023-07-14 Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data Ouyang, Ganlu Chen, Zhebin Dou, Meng Luo, Xu Wen, Han Deng, Xiangbing Meng, Wenjian Yu, Yongyang Wu, Bing Jiang, Dan Wang, Ziqiang Yao, Yu Wang, Xin Technol Cancer Res Treat Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were curated from patients with LARC and analyzed using logistic regression (LR) and deep learning (DL) methods to predict TNT response retrospectively. We defined two groups of response to TNT as pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR (Group 1), and high sensitivity [tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and TRG 1] versus moderate sensitivity (TRG 2 or patients with TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume of at least 20% compared to baseline) versus low sensitivity (TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume <20% compared to baseline) (Group 2). We extracted and selected clinical and radiomic features on baseline T2WI. Then we built LR models and DL models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to assess predictive performance of models. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were assigned to the training cohort, and 29 patients were assigned to the testing cohort. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of LR models, which were predictive of high sensitivity and pCR, were 0.853 and 0.866, respectively. Whereas the AUCs of DL models were 0.829 and 0.838, respectively. After 10 rounds of cross validation, the accuracy of the models in Group 1 is higher than in Group 2. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between LR model and DL model. Artificial Intelligence-based radiomics biomarkers may have potential clinical implications for adaptive and personalized therapy. SAGE Publications 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10338728/ /pubmed/37431270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research Ouyang, Ganlu Chen, Zhebin Dou, Meng Luo, Xu Wen, Han Deng, Xiangbing Meng, Wenjian Yu, Yongyang Wu, Bing Jiang, Dan Wang, Ziqiang Yao, Yu Wang, Xin Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title | Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title_full | Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title_fullStr | Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title_short | Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data |
title_sort | predicting rectal cancer response to total neoadjuvant treatment using an artificial intelligence model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data |
topic | Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ouyangganlu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT chenzhebin predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT doumeng predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT luoxu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT wenhan predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT dengxiangbing predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT mengwenjian predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT yuyongyang predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT wubing predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT jiangdan predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT wangziqiang predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT yaoyu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata AT wangxin predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata |