Cargando…

Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data

PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ouyang, Ganlu, Chen, Zhebin, Dou, Meng, Luo, Xu, Wen, Han, Deng, Xiangbing, Meng, Wenjian, Yu, Yongyang, Wu, Bing, Jiang, Dan, Wang, Ziqiang, Yao, Yu, Wang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467
_version_ 1785071688742862848
author Ouyang, Ganlu
Chen, Zhebin
Dou, Meng
Luo, Xu
Wen, Han
Deng, Xiangbing
Meng, Wenjian
Yu, Yongyang
Wu, Bing
Jiang, Dan
Wang, Ziqiang
Yao, Yu
Wang, Xin
author_facet Ouyang, Ganlu
Chen, Zhebin
Dou, Meng
Luo, Xu
Wen, Han
Deng, Xiangbing
Meng, Wenjian
Yu, Yongyang
Wu, Bing
Jiang, Dan
Wang, Ziqiang
Yao, Yu
Wang, Xin
author_sort Ouyang, Ganlu
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were curated from patients with LARC and analyzed using logistic regression (LR) and deep learning (DL) methods to predict TNT response retrospectively. We defined two groups of response to TNT as pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR (Group 1), and high sensitivity [tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and TRG 1] versus moderate sensitivity (TRG 2 or patients with TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume of at least 20% compared to baseline) versus low sensitivity (TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume <20% compared to baseline) (Group 2). We extracted and selected clinical and radiomic features on baseline T2WI. Then we built LR models and DL models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to assess predictive performance of models. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were assigned to the training cohort, and 29 patients were assigned to the testing cohort. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of LR models, which were predictive of high sensitivity and pCR, were 0.853 and 0.866, respectively. Whereas the AUCs of DL models were 0.829 and 0.838, respectively. After 10 rounds of cross validation, the accuracy of the models in Group 1 is higher than in Group 2. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between LR model and DL model. Artificial Intelligence-based radiomics biomarkers may have potential clinical implications for adaptive and personalized therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103387282023-07-14 Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data Ouyang, Ganlu Chen, Zhebin Dou, Meng Luo, Xu Wen, Han Deng, Xiangbing Meng, Wenjian Yu, Yongyang Wu, Bing Jiang, Dan Wang, Ziqiang Yao, Yu Wang, Xin Technol Cancer Res Treat Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research PURPOSE: To develop a model for predicting response to total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) based on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data using artificial intelligence methods. METHODS: Baseline MRI and clinical data were curated from patients with LARC and analyzed using logistic regression (LR) and deep learning (DL) methods to predict TNT response retrospectively. We defined two groups of response to TNT as pathological complete response (pCR) versus non-pCR (Group 1), and high sensitivity [tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and TRG 1] versus moderate sensitivity (TRG 2 or patients with TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume of at least 20% compared to baseline) versus low sensitivity (TRG 3 and a reduction in tumor volume <20% compared to baseline) (Group 2). We extracted and selected clinical and radiomic features on baseline T2WI. Then we built LR models and DL models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to assess predictive performance of models. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were assigned to the training cohort, and 29 patients were assigned to the testing cohort. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of LR models, which were predictive of high sensitivity and pCR, were 0.853 and 0.866, respectively. Whereas the AUCs of DL models were 0.829 and 0.838, respectively. After 10 rounds of cross validation, the accuracy of the models in Group 1 is higher than in Group 2. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between LR model and DL model. Artificial Intelligence-based radiomics biomarkers may have potential clinical implications for adaptive and personalized therapy. SAGE Publications 2023-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10338728/ /pubmed/37431270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research
Ouyang, Ganlu
Chen, Zhebin
Dou, Meng
Luo, Xu
Wen, Han
Deng, Xiangbing
Meng, Wenjian
Yu, Yongyang
Wu, Bing
Jiang, Dan
Wang, Ziqiang
Yao, Yu
Wang, Xin
Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title_full Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title_fullStr Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title_short Predicting Rectal Cancer Response to Total Neoadjuvant Treatment Using an Artificial Intelligence Model Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Data
title_sort predicting rectal cancer response to total neoadjuvant treatment using an artificial intelligence model based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data
topic Novel applications of Artificial Intelligence in cancer research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37431270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15330338231186467
work_keys_str_mv AT ouyangganlu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT chenzhebin predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT doumeng predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT luoxu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT wenhan predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT dengxiangbing predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT mengwenjian predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT yuyongyang predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT wubing predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT jiangdan predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT wangziqiang predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT yaoyu predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata
AT wangxin predictingrectalcancerresponsetototalneoadjuvanttreatmentusinganartificialintelligencemodelbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingandclinicaldata