Cargando…

Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service

INTRODUCTION: Dosimetric accuracy is critical when a patient treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is transferred to another beam‐matched linac. To evaluate the performance of Accelerated Go Live (AGL) service, the measured beam characteristics and patient specific quality assurance (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsuneda, Masato, Abe, Kota, Fujita, Yukio, Morimoto, Ryo, Hashimoto, Takuma, Abe, Yukinao, Uno, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14071
_version_ 1785071705315606528
author Tsuneda, Masato
Abe, Kota
Fujita, Yukio
Morimoto, Ryo
Hashimoto, Takuma
Abe, Yukinao
Uno, Takashi
author_facet Tsuneda, Masato
Abe, Kota
Fujita, Yukio
Morimoto, Ryo
Hashimoto, Takuma
Abe, Yukinao
Uno, Takashi
author_sort Tsuneda, Masato
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Dosimetric accuracy is critical when a patient treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is transferred to another beam‐matched linac. To evaluate the performance of Accelerated Go Live (AGL) service, the measured beam characteristics and patient specific quality assurance (QA) results between two AGL‐matched linacs were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two VersaHD linacs were installed using the AGL service. After the installation, the beam data such as percentage depth dose (PDD), lateral profiles and output factors for all photon beams were measured. Relative doses were also measured as a function of the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) leaf gap width. Subsequently, VMAT plans were created for prostate, pelvis, head and neck, liver, lung cancers and multiple brain metastases. Dose distributions and point doses were measured by multi‐dimensional detectors and ionization chambers for patient specific quality assurance, and comparisons were made between the two linacs. RESULTS: Dose differences in PDDs were all within ± 1% except the entrance region, and the averaged gamma indices of the lateral profiles were within 0.3. The differences in doses as a function of the MLC leaf gap width between the two linacs were within ±0.5%. For all the plans, gamma passing rates were all higher than 95% with criteria of 2%/2 mm. The average and the SD of dose differences on the multi‐dimensional detector between both measurements was 0.06 ± 2.12%, and the average of point dose differences was −0.03 ± 0.33%. CONCLUSION: We have evaluated the AGL performance in the context of beam characteristics and patient specific QA. It was demonstrated that the AGL service provides an accurate VMAT treatment reproducibility for many tumor sites with gamma pass rates greater than 95% under criteria of 2%/2 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103388002023-07-14 Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service Tsuneda, Masato Abe, Kota Fujita, Yukio Morimoto, Ryo Hashimoto, Takuma Abe, Yukinao Uno, Takashi J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements INTRODUCTION: Dosimetric accuracy is critical when a patient treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is transferred to another beam‐matched linac. To evaluate the performance of Accelerated Go Live (AGL) service, the measured beam characteristics and patient specific quality assurance (QA) results between two AGL‐matched linacs were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two VersaHD linacs were installed using the AGL service. After the installation, the beam data such as percentage depth dose (PDD), lateral profiles and output factors for all photon beams were measured. Relative doses were also measured as a function of the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) leaf gap width. Subsequently, VMAT plans were created for prostate, pelvis, head and neck, liver, lung cancers and multiple brain metastases. Dose distributions and point doses were measured by multi‐dimensional detectors and ionization chambers for patient specific quality assurance, and comparisons were made between the two linacs. RESULTS: Dose differences in PDDs were all within ± 1% except the entrance region, and the averaged gamma indices of the lateral profiles were within 0.3. The differences in doses as a function of the MLC leaf gap width between the two linacs were within ±0.5%. For all the plans, gamma passing rates were all higher than 95% with criteria of 2%/2 mm. The average and the SD of dose differences on the multi‐dimensional detector between both measurements was 0.06 ± 2.12%, and the average of point dose differences was −0.03 ± 0.33%. CONCLUSION: We have evaluated the AGL performance in the context of beam characteristics and patient specific QA. It was demonstrated that the AGL service provides an accurate VMAT treatment reproducibility for many tumor sites with gamma pass rates greater than 95% under criteria of 2%/2 mm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10338800/ /pubmed/37327042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14071 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Tsuneda, Masato
Abe, Kota
Fujita, Yukio
Morimoto, Ryo
Hashimoto, Takuma
Abe, Yukinao
Uno, Takashi
Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title_full Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title_fullStr Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title_full_unstemmed Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title_short Delivery accuracy of VMAT on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
title_sort delivery accuracy of vmat on two beam‐matched linacs provided by accelerated go live service
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37327042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14071
work_keys_str_mv AT tsunedamasato deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT abekota deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT fujitayukio deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT morimotoryo deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT hashimototakuma deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT abeyukinao deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice
AT unotakashi deliveryaccuracyofvmatontwobeammatchedlinacsprovidedbyacceleratedgoliveservice