Cargando…
Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry
As cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become the localization method for a majority of cases, the indications for diode‐based confirmation of accurate patient set‐up and treatment are now limited and must be balanced between proper resource allocation and optimizing efficiency without compromi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36877712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13953 |
_version_ | 1785071710551146496 |
---|---|
author | Mao, Serena P. H. Han‐Oh, Sarah Moore, Joseph Huang, Ellen McNutt, Todd R. Souranis, Annette N. Briner, Valerie Halthore, Aditya Alcorn, Sarah R. Meyer, Jeffrey J. Viswanathan, Akila N. Wright, Jean L. |
author_facet | Mao, Serena P. H. Han‐Oh, Sarah Moore, Joseph Huang, Ellen McNutt, Todd R. Souranis, Annette N. Briner, Valerie Halthore, Aditya Alcorn, Sarah R. Meyer, Jeffrey J. Viswanathan, Akila N. Wright, Jean L. |
author_sort | Mao, Serena P. H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | As cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become the localization method for a majority of cases, the indications for diode‐based confirmation of accurate patient set‐up and treatment are now limited and must be balanced between proper resource allocation and optimizing efficiency without compromising safety. We undertook a de‐implementation quality improvement project to discontinue routine diode use in non‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) cases in favor of tailored selection of scenarios where diodes may be useful. After analysis of safety reports from the last 5 years, literature review, and stakeholder discussions, our safety and quality (SAQ) committee introduced a recommendation to limit diode use to specific scenarios in which in vivo verification may add value to standard quality assurance (QA) processes. To assess changes in patterns of use, we reviewed diode use by clinical indication 4 months prior and after the implementation of the revised policy, which includes use of diodes for: 3D conformal photon fields set up without CBCT; total body irradiation (TBI); electron beams; cardiac devices within 10 cm of the treatment field; and unique scenarios on a case‐by‐case basis. We identified 4459 prescriptions and 1038 unique instances of diode use across five clinical sites from 5/2021 to 1/2022. After implementation of the revised policy, we observed an overall decrease in diode use from 32% to 13.2%, with a precipitous drop in 3D cases utilizing CBCT (from 23.2% to 4%), while maintaining diode utilization in the 5 selected scenarios including 100% of TBI and electron cases. By identifying specific indications for diode use and creating a user‐friendly platform for case selection, we have successfully de‐implemented routine diode use in favor of a selective process that identifies cases where the diode is important for patient safety. In doing so, we have streamlined patient care and decreased cost without compromising patient safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103388212023-07-14 Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry Mao, Serena P. H. Han‐Oh, Sarah Moore, Joseph Huang, Ellen McNutt, Todd R. Souranis, Annette N. Briner, Valerie Halthore, Aditya Alcorn, Sarah R. Meyer, Jeffrey J. Viswanathan, Akila N. Wright, Jean L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics As cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become the localization method for a majority of cases, the indications for diode‐based confirmation of accurate patient set‐up and treatment are now limited and must be balanced between proper resource allocation and optimizing efficiency without compromising safety. We undertook a de‐implementation quality improvement project to discontinue routine diode use in non‐intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) cases in favor of tailored selection of scenarios where diodes may be useful. After analysis of safety reports from the last 5 years, literature review, and stakeholder discussions, our safety and quality (SAQ) committee introduced a recommendation to limit diode use to specific scenarios in which in vivo verification may add value to standard quality assurance (QA) processes. To assess changes in patterns of use, we reviewed diode use by clinical indication 4 months prior and after the implementation of the revised policy, which includes use of diodes for: 3D conformal photon fields set up without CBCT; total body irradiation (TBI); electron beams; cardiac devices within 10 cm of the treatment field; and unique scenarios on a case‐by‐case basis. We identified 4459 prescriptions and 1038 unique instances of diode use across five clinical sites from 5/2021 to 1/2022. After implementation of the revised policy, we observed an overall decrease in diode use from 32% to 13.2%, with a precipitous drop in 3D cases utilizing CBCT (from 23.2% to 4%), while maintaining diode utilization in the 5 selected scenarios including 100% of TBI and electron cases. By identifying specific indications for diode use and creating a user‐friendly platform for case selection, we have successfully de‐implemented routine diode use in favor of a selective process that identifies cases where the diode is important for patient safety. In doing so, we have streamlined patient care and decreased cost without compromising patient safety. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10338821/ /pubmed/36877712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13953 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Mao, Serena P. H. Han‐Oh, Sarah Moore, Joseph Huang, Ellen McNutt, Todd R. Souranis, Annette N. Briner, Valerie Halthore, Aditya Alcorn, Sarah R. Meyer, Jeffrey J. Viswanathan, Akila N. Wright, Jean L. Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title | Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title_full | Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title_fullStr | Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title_short | Selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
title_sort | selective de‐implementation of routine in vivo dosimetry |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36877712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13953 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maoserenaph selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT hanohsarah selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT moorejoseph selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT huangellen selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT mcnutttoddr selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT souranisannetten selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT brinervalerie selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT halthoreaditya selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT alcornsarahr selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT meyerjeffreyj selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT viswanathanakilan selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry AT wrightjeanl selectivedeimplementationofroutineinvivodosimetry |