Cargando…
Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor
PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the liver, RTOG‐1112 guides the treatment modalities including the dose constraints for this technique but not the plan parameters. This study is not only analyzing the plan quality by utilizing the plan parameters and indexes but also compa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13948 |
_version_ | 1785071713263812608 |
---|---|
author | Watcharawipha, Anirut Chakrabandhu, Somvilai Kongsa, Anupong Tippanya, Damrongsak Chitapanarux, Imjai |
author_facet | Watcharawipha, Anirut Chakrabandhu, Somvilai Kongsa, Anupong Tippanya, Damrongsak Chitapanarux, Imjai |
author_sort | Watcharawipha, Anirut |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the liver, RTOG‐1112 guides the treatment modalities including the dose constraints for this technique but not the plan parameters. This study is not only analyzing the plan quality by utilizing the plan parameters and indexes but also compares treatment modalities from the protocol implementation. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Twenty‐five patients treated in the period from February 2020 to September 2022 were recruited in this analysis. Two planners randomly selected the patients and modalities. The modalities employed were Volumetric‐Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT). Various parameters and indexes were used to access not only the plan quality but also to compare each modality. The parameters and indexes studied were the homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), gradient distance (GD), and the dose received by the organs at risk. RESULT: The data reveals that the mean volume of PTV is 60.8 ± 53.9 cc where these targets exhibit no significant difference between each modality. The HI shows a consistent value for both modalities. Between each modality, the CI value shows less deviation, but the HT shows slightly higher performance than VMAT. The value of GD is 1.5 ± 0.3 cm where the HT provides a shorter distance compared to VMAT as well. CONCLUSION: The parameters and indexes should be utilized for the plan evaluation although in the guidelines this was not required. Various modalities were employed for treatment. Both can achieve the treatment criteria with slightly low performance of VMAT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338832 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103388322023-07-14 Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor Watcharawipha, Anirut Chakrabandhu, Somvilai Kongsa, Anupong Tippanya, Damrongsak Chitapanarux, Imjai J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in the liver, RTOG‐1112 guides the treatment modalities including the dose constraints for this technique but not the plan parameters. This study is not only analyzing the plan quality by utilizing the plan parameters and indexes but also compares treatment modalities from the protocol implementation. METHOD AND MATERIAL: Twenty‐five patients treated in the period from February 2020 to September 2022 were recruited in this analysis. Two planners randomly selected the patients and modalities. The modalities employed were Volumetric‐Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT). Various parameters and indexes were used to access not only the plan quality but also to compare each modality. The parameters and indexes studied were the homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), gradient distance (GD), and the dose received by the organs at risk. RESULT: The data reveals that the mean volume of PTV is 60.8 ± 53.9 cc where these targets exhibit no significant difference between each modality. The HI shows a consistent value for both modalities. Between each modality, the CI value shows less deviation, but the HT shows slightly higher performance than VMAT. The value of GD is 1.5 ± 0.3 cm where the HT provides a shorter distance compared to VMAT as well. CONCLUSION: The parameters and indexes should be utilized for the plan evaluation although in the guidelines this was not required. Various modalities were employed for treatment. Both can achieve the treatment criteria with slightly low performance of VMAT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10338832/ /pubmed/36857202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13948 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Watcharawipha, Anirut Chakrabandhu, Somvilai Kongsa, Anupong Tippanya, Damrongsak Chitapanarux, Imjai Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title | Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title_full | Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title_fullStr | Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title_short | Plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
title_sort | plan quality analysis of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy treatment planning in liver tumor |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338832/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36857202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watcharawiphaanirut planqualityanalysisofstereotacticablativebodyradiotherapytreatmentplanninginlivertumor AT chakrabandhusomvilai planqualityanalysisofstereotacticablativebodyradiotherapytreatmentplanninginlivertumor AT kongsaanupong planqualityanalysisofstereotacticablativebodyradiotherapytreatmentplanninginlivertumor AT tippanyadamrongsak planqualityanalysisofstereotacticablativebodyradiotherapytreatmentplanninginlivertumor AT chitapanaruximjai planqualityanalysisofstereotacticablativebodyradiotherapytreatmentplanninginlivertumor |