Cargando…
A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences
PURPOSE: Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (oART) follows a different treatment paradigm than conventional radiotherapy, and because of this, the resources, implementation, and workflows needed are unique. The purpose of this report is to outline our institution's experience establishing, organ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13961 |
_version_ | 1785071715931389952 |
---|---|
author | Stanley, Dennis N. Harms, Joseph Pogue, Joel A. Belliveau, Jean‐Guy Marcrom, Samuel R. McDonald, Andrew M. Dobelbower, Michael C. Boggs, Drexell H. Soike, Michael H. Fiveash, John A. Popple, Richard A. Cardenas, Carlos E. |
author_facet | Stanley, Dennis N. Harms, Joseph Pogue, Joel A. Belliveau, Jean‐Guy Marcrom, Samuel R. McDonald, Andrew M. Dobelbower, Michael C. Boggs, Drexell H. Soike, Michael H. Fiveash, John A. Popple, Richard A. Cardenas, Carlos E. |
author_sort | Stanley, Dennis N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (oART) follows a different treatment paradigm than conventional radiotherapy, and because of this, the resources, implementation, and workflows needed are unique. The purpose of this report is to outline our institution's experience establishing, organizing, and implementing an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. METHODS: We include resources used, operational models utilized, program creation timelines, and our institutional experiences with the implementation and operation of an oART program. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of our first year's clinical experience where we delivered over 1000 daily adaptive fractions. For all treatments, the different stages of online adaption, primary patient set‐up, initial kV‐CBCT acquisition, contouring review and edit of influencer structures, target review and edits, plan evaluation and selection, Mobius3D 2nd check and adaptive QA, 2nd kV‐CBCT for positional verification, treatment delivery, and patient leaving the room, were analyzed. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 97 patients treated from August 2021–August 2022. One thousand six hundred seventy seven individual fractions were treated and analyzed, 632(38%) were non‐adaptive and 1045(62%) were adaptive. Seventy four of the 97 patients (76%) were treated with standard fractionation and 23 (24%) received stereotactic treatments. For the adaptive treatments, the generated adaptive plan was selected in 92% of treatments. On average(±std), adaptive sessions took 34.52 ± 11.42 min from start to finish. The entire adaptive process (from start of contour generation to verification CBCT), performed by the physicist (and physician on select days), was 19.84 ± 8.21 min. CONCLUSION: We present our institution's experience commissioning an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. It took us 12 months from project inception to the treatment of our first patient and 12 months to treat 1000 adaptive fractions. Retrospective analysis of delivered fractions showed that the average overall treatment time was approximately 35 min and the average time for the adaptive component of treatment was approximately 20 min. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10338842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103388422023-07-14 A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences Stanley, Dennis N. Harms, Joseph Pogue, Joel A. Belliveau, Jean‐Guy Marcrom, Samuel R. McDonald, Andrew M. Dobelbower, Michael C. Boggs, Drexell H. Soike, Michael H. Fiveash, John A. Popple, Richard A. Cardenas, Carlos E. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (oART) follows a different treatment paradigm than conventional radiotherapy, and because of this, the resources, implementation, and workflows needed are unique. The purpose of this report is to outline our institution's experience establishing, organizing, and implementing an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. METHODS: We include resources used, operational models utilized, program creation timelines, and our institutional experiences with the implementation and operation of an oART program. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of our first year's clinical experience where we delivered over 1000 daily adaptive fractions. For all treatments, the different stages of online adaption, primary patient set‐up, initial kV‐CBCT acquisition, contouring review and edit of influencer structures, target review and edits, plan evaluation and selection, Mobius3D 2nd check and adaptive QA, 2nd kV‐CBCT for positional verification, treatment delivery, and patient leaving the room, were analyzed. RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 97 patients treated from August 2021–August 2022. One thousand six hundred seventy seven individual fractions were treated and analyzed, 632(38%) were non‐adaptive and 1045(62%) were adaptive. Seventy four of the 97 patients (76%) were treated with standard fractionation and 23 (24%) received stereotactic treatments. For the adaptive treatments, the generated adaptive plan was selected in 92% of treatments. On average(±std), adaptive sessions took 34.52 ± 11.42 min from start to finish. The entire adaptive process (from start of contour generation to verification CBCT), performed by the physicist (and physician on select days), was 19.84 ± 8.21 min. CONCLUSION: We present our institution's experience commissioning an oART program using the Ethos therapy system. It took us 12 months from project inception to the treatment of our first patient and 12 months to treat 1000 adaptive fractions. Retrospective analysis of delivered fractions showed that the average overall treatment time was approximately 35 min and the average time for the adaptive component of treatment was approximately 20 min. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10338842/ /pubmed/36920871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13961 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Stanley, Dennis N. Harms, Joseph Pogue, Joel A. Belliveau, Jean‐Guy Marcrom, Samuel R. McDonald, Andrew M. Dobelbower, Michael C. Boggs, Drexell H. Soike, Michael H. Fiveash, John A. Popple, Richard A. Cardenas, Carlos E. A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title | A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title_full | A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title_fullStr | A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title_short | A roadmap for implementation of kV‐CBCT online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
title_sort | roadmap for implementation of kv‐cbct online adaptive radiation therapy and initial first year experiences |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36920871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanleydennisn aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT harmsjoseph aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT poguejoela aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT belliveaujeanguy aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT marcromsamuelr aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT mcdonaldandrewm aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT dobelbowermichaelc aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT boggsdrexellh aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT soikemichaelh aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT fiveashjohna aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT popplericharda aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT cardenascarlose aroadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT stanleydennisn roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT harmsjoseph roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT poguejoela roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT belliveaujeanguy roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT marcromsamuelr roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT mcdonaldandrewm roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT dobelbowermichaelc roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT boggsdrexellh roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT soikemichaelh roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT fiveashjohna roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT popplericharda roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences AT cardenascarlose roadmapforimplementationofkvcbctonlineadaptiveradiationtherapyandinitialfirstyearexperiences |