Cargando…

Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography

PURPOSE: To refine the currently used, weight‐grouped protocol for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in terms of the radiation and contrast medium dose, through clinical evaluation. METHODS: Following the current routine setting that varies between three weight groups (group A: 55–65 ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yan, Wang, Ying, Li, Jing, Zhang, Guozhi, Di, Aihui, Yuan, Huishu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14041
_version_ 1785071718129205248
author Zhang, Yan
Wang, Ying
Li, Jing
Zhang, Guozhi
Di, Aihui
Yuan, Huishu
author_facet Zhang, Yan
Wang, Ying
Li, Jing
Zhang, Guozhi
Di, Aihui
Yuan, Huishu
author_sort Zhang, Yan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To refine the currently used, weight‐grouped protocol for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in terms of the radiation and contrast medium dose, through clinical evaluation. METHODS: Following the current routine setting that varies between three weight groups (group A: 55–65 kg, group B: 66–75 kg, group C: 76–85 kg), three additional reduction protocols were proposed to each group, with different combinations of lowered tube voltage (70–100 kVp), tube current (100–220 mAs), and iodine delivery rate (0.8–1.5 gI/s). A total of 321 patients scheduled for CCTA due to suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled, who were randomly assigned to one of the four subgroups of settings under the corresponding weight group. The resulting objective image quality was compared by measuring the contrast‐to‐noise ratio and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Subjective image quality was graded by two radiologists using a 4‐point Likert scale, on a total of 3848 segments. The optimal protocol for each weight group was determined with respect to the image quality and the applied radiation dose. RESULTS: For all three groups, no significant difference was noticed in objective images quality between subgroups of dose settings (all p > 0.05). The average score on subjective image quality was ≥3 for every subgroup, while the percentage of score 4 showed greater dependence on the setting, ranging from 83.2% to 91.5%, and was chosen to be the determining factor. The optimal dose settings were found to be 80 kVp, 150 mAs, and 1.0 gI/s for patients of 55–75 kg in weight, and 100 kVp, 170 mAs, and 1.5 gI/s for those of 76–85 kg. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to refine the currently used, weight‐grouped protocol for CCTA in terms of radiation and contrast medium dose, by use of an optimization strategy where the balance between dose and image quality can be improved in a routine clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103388512023-07-14 Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography Zhang, Yan Wang, Ying Li, Jing Zhang, Guozhi Di, Aihui Yuan, Huishu J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: To refine the currently used, weight‐grouped protocol for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in terms of the radiation and contrast medium dose, through clinical evaluation. METHODS: Following the current routine setting that varies between three weight groups (group A: 55–65 kg, group B: 66–75 kg, group C: 76–85 kg), three additional reduction protocols were proposed to each group, with different combinations of lowered tube voltage (70–100 kVp), tube current (100–220 mAs), and iodine delivery rate (0.8–1.5 gI/s). A total of 321 patients scheduled for CCTA due to suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled, who were randomly assigned to one of the four subgroups of settings under the corresponding weight group. The resulting objective image quality was compared by measuring the contrast‐to‐noise ratio and signal‐to‐noise ratio. Subjective image quality was graded by two radiologists using a 4‐point Likert scale, on a total of 3848 segments. The optimal protocol for each weight group was determined with respect to the image quality and the applied radiation dose. RESULTS: For all three groups, no significant difference was noticed in objective images quality between subgroups of dose settings (all p > 0.05). The average score on subjective image quality was ≥3 for every subgroup, while the percentage of score 4 showed greater dependence on the setting, ranging from 83.2% to 91.5%, and was chosen to be the determining factor. The optimal dose settings were found to be 80 kVp, 150 mAs, and 1.0 gI/s for patients of 55–75 kg in weight, and 100 kVp, 170 mAs, and 1.5 gI/s for those of 76–85 kg. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to refine the currently used, weight‐grouped protocol for CCTA in terms of radiation and contrast medium dose, by use of an optimization strategy where the balance between dose and image quality can be improved in a routine clinical setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10338851/ /pubmed/37211752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14041 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
Zhang, Yan
Wang, Ying
Li, Jing
Zhang, Guozhi
Di, Aihui
Yuan, Huishu
Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title_full Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title_fullStr Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title_full_unstemmed Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title_short Refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary CT angiography
title_sort refining the radiation and contrast medium dose in weight‐grouped scanning protocols for coronary ct angiography
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37211752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14041
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyan refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography
AT wangying refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography
AT lijing refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography
AT zhangguozhi refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography
AT diaihui refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography
AT yuanhuishu refiningtheradiationandcontrastmediumdoseinweightgroupedscanningprotocolsforcoronaryctangiography