Cargando…

Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile

INTRODUCTION: After decades of absolute criminalization, on September 14, 2017, Chile decriminalized voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) when there is a life risk to the pregnant woman, lethal incompatibility of the embryo or fetus of genetic or chromosomal nature, and pregnancy due to rape. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero, Adela, Ramirez-Pereira, Mirliana, Robledo, Paz, Casas, Lidia, Vivaldi, Lieta, González, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1164049
_version_ 1785071733865185280
author Montero, Adela
Ramirez-Pereira, Mirliana
Robledo, Paz
Casas, Lidia
Vivaldi, Lieta
González, Daniela
author_facet Montero, Adela
Ramirez-Pereira, Mirliana
Robledo, Paz
Casas, Lidia
Vivaldi, Lieta
González, Daniela
author_sort Montero, Adela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: After decades of absolute criminalization, on September 14, 2017, Chile decriminalized voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) when there is a life risk to the pregnant woman, lethal incompatibility of the embryo or fetus of genetic or chromosomal nature, and pregnancy due to rape. The implementation of the law reveals multiple barriers hindering access to the services provided by the law. OBJECTIVES: To identify and analyze, using the Tanahashi Model, the main barriers to the implementation of law 21,030 in public health institutions. This article contributes to the follow-up of this public policy, making visible the obstacles that violate women's rights of women to have dignified access to abortion and that affect the quality of health care in Chile. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Qualitative design, following the postpositivist paradigm. The sample consisted of relevant actors directly related to pregnancy termination. Snowball sampling and semi-structured interviews were used. Grounded theory was used through inductive coding, originating categories regrouped into meta-categories following Tanahashi's model. The rigor criteria of transferability, dependability, credibility, authenticity, and epistemological theoretical adequacy were used. The identity of the participants and the confidentiality of the information were protected. RESULTS: From January 2021 to October 2022, 62 interviews were conducted with 20 members of the psychosocial support team; 18 managers; 17 members of the biomedical health team; 4 participants from of civil society, and three women users. The main obstacles correspond to availability barriers, accessibility barriers, acceptability barriers, contact barriers, and effectiveness barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to access abortion under three grounds violate the exercise of women's sexual and reproductive rights. It is urgent to carry out actions of control and follow-up of this public policy to the corresponding entities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103389162023-07-14 Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile Montero, Adela Ramirez-Pereira, Mirliana Robledo, Paz Casas, Lidia Vivaldi, Lieta González, Daniela Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: After decades of absolute criminalization, on September 14, 2017, Chile decriminalized voluntary termination of pregnancy (VTP) when there is a life risk to the pregnant woman, lethal incompatibility of the embryo or fetus of genetic or chromosomal nature, and pregnancy due to rape. The implementation of the law reveals multiple barriers hindering access to the services provided by the law. OBJECTIVES: To identify and analyze, using the Tanahashi Model, the main barriers to the implementation of law 21,030 in public health institutions. This article contributes to the follow-up of this public policy, making visible the obstacles that violate women's rights of women to have dignified access to abortion and that affect the quality of health care in Chile. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Qualitative design, following the postpositivist paradigm. The sample consisted of relevant actors directly related to pregnancy termination. Snowball sampling and semi-structured interviews were used. Grounded theory was used through inductive coding, originating categories regrouped into meta-categories following Tanahashi's model. The rigor criteria of transferability, dependability, credibility, authenticity, and epistemological theoretical adequacy were used. The identity of the participants and the confidentiality of the information were protected. RESULTS: From January 2021 to October 2022, 62 interviews were conducted with 20 members of the psychosocial support team; 18 managers; 17 members of the biomedical health team; 4 participants from of civil society, and three women users. The main obstacles correspond to availability barriers, accessibility barriers, acceptability barriers, contact barriers, and effectiveness barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to access abortion under three grounds violate the exercise of women's sexual and reproductive rights. It is urgent to carry out actions of control and follow-up of this public policy to the corresponding entities. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10338916/ /pubmed/37457269 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1164049 Text en Copyright © 2023 Montero, Ramirez-Pereira, Robledo, Casas, Vivaldi and González. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Montero, Adela
Ramirez-Pereira, Mirliana
Robledo, Paz
Casas, Lidia
Vivaldi, Lieta
González, Daniela
Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title_full Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title_fullStr Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title_full_unstemmed Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title_short Main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in Chile
title_sort main barriers to services linked to voluntary pregnancy termination on three grounds in chile
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457269
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1164049
work_keys_str_mv AT monteroadela mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile
AT ramirezpereiramirliana mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile
AT robledopaz mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile
AT casaslidia mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile
AT vivaldilieta mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile
AT gonzalezdaniela mainbarrierstoserviceslinkedtovoluntarypregnancyterminationonthreegroundsinchile