Cargando…

Cycling in older adults: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity provides many health benefits to older adults. As a well-known form of physical activity, cycling can be an appropriate means for older people to meet WHO recommendations and to improve their health. In addition, cycling can help to protect the environment and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kardan, Mohammadhossein, Akter, Taiyeba, Iqbal, Mehvish, Tcymbal, Antonina, Messing, Sven, Gelius, Peter, Abu-Omar, Karim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1157503
_version_ 1785071735330045952
author Kardan, Mohammadhossein
Akter, Taiyeba
Iqbal, Mehvish
Tcymbal, Antonina
Messing, Sven
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
author_facet Kardan, Mohammadhossein
Akter, Taiyeba
Iqbal, Mehvish
Tcymbal, Antonina
Messing, Sven
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
author_sort Kardan, Mohammadhossein
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity provides many health benefits to older adults. As a well-known form of physical activity, cycling can be an appropriate means for older people to meet WHO recommendations and to improve their health. In addition, cycling can help to protect the environment and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The primary aim of this scoping review is to identify the currently available scientific evidence and gaps of research in this field. METHODS: A systematic search in seven databases resulted in 7,192 studies. After the exclusion of duplicates, studies were screened by two independent reviewers in a two-stage process. Based on previously defined inclusion criteria, 123 studies were included. Data extraction was based on a descriptive analytical method, and seven categories for the main topics of studies were developed. Data were extracted by three reviewers to analyze different characteristics of included articles such as age range, study design, data type, gender, type of bicycle, and country of origin. RESULTS: The included studies covered the following topics: (1) traffic safety, (2) cycling as physical activity or for transport, (3) health benefits, (4) environmental factors, (5) facilitators and barriers, (6) application of technology and (7) promotion of cycling. Results show that the majority of studies were performed in both younger (60–79 years) and older (80+ years) adults. Most studies had an observational study design, used conventional bicycles, and were based on quantitative methods. Researchers from the United States, Netherlands, and Japan published the highest number of studies related to cycling. DISCUSSION: Traffic safety was the most prevalent focus of the included studies. Gaps were identified with regard to studies focusing on the promotion of cycling, application of technology, as well as facilitators and barriers of cycling. While research on traffic safety should continue to be a high priority for public health, potentially more research should focus on how to get older people to bicycle more. This is warranted by the proven individual and planetary health benefits of cycling and the urgency of combating climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10338922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103389222023-07-14 Cycling in older adults: a scoping review Kardan, Mohammadhossein Akter, Taiyeba Iqbal, Mehvish Tcymbal, Antonina Messing, Sven Gelius, Peter Abu-Omar, Karim Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living INTRODUCTION: Regular physical activity provides many health benefits to older adults. As a well-known form of physical activity, cycling can be an appropriate means for older people to meet WHO recommendations and to improve their health. In addition, cycling can help to protect the environment and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The primary aim of this scoping review is to identify the currently available scientific evidence and gaps of research in this field. METHODS: A systematic search in seven databases resulted in 7,192 studies. After the exclusion of duplicates, studies were screened by two independent reviewers in a two-stage process. Based on previously defined inclusion criteria, 123 studies were included. Data extraction was based on a descriptive analytical method, and seven categories for the main topics of studies were developed. Data were extracted by three reviewers to analyze different characteristics of included articles such as age range, study design, data type, gender, type of bicycle, and country of origin. RESULTS: The included studies covered the following topics: (1) traffic safety, (2) cycling as physical activity or for transport, (3) health benefits, (4) environmental factors, (5) facilitators and barriers, (6) application of technology and (7) promotion of cycling. Results show that the majority of studies were performed in both younger (60–79 years) and older (80+ years) adults. Most studies had an observational study design, used conventional bicycles, and were based on quantitative methods. Researchers from the United States, Netherlands, and Japan published the highest number of studies related to cycling. DISCUSSION: Traffic safety was the most prevalent focus of the included studies. Gaps were identified with regard to studies focusing on the promotion of cycling, application of technology, as well as facilitators and barriers of cycling. While research on traffic safety should continue to be a high priority for public health, potentially more research should focus on how to get older people to bicycle more. This is warranted by the proven individual and planetary health benefits of cycling and the urgency of combating climate change. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10338922/ /pubmed/37457855 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1157503 Text en © 2023 Kardan, Akter, Iqbal, Tcymbal, Messing, Gelius and Abu-Omar. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Sports and Active Living
Kardan, Mohammadhossein
Akter, Taiyeba
Iqbal, Mehvish
Tcymbal, Antonina
Messing, Sven
Gelius, Peter
Abu-Omar, Karim
Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title_full Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title_fullStr Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title_short Cycling in older adults: a scoping review
title_sort cycling in older adults: a scoping review
topic Sports and Active Living
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457855
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1157503
work_keys_str_mv AT kardanmohammadhossein cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT aktertaiyeba cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT iqbalmehvish cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT tcymbalantonina cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT messingsven cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT geliuspeter cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview
AT abuomarkarim cyclinginolderadultsascopingreview