Cargando…

Research trends in cholangiocarcinoma treatments during the last 3 decades

BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 years, numerous studies have focused on the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and these treatments have greatly evolved. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the research trends, we evaluated the most influential publications and attempted to identify their characterist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Kainan, Cao, Jiasheng, Chen, Haibo, Topatana, Win, Cai, Jingwei, Zhang, Bin, Hu, Jiahao, Jin, Renan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10338968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17100
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 years, numerous studies have focused on the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and these treatments have greatly evolved. OBJECTIVES: To better understand the research trends, we evaluated the most influential publications and attempted to identify their characteristics using bibliometric methods. METHODS: The most influential publications were identified from the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. The general characteristics of included papers were identified, and the research trends were explored via the bibliometric method. RESULTS: The average total number of citations for of the listed publications were 312 (range from 165 to 1922). The highest number of papers were published during period II (2001–2010, n = 50), followed by period III (2011–2020, n = 28), and period I (1991–2000, n = 22). The United States and Germany have made remarkable achievements in this field. Institutionally, Mayo Clinic and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were the leading institutions, with Blumgart and Zhu from the United States being the most influential authors. Close collaboration was established between the leading countries, institutions, and authors. The Annals of Surgery contributed the most to the papers with the highest total number of citations. Surgery predominated during period I (n = 14, 63.6%), with a gradual decline occurring during periods II (n = 19, 41.3%, P = 0.085) and period III (n = 3, 9.4%, P = 0.002). Contrastingly, the number of publications related to systemic therapy has increased significantly since period II and peaked in period III. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery remains the most important treatment for CCA. However systemic therapy has become a research and clinical application hotspot. These findings will contribute to the translation of treatments for CCA and provide researchers with relevant research directions.