Cargando…
Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates
OBJECTIVES: To compare repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable composite substrates. Also, to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on repair bond strength. METHODS: A total of 80-disc shaped specimens was fabricated using two...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17786 |
_version_ | 1785071758263451648 |
---|---|
author | AlOtaibi, AlFulwah A. Taher, Nadia M. |
author_facet | AlOtaibi, AlFulwah A. Taher, Nadia M. |
author_sort | AlOtaibi, AlFulwah A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable composite substrates. Also, to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on repair bond strength. METHODS: A total of 80-disc shaped specimens was fabricated using two resin based composite materials; IPS Empress Direct Enamel and OptiShade (n = 40). Substrate discs were thermocycle 5000 cycles then each substrate material was subdivided based on the surface treatment into two groups; air particle abrasion (APA) and silicon carbide grinding (SiCr) both groups followed by phosphoric acid etching. All groups received a single bond universal adhesive application prior to repairing with composite, in a smaller disc shape. All specimens were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles prior to shear bond strength testing and subsequent failure analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted and the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The comparison of mean values (considering the combination of the two types of substrates, surface treatments and repairing materials) showed a highly statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength among the eight study groups (p < 0.0001). The highest value of mean shear bond strength was associated with OptiShade substrates repaired by Diamond ONE (38.6 ± 2.4). Meanwhile, the lowest value was recorded for the SiCr treated OptiShade group repaired by Diamond ONE (13.6 ± 2.3). The failure analysis revealed that cohesive mode of failure was the most predominant. CONCLUSION: Omnichroma showed higher repair bond strength values with SiCr surface treatment. Meanwhile, Charisma Diamond ONE had better bond strength with APA. Surface pretreatment had a significant impact on the repair bond strength where APA groups had significantly higher values compared to SiCr groups. Clinical Significance: Within the limitation of the present study; APA is recommended as surface pretreatment for improved bond strength in restorative composite repairs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10339018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103390182023-07-14 Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates AlOtaibi, AlFulwah A. Taher, Nadia M. Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: To compare repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable composite substrates. Also, to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on repair bond strength. METHODS: A total of 80-disc shaped specimens was fabricated using two resin based composite materials; IPS Empress Direct Enamel and OptiShade (n = 40). Substrate discs were thermocycle 5000 cycles then each substrate material was subdivided based on the surface treatment into two groups; air particle abrasion (APA) and silicon carbide grinding (SiCr) both groups followed by phosphoric acid etching. All groups received a single bond universal adhesive application prior to repairing with composite, in a smaller disc shape. All specimens were thermocycled for 10,000 cycles prior to shear bond strength testing and subsequent failure analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted and the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The comparison of mean values (considering the combination of the two types of substrates, surface treatments and repairing materials) showed a highly statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength among the eight study groups (p < 0.0001). The highest value of mean shear bond strength was associated with OptiShade substrates repaired by Diamond ONE (38.6 ± 2.4). Meanwhile, the lowest value was recorded for the SiCr treated OptiShade group repaired by Diamond ONE (13.6 ± 2.3). The failure analysis revealed that cohesive mode of failure was the most predominant. CONCLUSION: Omnichroma showed higher repair bond strength values with SiCr surface treatment. Meanwhile, Charisma Diamond ONE had better bond strength with APA. Surface pretreatment had a significant impact on the repair bond strength where APA groups had significantly higher values compared to SiCr groups. Clinical Significance: Within the limitation of the present study; APA is recommended as surface pretreatment for improved bond strength in restorative composite repairs. Elsevier 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10339018/ /pubmed/37455968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17786 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article AlOtaibi, AlFulwah A. Taher, Nadia M. Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title | Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title_full | Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title_fullStr | Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title_short | Effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of OMNICHROMA and Charisma Diamond ONE resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
title_sort | effect of surface treatment on the repair bond strength of omnichroma and charisma diamond one resin composites bonded to variable substrates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alotaibialfulwaha effectofsurfacetreatmentontherepairbondstrengthofomnichromaandcharismadiamondoneresincompositesbondedtovariablesubstrates AT tahernadiam effectofsurfacetreatmentontherepairbondstrengthofomnichromaandcharismadiamondoneresincompositesbondedtovariablesubstrates |