Cargando…

An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures

Biological tissues possess a high degree of structural complexity characterized by curvature and stratification of different tissue layers. Despite recent advances in in vitro technology, current engineering solutions do not comprise both of these features. In this paper, we present an integrated in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guazzelli, Nicole, Cacopardo, Ludovica, Corti, Alessandro, Ahluwalia, Arti
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457929
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.771
_version_ 1785071848046723072
author Guazzelli, Nicole
Cacopardo, Ludovica
Corti, Alessandro
Ahluwalia, Arti
author_facet Guazzelli, Nicole
Cacopardo, Ludovica
Corti, Alessandro
Ahluwalia, Arti
author_sort Guazzelli, Nicole
collection PubMed
description Biological tissues possess a high degree of structural complexity characterized by curvature and stratification of different tissue layers. Despite recent advances in in vitro technology, current engineering solutions do not comprise both of these features. In this paper, we present an integrated in silico–in vitro strategy for the design and fabrication of biological barriers with controlled curvature and architecture. Analytical and computational tools combined with advanced bioprinting methods are employed to optimize living inks for bioprinting-structured core–shell constructs based on alginate. A finite element model is used to compute the hindered diffusion and crosslinking phenomena involved in the formation of core–shell structures and to predict the width of the shell as a function of material parameters. Constructs with a solid alginate-based shell and a solid, liquid, or air core can be reproducibly printed using the workflow. As a proof of concept, epithelial cells and fibroblasts were bioprinted respectively in a liquid core (10 mg/mL Pluronic) and in a solid shell (20 mg/mL alginate plus 20 mg/mL gelatin, used for providing the cells with adhesive moieties). These constructs had a roundness of 97.6% and an average diameter of 1500 ±136 μm. Moreover, their viability was close to monolayer controls (74.12% ± 22.07%) after a week in culture, and the paracellular transport was twice that of cell-free constructs, indicating cell polarization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10339450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103394502023-07-14 An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures Guazzelli, Nicole Cacopardo, Ludovica Corti, Alessandro Ahluwalia, Arti Int J Bioprint Research Article Biological tissues possess a high degree of structural complexity characterized by curvature and stratification of different tissue layers. Despite recent advances in in vitro technology, current engineering solutions do not comprise both of these features. In this paper, we present an integrated in silico–in vitro strategy for the design and fabrication of biological barriers with controlled curvature and architecture. Analytical and computational tools combined with advanced bioprinting methods are employed to optimize living inks for bioprinting-structured core–shell constructs based on alginate. A finite element model is used to compute the hindered diffusion and crosslinking phenomena involved in the formation of core–shell structures and to predict the width of the shell as a function of material parameters. Constructs with a solid alginate-based shell and a solid, liquid, or air core can be reproducibly printed using the workflow. As a proof of concept, epithelial cells and fibroblasts were bioprinted respectively in a liquid core (10 mg/mL Pluronic) and in a solid shell (20 mg/mL alginate plus 20 mg/mL gelatin, used for providing the cells with adhesive moieties). These constructs had a roundness of 97.6% and an average diameter of 1500 ±136 μm. Moreover, their viability was close to monolayer controls (74.12% ± 22.07%) after a week in culture, and the paracellular transport was twice that of cell-free constructs, indicating cell polarization. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10339450/ /pubmed/37457929 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.771 Text en Copyright:© 2023, Guazzelli N, Cacopardo L, Corti A, et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guazzelli, Nicole
Cacopardo, Ludovica
Corti, Alessandro
Ahluwalia, Arti
An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title_full An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title_fullStr An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title_full_unstemmed An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title_short An integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
title_sort integrated in silico–in vitro approach for bioprinting core–shell bioarchitectures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457929
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.771
work_keys_str_mv AT guazzellinicole anintegratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT cacopardoludovica anintegratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT cortialessandro anintegratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT ahluwaliaarti anintegratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT guazzellinicole integratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT cacopardoludovica integratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT cortialessandro integratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures
AT ahluwaliaarti integratedinsilicoinvitroapproachforbioprintingcoreshellbioarchitectures