Cargando…
Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8 |
_version_ | 1785071858557648896 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Jinkai Yang, Xiaotian Jing, Wanli Guo, Xing Wang, Rui Zhou, Jiaming Xue, Yuan |
author_facet | Liu, Jinkai Yang, Xiaotian Jing, Wanli Guo, Xing Wang, Rui Zhou, Jiaming Xue, Yuan |
author_sort | Liu, Jinkai |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine was administered gradually, with oral administration of 30 mg in the first week and oral administration of 60 mg from the second week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were used to evaluate the severity of AS at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 63 eligible patients who received duloxetine therapy (n = 35) or non-drug therapy (n = 28) were included. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Significant improvements were found in VAS score compared with baseline in both groups (1.87 ± 0.81 vs 6.61 ± 1.16, 3.18 ± 0.67 vs 6.31 ± 1.40; P < 0.05 for all). Meanwhile, the VAS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). Besides, according to 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), the PCS score and MCS score are significantly higher than before the treatment in duloxetine group (PCS 62.82 ± 6.04 vs 44.36 ± 7.25, MCS 65.50 ± 4.53 vs 55.55 ± 6.06; P < 0.05 for all). And when we compared variables between the two groups, the PCS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MCS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). What’s more, EQ-5D score had significant improvements in the duloxetine group compared with the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral duloxetine has a better short-term outcome than conventional non-drug therapy in patients with axial symptoms following posterior decompression surgery in the cervical spine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10339503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103395032023-07-14 Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study Liu, Jinkai Yang, Xiaotian Jing, Wanli Guo, Xing Wang, Rui Zhou, Jiaming Xue, Yuan J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine was administered gradually, with oral administration of 30 mg in the first week and oral administration of 60 mg from the second week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were used to evaluate the severity of AS at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 63 eligible patients who received duloxetine therapy (n = 35) or non-drug therapy (n = 28) were included. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Significant improvements were found in VAS score compared with baseline in both groups (1.87 ± 0.81 vs 6.61 ± 1.16, 3.18 ± 0.67 vs 6.31 ± 1.40; P < 0.05 for all). Meanwhile, the VAS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). Besides, according to 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), the PCS score and MCS score are significantly higher than before the treatment in duloxetine group (PCS 62.82 ± 6.04 vs 44.36 ± 7.25, MCS 65.50 ± 4.53 vs 55.55 ± 6.06; P < 0.05 for all). And when we compared variables between the two groups, the PCS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MCS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). What’s more, EQ-5D score had significant improvements in the duloxetine group compared with the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral duloxetine has a better short-term outcome than conventional non-drug therapy in patients with axial symptoms following posterior decompression surgery in the cervical spine. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10339503/ /pubmed/37438835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Jinkai Yang, Xiaotian Jing, Wanli Guo, Xing Wang, Rui Zhou, Jiaming Xue, Yuan Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title | Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full | Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title_short | Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
title_sort | clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liujinkai clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT yangxiaotian clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT jingwanli clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT guoxing clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT wangrui clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT zhoujiaming clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT xueyuan clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy |