Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jinkai, Yang, Xiaotian, Jing, Wanli, Guo, Xing, Wang, Rui, Zhou, Jiaming, Xue, Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8
_version_ 1785071858557648896
author Liu, Jinkai
Yang, Xiaotian
Jing, Wanli
Guo, Xing
Wang, Rui
Zhou, Jiaming
Xue, Yuan
author_facet Liu, Jinkai
Yang, Xiaotian
Jing, Wanli
Guo, Xing
Wang, Rui
Zhou, Jiaming
Xue, Yuan
author_sort Liu, Jinkai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine was administered gradually, with oral administration of 30 mg in the first week and oral administration of 60 mg from the second week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were used to evaluate the severity of AS at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 63 eligible patients who received duloxetine therapy (n = 35) or non-drug therapy (n = 28) were included. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Significant improvements were found in VAS score compared with baseline in both groups (1.87 ± 0.81 vs 6.61 ± 1.16, 3.18 ± 0.67 vs 6.31 ± 1.40; P < 0.05 for all). Meanwhile, the VAS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). Besides, according to 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), the PCS score and MCS score are significantly higher than before the treatment in duloxetine group (PCS 62.82 ± 6.04 vs 44.36 ± 7.25, MCS 65.50 ± 4.53 vs 55.55 ± 6.06; P < 0.05 for all). And when we compared variables between the two groups, the PCS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MCS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). What’s more, EQ-5D score had significant improvements in the duloxetine group compared with the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral duloxetine has a better short-term outcome than conventional non-drug therapy in patients with axial symptoms following posterior decompression surgery in the cervical spine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10339503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103395032023-07-14 Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study Liu, Jinkai Yang, Xiaotian Jing, Wanli Guo, Xing Wang, Rui Zhou, Jiaming Xue, Yuan J Orthop Surg Res Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Patients with axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery treated by duloxetine or non-drug therapy from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed. Duloxetine was administered gradually, with oral administration of 30 mg in the first week and oral administration of 60 mg from the second week. Visual analogue scale (VAS), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) and EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire were used to evaluate the severity of AS at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 63 eligible patients who received duloxetine therapy (n = 35) or non-drug therapy (n = 28) were included. All patients were followed up for 6 months. Significant improvements were found in VAS score compared with baseline in both groups (1.87 ± 0.81 vs 6.61 ± 1.16, 3.18 ± 0.67 vs 6.31 ± 1.40; P < 0.05 for all). Meanwhile, the VAS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). Besides, according to 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), the PCS score and MCS score are significantly higher than before the treatment in duloxetine group (PCS 62.82 ± 6.04 vs 44.36 ± 7.25, MCS 65.50 ± 4.53 vs 55.55 ± 6.06; P < 0.05 for all). And when we compared variables between the two groups, the PCS score of the duloxetine group was significantly better than that of the non-drug therapy group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in MCS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). What’s more, EQ-5D score had significant improvements in the duloxetine group compared with the non-drug therapy group at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Oral duloxetine has a better short-term outcome than conventional non-drug therapy in patients with axial symptoms following posterior decompression surgery in the cervical spine. BioMed Central 2023-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10339503/ /pubmed/37438835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Jinkai
Yang, Xiaotian
Jing, Wanli
Guo, Xing
Wang, Rui
Zhou, Jiaming
Xue, Yuan
Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title_full Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title_short Clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
title_sort clinical efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of axial symptoms after posterior cervical spine surgery: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03970-8
work_keys_str_mv AT liujinkai clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT yangxiaotian clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT jingwanli clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT guoxing clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT wangrui clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT zhoujiaming clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT xueyuan clinicalefficacyofduloxetineinthetreatmentofaxialsymptomsafterposteriorcervicalspinesurgeryaretrospectivestudy