Cargando…

Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peabody, John W., Paculdo, David, de Belen, Enrico, Ganesan, Divya, Cooney, Isabella, Trujillo, Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w
_version_ 1785071894524854272
author Peabody, John W.
Paculdo, David
de Belen, Enrico
Ganesan, Divya
Cooney, Isabella
Trujillo, Nelson
author_facet Peabody, John W.
Paculdo, David
de Belen, Enrico
Ganesan, Divya
Cooney, Isabella
Trujillo, Nelson
author_sort Peabody, John W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical workup, diagnosis, and management of online, simulated patients with T2DM in a nationwide sample of cardiologists and primary care physicians, participants were randomly assigned to control or one of two intervention groups. Intervention participants had access to standard of care diagnostic tools plus a novel diagnostic CVD risk stratification test. RESULTS: In control, there was no change in CV risk stratification of simulated patients between baseline and round 2 (37.1 to 38.3%, p = 0.778). Pre-post analysis showed significant improvements in risk stratification in both Intervention 1 (38.7 to 65.3%) and Intervention 2 (41.9 to 65.8%) (p < 0.01) compared to controls. Both intervention groups significantly increased prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP1 receptor agonists versus control, + 18.9% for Intervention 1 (p = 0.020) and 1 + 9.4% for Intervention 2 (p = 0.014). Non-pharmacologic treatment improved significantly compared to control (+ 30.0% in Intervention 1 (p < 0.001) and + 22.8% in Intervention 2 (p = 0.001). Finally, monitoring HgbA1C, blood pressure, and follow-up visit frequency improved by + 20.3% (p = 0.004) in Intervention 1 and + 29.8% (p < 0.001) in Intervention 2 compared with control. CONCLUSION: Use of the novel test significantly improved CV risk stratification among T2DM patients. Statistically significant increases treatments were demonstrated, specifically SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor antagonists and recommendations of evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05237271 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10339653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103396532023-07-14 Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial Peabody, John W. Paculdo, David de Belen, Enrico Ganesan, Divya Cooney, Isabella Trujillo, Nelson Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical workup, diagnosis, and management of online, simulated patients with T2DM in a nationwide sample of cardiologists and primary care physicians, participants were randomly assigned to control or one of two intervention groups. Intervention participants had access to standard of care diagnostic tools plus a novel diagnostic CVD risk stratification test. RESULTS: In control, there was no change in CV risk stratification of simulated patients between baseline and round 2 (37.1 to 38.3%, p = 0.778). Pre-post analysis showed significant improvements in risk stratification in both Intervention 1 (38.7 to 65.3%) and Intervention 2 (41.9 to 65.8%) (p < 0.01) compared to controls. Both intervention groups significantly increased prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP1 receptor agonists versus control, + 18.9% for Intervention 1 (p = 0.020) and 1 + 9.4% for Intervention 2 (p = 0.014). Non-pharmacologic treatment improved significantly compared to control (+ 30.0% in Intervention 1 (p < 0.001) and + 22.8% in Intervention 2 (p = 0.001). Finally, monitoring HgbA1C, blood pressure, and follow-up visit frequency improved by + 20.3% (p = 0.004) in Intervention 1 and + 29.8% (p < 0.001) in Intervention 2 compared with control. CONCLUSION: Use of the novel test significantly improved CV risk stratification among T2DM patients. Statistically significant increases treatments were demonstrated, specifically SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor antagonists and recommendations of evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05237271 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w. BioMed Central 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10339653/ /pubmed/37438853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Peabody, John W.
Paculdo, David
de Belen, Enrico
Ganesan, Divya
Cooney, Isabella
Trujillo, Nelson
Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w
work_keys_str_mv AT peabodyjohnw clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paculdodavid clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT debelenenrico clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ganesandivya clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cooneyisabella clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT trujillonelson clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial