Cargando…
Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w |
_version_ | 1785071894524854272 |
---|---|
author | Peabody, John W. Paculdo, David de Belen, Enrico Ganesan, Divya Cooney, Isabella Trujillo, Nelson |
author_facet | Peabody, John W. Paculdo, David de Belen, Enrico Ganesan, Divya Cooney, Isabella Trujillo, Nelson |
author_sort | Peabody, John W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical workup, diagnosis, and management of online, simulated patients with T2DM in a nationwide sample of cardiologists and primary care physicians, participants were randomly assigned to control or one of two intervention groups. Intervention participants had access to standard of care diagnostic tools plus a novel diagnostic CVD risk stratification test. RESULTS: In control, there was no change in CV risk stratification of simulated patients between baseline and round 2 (37.1 to 38.3%, p = 0.778). Pre-post analysis showed significant improvements in risk stratification in both Intervention 1 (38.7 to 65.3%) and Intervention 2 (41.9 to 65.8%) (p < 0.01) compared to controls. Both intervention groups significantly increased prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP1 receptor agonists versus control, + 18.9% for Intervention 1 (p = 0.020) and 1 + 9.4% for Intervention 2 (p = 0.014). Non-pharmacologic treatment improved significantly compared to control (+ 30.0% in Intervention 1 (p < 0.001) and + 22.8% in Intervention 2 (p = 0.001). Finally, monitoring HgbA1C, blood pressure, and follow-up visit frequency improved by + 20.3% (p = 0.004) in Intervention 1 and + 29.8% (p < 0.001) in Intervention 2 compared with control. CONCLUSION: Use of the novel test significantly improved CV risk stratification among T2DM patients. Statistically significant increases treatments were demonstrated, specifically SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor antagonists and recommendations of evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05237271 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10339653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103396532023-07-14 Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial Peabody, John W. Paculdo, David de Belen, Enrico Ganesan, Divya Cooney, Isabella Trujillo, Nelson Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND: The risk for and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is often incorrect and delayed. We wished to determine if a novel test improved physicians’ ability to risk stratify, diagnose, and treat patients with T2DM. METHODS: In a 2-phase randomized controlled trial comparing the clinical workup, diagnosis, and management of online, simulated patients with T2DM in a nationwide sample of cardiologists and primary care physicians, participants were randomly assigned to control or one of two intervention groups. Intervention participants had access to standard of care diagnostic tools plus a novel diagnostic CVD risk stratification test. RESULTS: In control, there was no change in CV risk stratification of simulated patients between baseline and round 2 (37.1 to 38.3%, p = 0.778). Pre-post analysis showed significant improvements in risk stratification in both Intervention 1 (38.7 to 65.3%) and Intervention 2 (41.9 to 65.8%) (p < 0.01) compared to controls. Both intervention groups significantly increased prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors/GLP1 receptor agonists versus control, + 18.9% for Intervention 1 (p = 0.020) and 1 + 9.4% for Intervention 2 (p = 0.014). Non-pharmacologic treatment improved significantly compared to control (+ 30.0% in Intervention 1 (p < 0.001) and + 22.8% in Intervention 2 (p = 0.001). Finally, monitoring HgbA1C, blood pressure, and follow-up visit frequency improved by + 20.3% (p = 0.004) in Intervention 1 and + 29.8% (p < 0.001) in Intervention 2 compared with control. CONCLUSION: Use of the novel test significantly improved CV risk stratification among T2DM patients. Statistically significant increases treatments were demonstrated, specifically SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor antagonists and recommendations of evidence-based non-pharmacologic treatments. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05237271 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w. BioMed Central 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10339653/ /pubmed/37438853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Peabody, John W. Paculdo, David de Belen, Enrico Ganesan, Divya Cooney, Isabella Trujillo, Nelson Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | clinical utility of a novel test for assessing cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37438853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-023-01122-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peabodyjohnw clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paculdodavid clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT debelenenrico clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ganesandivya clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cooneyisabella clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT trujillonelson clinicalutilityofanoveltestforassessingcardiovasculardiseaseriskintype2diabetesarandomizedcontrolledtrial |