Cargando…

Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches

[Image: see text] Fast and accurate estimation of electronic coupling matrix elements between molecules is essential for the simulation of charge transfer phenomena in chemistry, materials science, and biology. Here we investigate neural-network-based coupling estimators combined with different prot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hafizi, Roohollah, Elsner, Jan, Blumberger, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00184
_version_ 1785071898782072832
author Hafizi, Roohollah
Elsner, Jan
Blumberger, Jochen
author_facet Hafizi, Roohollah
Elsner, Jan
Blumberger, Jochen
author_sort Hafizi, Roohollah
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Fast and accurate estimation of electronic coupling matrix elements between molecules is essential for the simulation of charge transfer phenomena in chemistry, materials science, and biology. Here we investigate neural-network-based coupling estimators combined with different protocols for sampling reference data (random, farthest point, and query by committee) and compare their performance to the physics-based analytic overlap method (AOM), introduced previously. We find that neural network approaches can give smaller errors than AOM, in particular smaller maximum errors, while they require an order of magnitude more reference data than AOM, typically one hundred to several hundred training points, down from several thousand required in previous ML works. A Δ-ML approach taking AOM as a baseline is found to give the best overall performance at a relatively small computational overhead of about a factor of 2. Highly flexible π-conjugated organic molecules like non-fullerene acceptors are found to be a particularly challenging case for ML because of the varying (de)localization of the frontier orbitals for different intramolecular geometries sampled along molecular dynamics trajectories. Here the local symmetry functions used in ML are insufficient, and long-range descriptors are expected to give improved performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10339673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103396732023-07-14 Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches Hafizi, Roohollah Elsner, Jan Blumberger, Jochen J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] Fast and accurate estimation of electronic coupling matrix elements between molecules is essential for the simulation of charge transfer phenomena in chemistry, materials science, and biology. Here we investigate neural-network-based coupling estimators combined with different protocols for sampling reference data (random, farthest point, and query by committee) and compare their performance to the physics-based analytic overlap method (AOM), introduced previously. We find that neural network approaches can give smaller errors than AOM, in particular smaller maximum errors, while they require an order of magnitude more reference data than AOM, typically one hundred to several hundred training points, down from several thousand required in previous ML works. A Δ-ML approach taking AOM as a baseline is found to give the best overall performance at a relatively small computational overhead of about a factor of 2. Highly flexible π-conjugated organic molecules like non-fullerene acceptors are found to be a particularly challenging case for ML because of the varying (de)localization of the frontier orbitals for different intramolecular geometries sampled along molecular dynamics trajectories. Here the local symmetry functions used in ML are insufficient, and long-range descriptors are expected to give improved performance. American Chemical Society 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10339673/ /pubmed/37345885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00184 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Hafizi, Roohollah
Elsner, Jan
Blumberger, Jochen
Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title_full Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title_fullStr Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title_short Ultrafast Electronic Coupling Estimators: Neural Networks versus Physics-Based Approaches
title_sort ultrafast electronic coupling estimators: neural networks versus physics-based approaches
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37345885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00184
work_keys_str_mv AT hafiziroohollah ultrafastelectroniccouplingestimatorsneuralnetworksversusphysicsbasedapproaches
AT elsnerjan ultrafastelectroniccouplingestimatorsneuralnetworksversusphysicsbasedapproaches
AT blumbergerjochen ultrafastelectroniccouplingestimatorsneuralnetworksversusphysicsbasedapproaches