Cargando…

Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition

[Image: see text] Advances in molecular dynamics (MD) software alongside enhanced computational power and hardware have allowed for MD simulations to significantly expand our knowledge of biomolecular structure, dynamics, and interactions. Furthermore, it has allowed for the extension of conformatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Love, Olivia, Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo, Zgarbová, Marie, Šponer, Jiří, Jurečka, Petr, Cheatham, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00233
_version_ 1785071899528658944
author Love, Olivia
Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo
Zgarbová, Marie
Šponer, Jiří
Jurečka, Petr
Cheatham, Thomas E.
author_facet Love, Olivia
Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo
Zgarbová, Marie
Šponer, Jiří
Jurečka, Petr
Cheatham, Thomas E.
author_sort Love, Olivia
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Advances in molecular dynamics (MD) software alongside enhanced computational power and hardware have allowed for MD simulations to significantly expand our knowledge of biomolecular structure, dynamics, and interactions. Furthermore, it has allowed for the extension of conformational sampling times from nanoseconds to the microsecond level and beyond. This has not only made convergence of conformational ensembles through comprehensive sampling possible but consequently exposed deficiencies and allowed the community to overcome limitations in the available force fields. The reproducibility and accuracy of the force fields are imperative in order to produce biologically relevant data. The Amber nucleic acid force fields have been used widely since the mid-1980s, and improvement of these force fields has been a community effort with several artifacts revealed, corrected, and reevaluated by various research groups. Here, we focus on the Amber force fields for use with double-stranded DNA and present the assessment of two recently developed force field parameter sets (OL21 and Tumuc1). Extensive MD simulations were performed with six test systems and two different water models. We observe the improvement of OL21 and Tumuc1 compared to previous generations of the Amber DNA force. We did not detect any significant improvement in the performance of Tumuc1 compared to OL21 despite the reparameterization of bonded force field terms in the former; however, we did note discrepancies in Tumuc1 when modeling Z-DNA sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10339676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103396762023-07-14 Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition Love, Olivia Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo Zgarbová, Marie Šponer, Jiří Jurečka, Petr Cheatham, Thomas E. J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] Advances in molecular dynamics (MD) software alongside enhanced computational power and hardware have allowed for MD simulations to significantly expand our knowledge of biomolecular structure, dynamics, and interactions. Furthermore, it has allowed for the extension of conformational sampling times from nanoseconds to the microsecond level and beyond. This has not only made convergence of conformational ensembles through comprehensive sampling possible but consequently exposed deficiencies and allowed the community to overcome limitations in the available force fields. The reproducibility and accuracy of the force fields are imperative in order to produce biologically relevant data. The Amber nucleic acid force fields have been used widely since the mid-1980s, and improvement of these force fields has been a community effort with several artifacts revealed, corrected, and reevaluated by various research groups. Here, we focus on the Amber force fields for use with double-stranded DNA and present the assessment of two recently developed force field parameter sets (OL21 and Tumuc1). Extensive MD simulations were performed with six test systems and two different water models. We observe the improvement of OL21 and Tumuc1 compared to previous generations of the Amber DNA force. We did not detect any significant improvement in the performance of Tumuc1 compared to OL21 despite the reparameterization of bonded force field terms in the former; however, we did note discrepancies in Tumuc1 when modeling Z-DNA sequences. American Chemical Society 2023-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10339676/ /pubmed/37340948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00233 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Love, Olivia
Galindo-Murillo, Rodrigo
Zgarbová, Marie
Šponer, Jiří
Jurečka, Petr
Cheatham, Thomas E.
Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title_full Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title_fullStr Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title_short Assessing the Current State of Amber Force Field Modifications for DNA—2023 Edition
title_sort assessing the current state of amber force field modifications for dna—2023 edition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37340948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00233
work_keys_str_mv AT loveolivia assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition
AT galindomurillorodrigo assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition
AT zgarbovamarie assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition
AT sponerjiri assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition
AT jureckapetr assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition
AT cheathamthomase assessingthecurrentstateofamberforcefieldmodificationsfordna2023edition