Cargando…
In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, personalized and comprehensive approaches to combat treatment resistances and failures are limited due to the highly heterogeneous, resistive, and invasive phenotype of GBM tumors. We present an integrative genomic, in vitro, and in vivo functional treatment paradigm for GBM...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133289 |
_version_ | 1785071972592386048 |
---|---|
author | Rajan, Robin G. Fernandez-Vega, Virneliz Sperry, Jantzen Nakashima, Jonathan Do, Long H. Andrews, Warren Boca, Simina Islam, Rezwanul Chowdhary, Sajeel A. Seldin, Jan Souza, Glauco R. Scampavia, Louis Hanafy, Khalid A. Vrionis, Frank D. Spicer, Timothy P. |
author_facet | Rajan, Robin G. Fernandez-Vega, Virneliz Sperry, Jantzen Nakashima, Jonathan Do, Long H. Andrews, Warren Boca, Simina Islam, Rezwanul Chowdhary, Sajeel A. Seldin, Jan Souza, Glauco R. Scampavia, Louis Hanafy, Khalid A. Vrionis, Frank D. Spicer, Timothy P. |
author_sort | Rajan, Robin G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, personalized and comprehensive approaches to combat treatment resistances and failures are limited due to the highly heterogeneous, resistive, and invasive phenotype of GBM tumors. We present an integrative genomic, in vitro, and in vivo functional treatment paradigm for GBM. Our study utilizes patient-derived 3D organoids, as they have better concordance with the parent tumor for the in vitro assays and in vivo PDX mouse model. In vitro HTS of the 3D organoids for effective drugs combined with RNAseq analysis to identify differentially enriched genomic pathways and gene targets has enabled rapid generation of clinically relevant information. When supplemented with validation using in vivo PDX mouse models of tumor growth, this creates a robust precision medicine paradigm. Rapidly implemented individualized drug response prediction models thus provide actionable information for the physician to combat recurrences or treatment resistances in GBM. Moreover, it is a scalable workflow, which includes compounds not yet approved for GBM but showing promise in clinical trials. ABSTRACT: Background: Genomic profiling cannot solely predict the complexity of how tumor cells behave in their in vivo microenvironment and their susceptibility to therapies. The aim of the study was to establish a functional drug prediction model utilizing patient-derived GBM tumor samples for in vitro testing of drug efficacy followed by in vivo validation to overcome the disadvantages of a strict pharmacogenomics approach. Methods: High-throughput in vitro pharmacologic testing of patient-derived GBM tumors cultured as 3D organoids offered a cost-effective, clinically and phenotypically relevant model, inclusive of tumor plasticity and stroma. RNAseq analysis supplemented this 128-compound screening to predict more efficacious and patient-specific drug combinations with additional tumor stemness evaluated using flow cytometry. In vivo PDX mouse models rapidly validated (50 days) and determined mutational influence alongside of drug efficacy. We present a representative GBM case of three tumors resected at initial presentation, at first recurrence without any treatment, and at a second recurrence following radiation and chemotherapy, all from the same patient. Results: Molecular and in vitro screening helped identify effective drug targets against several pathways as well as synergistic drug combinations of cobimetinib and vemurafenib for this patient, supported in part by in vivo tumor growth assessment. Each tumor iteration showed significantly varying stemness and drug resistance. Conclusions: Our integrative model utilizing molecular, in vitro, and in vivo approaches provides direct evidence of a patient’s tumor response drifting with treatment and time, as demonstrated by dynamic changes in their tumor profile, which may affect how one would address that drift pharmacologically. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10339991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103399912023-07-14 In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma Rajan, Robin G. Fernandez-Vega, Virneliz Sperry, Jantzen Nakashima, Jonathan Do, Long H. Andrews, Warren Boca, Simina Islam, Rezwanul Chowdhary, Sajeel A. Seldin, Jan Souza, Glauco R. Scampavia, Louis Hanafy, Khalid A. Vrionis, Frank D. Spicer, Timothy P. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: To date, personalized and comprehensive approaches to combat treatment resistances and failures are limited due to the highly heterogeneous, resistive, and invasive phenotype of GBM tumors. We present an integrative genomic, in vitro, and in vivo functional treatment paradigm for GBM. Our study utilizes patient-derived 3D organoids, as they have better concordance with the parent tumor for the in vitro assays and in vivo PDX mouse model. In vitro HTS of the 3D organoids for effective drugs combined with RNAseq analysis to identify differentially enriched genomic pathways and gene targets has enabled rapid generation of clinically relevant information. When supplemented with validation using in vivo PDX mouse models of tumor growth, this creates a robust precision medicine paradigm. Rapidly implemented individualized drug response prediction models thus provide actionable information for the physician to combat recurrences or treatment resistances in GBM. Moreover, it is a scalable workflow, which includes compounds not yet approved for GBM but showing promise in clinical trials. ABSTRACT: Background: Genomic profiling cannot solely predict the complexity of how tumor cells behave in their in vivo microenvironment and their susceptibility to therapies. The aim of the study was to establish a functional drug prediction model utilizing patient-derived GBM tumor samples for in vitro testing of drug efficacy followed by in vivo validation to overcome the disadvantages of a strict pharmacogenomics approach. Methods: High-throughput in vitro pharmacologic testing of patient-derived GBM tumors cultured as 3D organoids offered a cost-effective, clinically and phenotypically relevant model, inclusive of tumor plasticity and stroma. RNAseq analysis supplemented this 128-compound screening to predict more efficacious and patient-specific drug combinations with additional tumor stemness evaluated using flow cytometry. In vivo PDX mouse models rapidly validated (50 days) and determined mutational influence alongside of drug efficacy. We present a representative GBM case of three tumors resected at initial presentation, at first recurrence without any treatment, and at a second recurrence following radiation and chemotherapy, all from the same patient. Results: Molecular and in vitro screening helped identify effective drug targets against several pathways as well as synergistic drug combinations of cobimetinib and vemurafenib for this patient, supported in part by in vivo tumor growth assessment. Each tumor iteration showed significantly varying stemness and drug resistance. Conclusions: Our integrative model utilizing molecular, in vitro, and in vivo approaches provides direct evidence of a patient’s tumor response drifting with treatment and time, as demonstrated by dynamic changes in their tumor profile, which may affect how one would address that drift pharmacologically. MDPI 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10339991/ /pubmed/37444398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133289 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rajan, Robin G. Fernandez-Vega, Virneliz Sperry, Jantzen Nakashima, Jonathan Do, Long H. Andrews, Warren Boca, Simina Islam, Rezwanul Chowdhary, Sajeel A. Seldin, Jan Souza, Glauco R. Scampavia, Louis Hanafy, Khalid A. Vrionis, Frank D. Spicer, Timothy P. In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title | In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title_full | In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title_fullStr | In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title_short | In Vitro and In Vivo Drug-Response Profiling Using Patient-Derived High-Grade Glioma |
title_sort | in vitro and in vivo drug-response profiling using patient-derived high-grade glioma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10339991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444398 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajanrobing invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT fernandezvegavirneliz invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT sperryjantzen invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT nakashimajonathan invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT dolongh invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT andrewswarren invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT bocasimina invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT islamrezwanul invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT chowdharysajeela invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT seldinjan invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT souzaglaucor invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT scampavialouis invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT hanafykhalida invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT vrionisfrankd invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma AT spicertimothyp invitroandinvivodrugresponseprofilingusingpatientderivedhighgradeglioma |