Cargando…

Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of any type of gynecological cancer because it is diagnosed in advanced stages and its recurrence rate is about 80%. The standard treatment for recurrences of ovarian cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Climent, Maria Teresa, Serra, Anna, Llueca, Maria, Llueca, Antoni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10340282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133470
_version_ 1785072041358000128
author Climent, Maria Teresa
Serra, Anna
Llueca, Maria
Llueca, Antoni
author_facet Climent, Maria Teresa
Serra, Anna
Llueca, Maria
Llueca, Antoni
author_sort Climent, Maria Teresa
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of any type of gynecological cancer because it is diagnosed in advanced stages and its recurrence rate is about 80%. The standard treatment for recurrences of ovarian cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may be a treatment option for selected patients. We evaluated three randomized studies to determine the effect on overall survival and disease-free survival. This analysis shows better results in this group than in the patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone, with statistically significant differences. This benefit is maintained when analyzing patients in whom complete cytoreduction is achieved. The main limitation of the selected studies is the different criteria for selecting patients for secondary cytoreduction, which is why prospective studies are needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. ABSTRACT: Background: The second cytoreductive surgery performed for a patient who has recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Our study analyzes overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for cytoreductive surgery in addition to chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer instead of chemotherapy alone. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews to select randomized controlled studies. In total, three randomized studies were used, employing a total of 1249 patients. Results: The results of our meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials identified significant differences in OS (HR = 0.83, IC 95% 0.70–0.99, p < 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.63, IC 95% 0.55–0.72, p < 0.000001). A subgroup analysis comparing complete cytoreductive surgery and surgery with residual tumor achieved better results for both OS (HR = 0.65, IC 95% 0.49–0.86, p = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 0.67, IC 95% 0.53–0.82, p = 0.0008), with statistical significance. Conclusions: A complete secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) demonstrates an improvement in the OS and DFS, and this benefit is most evident in cases where complete cytoreductive surgery is achieved. The challenge is the correct patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery to improve the results of this approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10340282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103402822023-07-14 Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Climent, Maria Teresa Serra, Anna Llueca, Maria Llueca, Antoni Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of any type of gynecological cancer because it is diagnosed in advanced stages and its recurrence rate is about 80%. The standard treatment for recurrences of ovarian cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may be a treatment option for selected patients. We evaluated three randomized studies to determine the effect on overall survival and disease-free survival. This analysis shows better results in this group than in the patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone, with statistically significant differences. This benefit is maintained when analyzing patients in whom complete cytoreduction is achieved. The main limitation of the selected studies is the different criteria for selecting patients for secondary cytoreduction, which is why prospective studies are needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. ABSTRACT: Background: The second cytoreductive surgery performed for a patient who has recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Our study analyzes overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for cytoreductive surgery in addition to chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer instead of chemotherapy alone. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews to select randomized controlled studies. In total, three randomized studies were used, employing a total of 1249 patients. Results: The results of our meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials identified significant differences in OS (HR = 0.83, IC 95% 0.70–0.99, p < 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.63, IC 95% 0.55–0.72, p < 0.000001). A subgroup analysis comparing complete cytoreductive surgery and surgery with residual tumor achieved better results for both OS (HR = 0.65, IC 95% 0.49–0.86, p = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 0.67, IC 95% 0.53–0.82, p = 0.0008), with statistical significance. Conclusions: A complete secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) demonstrates an improvement in the OS and DFS, and this benefit is most evident in cases where complete cytoreductive surgery is achieved. The challenge is the correct patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery to improve the results of this approach. MDPI 2023-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10340282/ /pubmed/37444580 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133470 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Climent, Maria Teresa
Serra, Anna
Llueca, Maria
Llueca, Antoni
Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10340282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444580
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133470
work_keys_str_mv AT climentmariateresa surgeryinrecurrentovariancancerametaanalysis
AT serraanna surgeryinrecurrentovariancancerametaanalysis
AT lluecamaria surgeryinrecurrentovariancancerametaanalysis
AT lluecaantoni surgeryinrecurrentovariancancerametaanalysis