Cargando…

Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality

The present study aimed to test the synbiotic PoultryStar(®) sol(US) delivered in ovo to evaluate its effect on hatchability, productive performance and meat quality, compared to its post-hatch administration in water. On the twelfth day of embryonic incubation, 1200 fertile eggs were divided into s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavaniello, Siria, De Marzo, Davide, Bednarczyk, Marek, Palazzo, Marisa, Zejnelhoxha, Sanije, Wu, Mengjun, Peng, Meng, Stadnicka, Katarzyna, Maiorano, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10340745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12132470
_version_ 1785072152921243648
author Tavaniello, Siria
De Marzo, Davide
Bednarczyk, Marek
Palazzo, Marisa
Zejnelhoxha, Sanije
Wu, Mengjun
Peng, Meng
Stadnicka, Katarzyna
Maiorano, Giuseppe
author_facet Tavaniello, Siria
De Marzo, Davide
Bednarczyk, Marek
Palazzo, Marisa
Zejnelhoxha, Sanije
Wu, Mengjun
Peng, Meng
Stadnicka, Katarzyna
Maiorano, Giuseppe
author_sort Tavaniello, Siria
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to test the synbiotic PoultryStar(®) sol(US) delivered in ovo to evaluate its effect on hatchability, productive performance and meat quality, compared to its post-hatch administration in water. On the twelfth day of embryonic incubation, 1200 fertile eggs were divided into synbiotic groups injected with 2 mg/embryo (T1) and 3 mg/embryo (T2), a saline group injected with physiological saline and an uninjected control group (C). After hatching, 120 male chicks/group were reared and chicks from the saline group were supplemented with the synbiotic via drinking water (T3). Hatchability was low in both T1 and T2 groups. Growth performance was not affected by the treatments. However, in the second rearing phase (15–36 days), birds from the C and T3 groups were heavier than T1 birds, due to a higher feed intake and daily weight gain. Neither route of synbiotic administration influenced final body weight (at 56 days), weight and yield of the carcass or commercial cuts. Physico-chemical properties, total lipid, cholesterol and fatty acid composition of breast muscle were not affected by the treatments. Considering its exploratory nature, this study has raised many questions that need further investigation, such as the bioactive combination and the effect on embryonic development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10340745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103407452023-07-14 Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality Tavaniello, Siria De Marzo, Davide Bednarczyk, Marek Palazzo, Marisa Zejnelhoxha, Sanije Wu, Mengjun Peng, Meng Stadnicka, Katarzyna Maiorano, Giuseppe Foods Article The present study aimed to test the synbiotic PoultryStar(®) sol(US) delivered in ovo to evaluate its effect on hatchability, productive performance and meat quality, compared to its post-hatch administration in water. On the twelfth day of embryonic incubation, 1200 fertile eggs were divided into synbiotic groups injected with 2 mg/embryo (T1) and 3 mg/embryo (T2), a saline group injected with physiological saline and an uninjected control group (C). After hatching, 120 male chicks/group were reared and chicks from the saline group were supplemented with the synbiotic via drinking water (T3). Hatchability was low in both T1 and T2 groups. Growth performance was not affected by the treatments. However, in the second rearing phase (15–36 days), birds from the C and T3 groups were heavier than T1 birds, due to a higher feed intake and daily weight gain. Neither route of synbiotic administration influenced final body weight (at 56 days), weight and yield of the carcass or commercial cuts. Physico-chemical properties, total lipid, cholesterol and fatty acid composition of breast muscle were not affected by the treatments. Considering its exploratory nature, this study has raised many questions that need further investigation, such as the bioactive combination and the effect on embryonic development. MDPI 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10340745/ /pubmed/37444208 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12132470 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tavaniello, Siria
De Marzo, Davide
Bednarczyk, Marek
Palazzo, Marisa
Zejnelhoxha, Sanije
Wu, Mengjun
Peng, Meng
Stadnicka, Katarzyna
Maiorano, Giuseppe
Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title_full Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title_fullStr Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title_full_unstemmed Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title_short Influence of a Commercial Synbiotic Administered In Ovo and In-Water on Broiler Chicken Performance and Meat Quality
title_sort influence of a commercial synbiotic administered in ovo and in-water on broiler chicken performance and meat quality
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10340745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444208
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12132470
work_keys_str_mv AT tavaniellosiria influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT demarzodavide influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT bednarczykmarek influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT palazzomarisa influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT zejnelhoxhasanije influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT wumengjun influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT pengmeng influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT stadnickakatarzyna influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality
AT maioranogiuseppe influenceofacommercialsynbioticadministeredinovoandinwateronbroilerchickenperformanceandmeatquality