Cargando…

Development of the Japanese Version of Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire—Revised-2: Measurement and Psychometric Properties

Tools to evaluate pregnancy-specific anxiety are lacking in Japan. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire—Revised-2. After scale translation and cognitive interviews, we conducted a cross-sectional study among 120 ≥18-year-old, singleton (pregna...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirabe, Ritsuko, Okada, Hiroko, Okuhara, Tsuyoshi, Yokota, Rie, Kiuchi, Takahiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341067/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11131935
Descripción
Sumario:Tools to evaluate pregnancy-specific anxiety are lacking in Japan. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire—Revised-2. After scale translation and cognitive interviews, we conducted a cross-sectional study among 120 ≥18-year-old, singleton (pregnant with one baby) Japanese women before 15 weeks of pregnancy, recruited from four facilities. A total of 112 women completed the questionnaires. We tested the internal consistency, measurement error and reliability, structural validity, measurement invariance across nulliparous and parous women, construct validity by calculating omega, standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multigroup CFA, multitrait-scaling analysis, correlational analyses with other measurements, and t-test to compare nulliparous and parous groups. Omega was 0.90 for the total score. SEM was 3.4 and ICC was 0.76. The CFA revealed an optimal fit for the three-factor model based on the original scale. Multigroup CFA supported measurement invariance across the nulliparous and parous groups, and multitrait-scaling analysis revealed 100% scaling success. The correlation coefficients with other scales of childbirth anxiety and general anxiety were 0.70 and 0.24. The mean total score of the nulliparous women was higher than that of the parous women (34.5 vs. 30.3, p = 0.001). Therefore, the scale was determined to have good validity and reliability.