Cargando…

Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Population-based colorectal cancer screening programs have increased the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaffalon, Diana, Daca-Alvarez, Maria, Saez de Gordoa, Karmele, Pellisé, María
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133511
_version_ 1785072186836385792
author Zaffalon, Diana
Daca-Alvarez, Maria
Saez de Gordoa, Karmele
Pellisé, María
author_facet Zaffalon, Diana
Daca-Alvarez, Maria
Saez de Gordoa, Karmele
Pellisé, María
author_sort Zaffalon, Diana
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Population-based colorectal cancer screening programs have increased the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histological criteria associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis. Only 2–10.5% of those have lymph node metastasis, and the residual tumor is present in less than 20%, leading to overtreatment. Additional surgery increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, and recent evidence shows that it may not impact the prognosis for pT1. This article reviews the limitations of histological evaluation, treatment modalities and prognosis, adverse effects, and new possibilities of endoscopic treatment. ABSTRACT: Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs has led to increases in the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histological high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria are suboptimal, with no consensus among clinical guidelines, heterogeneity in definitions and assessment, and poor concordance in evaluation, and recent evidence suggests that some of these criteria considered high risk might not necessarily affect individual prognosis. Current criteria classify most patients as high risk with an indication for additional surgery, but only 2–10.5% have lymph node metastasis, and the residual tumor is present in less than 20%, leading to overtreatment. Patients with pT1 colorectal cancer have excellent disease-free survival, and recent evidence indicates that the type of treatment, whether endoscopic or surgical, does not significantly impact prognosis. As a result, the protective role of surgery is questionable. Moreover, surgery is a more aggressive treatment option, with the potential for higher morbidity and mortality rates. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent evidence on the clinical management of pT1 colorectal cancer. The review analyzes the limitations of histological evaluation, the prognostic implications of histological risk status and the treatment performed, the adverse effects associated with both endoscopic and surgical treatments, and new advances in endoscopic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10341121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103411212023-07-14 Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer Zaffalon, Diana Daca-Alvarez, Maria Saez de Gordoa, Karmele Pellisé, María Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Population-based colorectal cancer screening programs have increased the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histological criteria associated with the presence of lymph node metastasis. Only 2–10.5% of those have lymph node metastasis, and the residual tumor is present in less than 20%, leading to overtreatment. Additional surgery increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, and recent evidence shows that it may not impact the prognosis for pT1. This article reviews the limitations of histological evaluation, treatment modalities and prognosis, adverse effects, and new possibilities of endoscopic treatment. ABSTRACT: Implementation of population-based colorectal cancer screening programs has led to increases in the incidence of pT1 colorectal cancer. These incipient invasive cancers have a very good prognosis and can be treated locally, but more than half of these cases are treated with surgery due to the presence of histological high-risk criteria. These high-risk criteria are suboptimal, with no consensus among clinical guidelines, heterogeneity in definitions and assessment, and poor concordance in evaluation, and recent evidence suggests that some of these criteria considered high risk might not necessarily affect individual prognosis. Current criteria classify most patients as high risk with an indication for additional surgery, but only 2–10.5% have lymph node metastasis, and the residual tumor is present in less than 20%, leading to overtreatment. Patients with pT1 colorectal cancer have excellent disease-free survival, and recent evidence indicates that the type of treatment, whether endoscopic or surgical, does not significantly impact prognosis. As a result, the protective role of surgery is questionable. Moreover, surgery is a more aggressive treatment option, with the potential for higher morbidity and mortality rates. This article presents a comprehensive review of recent evidence on the clinical management of pT1 colorectal cancer. The review analyzes the limitations of histological evaluation, the prognostic implications of histological risk status and the treatment performed, the adverse effects associated with both endoscopic and surgical treatments, and new advances in endoscopic treatment. MDPI 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10341121/ /pubmed/37444621 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133511 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zaffalon, Diana
Daca-Alvarez, Maria
Saez de Gordoa, Karmele
Pellisé, María
Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title_full Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title_fullStr Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title_short Dilemmas in the Clinical Management of pT1 Colorectal Cancer
title_sort dilemmas in the clinical management of pt1 colorectal cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37444621
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133511
work_keys_str_mv AT zaffalondiana dilemmasintheclinicalmanagementofpt1colorectalcancer
AT dacaalvarezmaria dilemmasintheclinicalmanagementofpt1colorectalcancer
AT saezdegordoakarmele dilemmasintheclinicalmanagementofpt1colorectalcancer
AT pellisemaria dilemmasintheclinicalmanagementofpt1colorectalcancer