Cargando…

Geographic Atrophy Segmentation Using Multimodal Deep Learning

PURPOSE: To examine deep learning (DL)–based methods for accurate segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared (NIR) images. METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized imaging data from study eyes of patients enrolled in Proxima A and B (NC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spaide, Theodore, Jiang, Jiaxiang, Patil, Jasmine, Anegondi, Neha, Steffen, Verena, Kawczynski, Michael G., Newton, Elizabeth M., Rabe, Christina, Gao, Simon S., Lee, Aaron Y., Holz, Frank G., Sadda, SriniVas, Schmitz-Valckenberg, Steffen, Ferrara, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37428131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.7.10
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To examine deep learning (DL)–based methods for accurate segmentation of geographic atrophy (GA) lesions using fundus autofluorescence (FAF) and near-infrared (NIR) images. METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized imaging data from study eyes of patients enrolled in Proxima A and B (NCT02479386; NCT02399072) natural history studies of GA. Two multimodal DL networks (UNet and YNet) were used to automatically segment GA lesions on FAF; segmentation accuracy was compared with annotations by experienced graders. The training data set comprised 940 image pairs (FAF and NIR) from 183 patients in Proxima B; the test data set comprised 497 image pairs from 154 patients in Proxima A. Dice coefficient scores, Bland–Altman plots, and Pearson correlation coefficient (r) were used to assess performance. RESULTS: On the test set, Dice scores for the DL network to grader comparison ranged from 0.89 to 0.92 for screening visit; Dice score between graders was 0.94. GA lesion area correlations (r) for YNet versus grader, UNet versus grader, and between graders were 0.981, 0.959, and 0.995, respectively. Longitudinal GA lesion area enlargement correlations (r) for screening to 12 months (n = 53) were lower (0.741, 0.622, and 0.890, respectively) compared with the cross-sectional results at screening. Longitudinal correlations (r) from screening to 6 months (n = 77) were even lower (0.294, 0.248, and 0.686, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal DL networks to segment GA lesions can produce accurate results comparable with expert graders. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: DL-based tools may support efficient and individualized assessment of patients with GA in clinical research and practice.