Cargando…

Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction

Reversing the pulse polarity, i.e., changing the electric field direction by 180°, inhibits electroporation and electrostimulation by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEPs). This feature, known as “bipolar cancellation,” enables selective remote targeting with nsEPs and reduces the neuromuscular side ef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Vitalii, Semenov, Iurii, Kiester, Allen S., Keppler, Mark A., Ibey, Bennett L., Bixler, Joel N., Colunga Biancatelli, Ruben M. L., Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310921
_version_ 1785072382730305536
author Kim, Vitalii
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Colunga Biancatelli, Ruben M. L.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_facet Kim, Vitalii
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Colunga Biancatelli, Ruben M. L.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_sort Kim, Vitalii
collection PubMed
description Reversing the pulse polarity, i.e., changing the electric field direction by 180°, inhibits electroporation and electrostimulation by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEPs). This feature, known as “bipolar cancellation,” enables selective remote targeting with nsEPs and reduces the neuromuscular side effects of ablation therapies. We analyzed the biophysical mechanisms and measured how cancellation weakens and is replaced by facilitation when nsEPs are applied from different directions at angles from 0 to 180°. Monolayers of endothelial cells were electroporated by a train of five pulses (600 ns) or five paired pulses (600 + 600 ns) applied at 1 Hz or 833 kHz. Reversing the electric field in the pairs (180° direction change) caused 2-fold (1 Hz) or 20-fold (833 kHz) weaker electroporation than the train of single nsEPs. Reducing the angle between pulse directions in the pairs weakened cancellation and replaced it with facilitation at angles <160° (1 Hz) and <130° (833 kHz). Facilitation plateaued at about three-fold stronger electroporation compared to single pulses at 90–100° angle for both nsEP frequencies. The profound dependence of the efficiency on the angle enables novel protocols for highly selective focal electroporation at one electrode in a three-electrode array while avoiding effects at the other electrodes. Nanosecond-resolution imaging of cell membrane potential was used to link the selectivity to charging kinetics by co- and counter-directional nsEPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10341945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103419452023-07-14 Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction Kim, Vitalii Semenov, Iurii Kiester, Allen S. Keppler, Mark A. Ibey, Bennett L. Bixler, Joel N. Colunga Biancatelli, Ruben M. L. Pakhomov, Andrei G. Int J Mol Sci Article Reversing the pulse polarity, i.e., changing the electric field direction by 180°, inhibits electroporation and electrostimulation by nanosecond electric pulses (nsEPs). This feature, known as “bipolar cancellation,” enables selective remote targeting with nsEPs and reduces the neuromuscular side effects of ablation therapies. We analyzed the biophysical mechanisms and measured how cancellation weakens and is replaced by facilitation when nsEPs are applied from different directions at angles from 0 to 180°. Monolayers of endothelial cells were electroporated by a train of five pulses (600 ns) or five paired pulses (600 + 600 ns) applied at 1 Hz or 833 kHz. Reversing the electric field in the pairs (180° direction change) caused 2-fold (1 Hz) or 20-fold (833 kHz) weaker electroporation than the train of single nsEPs. Reducing the angle between pulse directions in the pairs weakened cancellation and replaced it with facilitation at angles <160° (1 Hz) and <130° (833 kHz). Facilitation plateaued at about three-fold stronger electroporation compared to single pulses at 90–100° angle for both nsEP frequencies. The profound dependence of the efficiency on the angle enables novel protocols for highly selective focal electroporation at one electrode in a three-electrode array while avoiding effects at the other electrodes. Nanosecond-resolution imaging of cell membrane potential was used to link the selectivity to charging kinetics by co- and counter-directional nsEPs. MDPI 2023-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10341945/ /pubmed/37446096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310921 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Vitalii
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Colunga Biancatelli, Ruben M. L.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title_full Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title_fullStr Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title_full_unstemmed Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title_short Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction
title_sort control of the electroporation efficiency of nanosecond pulses by swinging the electric field vector direction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10341945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310921
work_keys_str_mv AT kimvitalii controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT semenoviurii controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT kiesterallens controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT kepplermarka controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT ibeybennettl controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT bixlerjoeln controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT colungabiancatellirubenml controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection
AT pakhomovandreig controloftheelectroporationefficiencyofnanosecondpulsesbyswingingtheelectricfieldvectordirection