Cargando…

Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study

Background: enamel demineralization is a common side effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed braces. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare a conventional adhesive system and a modern adhesive system (APC Flash-Free [FF] technology) with regard to the demineralization of enamel by Str...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig, Löhnert, Simon, Nitzsche, Ann, Nietzsche, Sandor, Steiniger, Frank, Marquetand, Justus, Tolksdorf, Konrad, Guellmar, André, Sigusch, Bernd, Jacobs, Collin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134494
_version_ 1785072539681161216
author Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig
Löhnert, Simon
Nitzsche, Ann
Nietzsche, Sandor
Steiniger, Frank
Marquetand, Justus
Tolksdorf, Konrad
Guellmar, André
Sigusch, Bernd
Jacobs, Collin
author_facet Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig
Löhnert, Simon
Nitzsche, Ann
Nietzsche, Sandor
Steiniger, Frank
Marquetand, Justus
Tolksdorf, Konrad
Guellmar, André
Sigusch, Bernd
Jacobs, Collin
author_sort Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig
collection PubMed
description Background: enamel demineralization is a common side effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed braces. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare a conventional adhesive system and a modern adhesive system (APC Flash-Free [FF] technology) with regard to the demineralization of enamel by Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus). Methods: this in vitro study included premolar teeth and compared APC FF adhesive brackets (Group A, n = 15) with conventional adhesive brackets (Group B, n = 15) from the same company. Specimens were incubated with a positive control group (PCG, n = 5) and a negative control group (NCG, n = 5) in an S. sobrinus suspension for three weeks. To evaluate the grade of enamel demineralization, the samples were analyzed using a polarizing microscope. Results: the test specimens of group B with conventionally bonded bracket adhesive showed significantly greater (+10.8 μm) demineralization with regard to the penetration depth of the demineralization than the PCG (p = 0.012). Thus, there was a difference from group A with the new bracket adhesive of the FF brackets (+7.29 μm). Significantly, demineralization was more pronounced cervically than coronally in both groups, and it occurred cervically more frequently than grade 3 demineralization (p = 0.001). Conclusions: it seems plausible that new orthodontic bracket adhesives and the modern FF adhesive system positively contribute to the reduction in enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10342608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103426082023-07-14 Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig Löhnert, Simon Nitzsche, Ann Nietzsche, Sandor Steiniger, Frank Marquetand, Justus Tolksdorf, Konrad Guellmar, André Sigusch, Bernd Jacobs, Collin J Clin Med Article Background: enamel demineralization is a common side effect of orthodontic therapy with fixed braces. The aim of the present in vitro study was to compare a conventional adhesive system and a modern adhesive system (APC Flash-Free [FF] technology) with regard to the demineralization of enamel by Streptococcus sobrinus (S. sobrinus). Methods: this in vitro study included premolar teeth and compared APC FF adhesive brackets (Group A, n = 15) with conventional adhesive brackets (Group B, n = 15) from the same company. Specimens were incubated with a positive control group (PCG, n = 5) and a negative control group (NCG, n = 5) in an S. sobrinus suspension for three weeks. To evaluate the grade of enamel demineralization, the samples were analyzed using a polarizing microscope. Results: the test specimens of group B with conventionally bonded bracket adhesive showed significantly greater (+10.8 μm) demineralization with regard to the penetration depth of the demineralization than the PCG (p = 0.012). Thus, there was a difference from group A with the new bracket adhesive of the FF brackets (+7.29 μm). Significantly, demineralization was more pronounced cervically than coronally in both groups, and it occurred cervically more frequently than grade 3 demineralization (p = 0.001). Conclusions: it seems plausible that new orthodontic bracket adhesives and the modern FF adhesive system positively contribute to the reduction in enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. MDPI 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10342608/ /pubmed/37445529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134494 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hennig, Christoph-Ludwig
Löhnert, Simon
Nitzsche, Ann
Nietzsche, Sandor
Steiniger, Frank
Marquetand, Justus
Tolksdorf, Konrad
Guellmar, André
Sigusch, Bernd
Jacobs, Collin
Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title_full Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title_short Influence of Different Bracket Adhesive Systems on Enamel Demineralization—An In Vitro Study
title_sort influence of different bracket adhesive systems on enamel demineralization—an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134494
work_keys_str_mv AT hennigchristophludwig influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT lohnertsimon influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT nitzscheann influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT nietzschesandor influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT steinigerfrank influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT marquetandjustus influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT tolksdorfkonrad influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT guellmarandre influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT siguschbernd influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy
AT jacobscollin influenceofdifferentbracketadhesivesystemsonenameldemineralizationaninvitrostudy