Cargando…
Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study
The aim of this study is to present a personalized predictive model (PPM) with a machine learning (ML) system that is able to identify and classify patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) following mpMRI. We extracted all the patients who underwent fusion biopsy (FB) from March 2014 to Decembe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134358 |
_version_ | 1785072576824868864 |
---|---|
author | Checcucci, Enrico Rosati, Samanta De Cillis, Sabrina Giordano, Noemi Volpi, Gabriele Granato, Stefano Zamengo, Davide Verri, Paolo Amparore, Daniele De Luca, Stefano Manfredi, Matteo Fiori, Cristian Di Dio, Michele Balestra, Gabriella Porpiglia, Francesco |
author_facet | Checcucci, Enrico Rosati, Samanta De Cillis, Sabrina Giordano, Noemi Volpi, Gabriele Granato, Stefano Zamengo, Davide Verri, Paolo Amparore, Daniele De Luca, Stefano Manfredi, Matteo Fiori, Cristian Di Dio, Michele Balestra, Gabriella Porpiglia, Francesco |
author_sort | Checcucci, Enrico |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to present a personalized predictive model (PPM) with a machine learning (ML) system that is able to identify and classify patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) following mpMRI. We extracted all the patients who underwent fusion biopsy (FB) from March 2014 to December 2019, while patients from August 2020 to April 2021 were included as a validation set. The proposed system was based on the following four ML methods: a fuzzy inference system (FIS), the support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and self-organizing maps (SOMs). Then, a system based on fuzzy logic (FL) + SVM was compared with logistic regression (LR) and standard diagnostic tools. A total of 1448 patients were included in the training set, while 181 patients were included in the validation set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the proposed FIS + SVM model was comparable with the LR model but outperformed the other diagnostic tools. The FIS + SVM model demonstrated the best performance, in terms of negative predictive value (NPV), on the training set (78.5%); moreover, it outperformed the LR in terms of specificity (92.1% vs. 83%). Considering the validation set, our model outperformed the other methods in terms of NPV (60.7%), sensitivity (90.8%), and accuracy (69.1%). In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated a PPM tool using the FIS + SVM model to calculate the probability of PCa prior to a prostate FB, avoiding useless ones in 15% of the cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10342762 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103427622023-07-14 Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study Checcucci, Enrico Rosati, Samanta De Cillis, Sabrina Giordano, Noemi Volpi, Gabriele Granato, Stefano Zamengo, Davide Verri, Paolo Amparore, Daniele De Luca, Stefano Manfredi, Matteo Fiori, Cristian Di Dio, Michele Balestra, Gabriella Porpiglia, Francesco J Clin Med Article The aim of this study is to present a personalized predictive model (PPM) with a machine learning (ML) system that is able to identify and classify patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) following mpMRI. We extracted all the patients who underwent fusion biopsy (FB) from March 2014 to December 2019, while patients from August 2020 to April 2021 were included as a validation set. The proposed system was based on the following four ML methods: a fuzzy inference system (FIS), the support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and self-organizing maps (SOMs). Then, a system based on fuzzy logic (FL) + SVM was compared with logistic regression (LR) and standard diagnostic tools. A total of 1448 patients were included in the training set, while 181 patients were included in the validation set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the proposed FIS + SVM model was comparable with the LR model but outperformed the other diagnostic tools. The FIS + SVM model demonstrated the best performance, in terms of negative predictive value (NPV), on the training set (78.5%); moreover, it outperformed the LR in terms of specificity (92.1% vs. 83%). Considering the validation set, our model outperformed the other methods in terms of NPV (60.7%), sensitivity (90.8%), and accuracy (69.1%). In conclusion, we successfully developed and validated a PPM tool using the FIS + SVM model to calculate the probability of PCa prior to a prostate FB, avoiding useless ones in 15% of the cases. MDPI 2023-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10342762/ /pubmed/37445393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134358 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Checcucci, Enrico Rosati, Samanta De Cillis, Sabrina Giordano, Noemi Volpi, Gabriele Granato, Stefano Zamengo, Davide Verri, Paolo Amparore, Daniele De Luca, Stefano Manfredi, Matteo Fiori, Cristian Di Dio, Michele Balestra, Gabriella Porpiglia, Francesco Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title | Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title_full | Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title_fullStr | Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title_short | Machine-Learning-Based Tool to Predict Target Prostate Biopsy Outcomes: An Internal Validation Study |
title_sort | machine-learning-based tool to predict target prostate biopsy outcomes: an internal validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT checcuccienrico machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT rosatisamanta machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT decillissabrina machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT giordanonoemi machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT volpigabriele machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT granatostefano machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT zamengodavide machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT verripaolo machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT amparoredaniele machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT delucastefano machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT manfredimatteo machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT fioricristian machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT didiomichele machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT balestragabriella machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy AT porpigliafrancesco machinelearningbasedtooltopredicttargetprostatebiopsyoutcomesaninternalvalidationstudy |