Cargando…

Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background: Allograft urolithiasis is an uncommon, challenging, and potentially dangerous clinical problem. Treatment of allograft stones includes external shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (fURSL), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A gap in the literature and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerrato, Clara, Jahrreiss, Victoria, Nedbal, Carlotta, Ripa, Francesco, De Marco, Vincenzo, Monga, Manoj, Pietropaolo, Amelia, Somani, Bhaskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134389
_version_ 1785072577060798464
author Cerrato, Clara
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Nedbal, Carlotta
Ripa, Francesco
De Marco, Vincenzo
Monga, Manoj
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Somani, Bhaskar
author_facet Cerrato, Clara
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Nedbal, Carlotta
Ripa, Francesco
De Marco, Vincenzo
Monga, Manoj
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Somani, Bhaskar
author_sort Cerrato, Clara
collection PubMed
description Background: Allograft urolithiasis is an uncommon, challenging, and potentially dangerous clinical problem. Treatment of allograft stones includes external shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (fURSL), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A gap in the literature and guidelines exists regarding the treatment of patients in this setting. The aim of this systematic review was to collect preoperative and treatment characteristics and evaluate the outcomes of post-transplant SWL for stone disease. Methods: A systematic search in the literature was performed, including articles up to March 2023. Only original English articles were selected. Results: Eight articles (81 patients) were included in the review. Patients were mainly male, with a mean age of 41.9 years (±7.07). The mean stone size was 13.18 mm (±2.28 mm). Stones were predominantly located in the kidney (n = 18, 62%). The overall stone-free rate and complication rates were 81% (range: 50–100%) and 17.2% (14/81), respectively, with only one major complication reported. A pre-operative drainage was placed in eleven (13.5%) patients. Five patients (6.71%) required a second treatment for residual fragments. Conclusions: SWL is a safe and effective option to treat de novo stones after transplantation. Larger studies are needed to better address allograft urolithiasis management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10342763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103427632023-07-14 Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature Cerrato, Clara Jahrreiss, Victoria Nedbal, Carlotta Ripa, Francesco De Marco, Vincenzo Monga, Manoj Pietropaolo, Amelia Somani, Bhaskar J Clin Med Review Background: Allograft urolithiasis is an uncommon, challenging, and potentially dangerous clinical problem. Treatment of allograft stones includes external shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), flexible ureteroscopy and lasertripsy (fURSL), or percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A gap in the literature and guidelines exists regarding the treatment of patients in this setting. The aim of this systematic review was to collect preoperative and treatment characteristics and evaluate the outcomes of post-transplant SWL for stone disease. Methods: A systematic search in the literature was performed, including articles up to March 2023. Only original English articles were selected. Results: Eight articles (81 patients) were included in the review. Patients were mainly male, with a mean age of 41.9 years (±7.07). The mean stone size was 13.18 mm (±2.28 mm). Stones were predominantly located in the kidney (n = 18, 62%). The overall stone-free rate and complication rates were 81% (range: 50–100%) and 17.2% (14/81), respectively, with only one major complication reported. A pre-operative drainage was placed in eleven (13.5%) patients. Five patients (6.71%) required a second treatment for residual fragments. Conclusions: SWL is a safe and effective option to treat de novo stones after transplantation. Larger studies are needed to better address allograft urolithiasis management. MDPI 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10342763/ /pubmed/37445423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134389 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cerrato, Clara
Jahrreiss, Victoria
Nedbal, Carlotta
Ripa, Francesco
De Marco, Vincenzo
Monga, Manoj
Pietropaolo, Amelia
Somani, Bhaskar
Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Shockwave Lithotripsy for De-Novo Urolithiasis after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort shockwave lithotripsy for de-novo urolithiasis after kidney transplantation: a systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445423
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134389
work_keys_str_mv AT cerratoclara shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT jahrreissvictoria shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT nedbalcarlotta shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ripafrancesco shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT demarcovincenzo shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT mongamanoj shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT pietropaoloamelia shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT somanibhaskar shockwavelithotripsyfordenovourolithiasisafterkidneytransplantationasystematicreviewoftheliterature