Cargando…
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters
Determination of the Bishop score (BS) is a traditional method of assessing the cervix in obstetrics and gynecology. This examination is characterized by subjectivity of assessment and low repeatability. In scientific studies intended to evaluate the results of the procedure based on the initial ass...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134492 |
_version_ | 1785072595146637312 |
---|---|
author | Mlodawski, Jakub Mlodawska, Marta Plusajska, Justyna Detka, Karolina Bialek, Katarzyna Swiercz, Grzegorz |
author_facet | Mlodawski, Jakub Mlodawska, Marta Plusajska, Justyna Detka, Karolina Bialek, Katarzyna Swiercz, Grzegorz |
author_sort | Mlodawski, Jakub |
collection | PubMed |
description | Determination of the Bishop score (BS) is a traditional method of assessing the cervix in obstetrics and gynecology. This examination is characterized by subjectivity of assessment and low repeatability. In scientific studies intended to evaluate the results of the procedure based on the initial assessment, it is necessary to find an objective scale based on ultrasonography. We selected five ultrasound parameters, measured with a transvaginal transducer, that are equivalent to the individual BS axes (dilatation assessed in three-dimensional ultrasound (DL), angle of progression (AoP), vagino-cervical angle (VCA), strain elastography using the E-Cervix module, and cervical length (CL)). All selected parameters were characterized by good to excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.878–0.994) and reproducibility (ICC = 0.826–0.996). Each of the selected parameters significantly correlated with its corresponding BS axis. The highest value of the correlation coefficient was achieved with CL (−0.75) and DL (0.71). Other parameters were characterized by an average to high correlation (AoP and station = 0.69, hardness ratio and consistency = −0.33, position and VCA = −0.38). The best correlation with the sum of the BS points was exhibited by AoP (0.52) and CL (−0.61). The selected ultrasound parameters analogous to the BS axes were characterized by high repeatability and significant correlation with the axes of the original clinical BS. Further research into the predictive properties of a multivariate model based on these parameters is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10342838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103428382023-07-14 Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters Mlodawski, Jakub Mlodawska, Marta Plusajska, Justyna Detka, Karolina Bialek, Katarzyna Swiercz, Grzegorz J Clin Med Article Determination of the Bishop score (BS) is a traditional method of assessing the cervix in obstetrics and gynecology. This examination is characterized by subjectivity of assessment and low repeatability. In scientific studies intended to evaluate the results of the procedure based on the initial assessment, it is necessary to find an objective scale based on ultrasonography. We selected five ultrasound parameters, measured with a transvaginal transducer, that are equivalent to the individual BS axes (dilatation assessed in three-dimensional ultrasound (DL), angle of progression (AoP), vagino-cervical angle (VCA), strain elastography using the E-Cervix module, and cervical length (CL)). All selected parameters were characterized by good to excellent repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.878–0.994) and reproducibility (ICC = 0.826–0.996). Each of the selected parameters significantly correlated with its corresponding BS axis. The highest value of the correlation coefficient was achieved with CL (−0.75) and DL (0.71). Other parameters were characterized by an average to high correlation (AoP and station = 0.69, hardness ratio and consistency = −0.33, position and VCA = −0.38). The best correlation with the sum of the BS points was exhibited by AoP (0.52) and CL (−0.61). The selected ultrasound parameters analogous to the BS axes were characterized by high repeatability and significant correlation with the axes of the original clinical BS. Further research into the predictive properties of a multivariate model based on these parameters is needed. MDPI 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10342838/ /pubmed/37445532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134492 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mlodawski, Jakub Mlodawska, Marta Plusajska, Justyna Detka, Karolina Bialek, Katarzyna Swiercz, Grzegorz Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title_full | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title_fullStr | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title_short | Repeatability and Reproducibility of Potential Ultrasonographic Bishop Score Parameters |
title_sort | repeatability and reproducibility of potential ultrasonographic bishop score parameters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134492 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mlodawskijakub repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters AT mlodawskamarta repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters AT plusajskajustyna repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters AT detkakarolina repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters AT bialekkatarzyna repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters AT swierczgrzegorz repeatabilityandreproducibilityofpotentialultrasonographicbishopscoreparameters |