Cargando…

Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings

Typically, coniferous sawdust from debarked stems is used to make pellets. Given the high lignin content, which ensures strong binding and high calorific values, this feedstock provides the best quality available. However, finding alternative feedstocks for pellet production is crucial if small-scal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Picchio, Rodolfo, Di Marzio, Nicolò, Cozzolino, Luca, Venanzi, Rachele, Stefanoni, Walter, Bianchini, Leonardo, Pari, Luigi, Latterini, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16134689
_version_ 1785072613073092608
author Picchio, Rodolfo
Di Marzio, Nicolò
Cozzolino, Luca
Venanzi, Rachele
Stefanoni, Walter
Bianchini, Leonardo
Pari, Luigi
Latterini, Francesco
author_facet Picchio, Rodolfo
Di Marzio, Nicolò
Cozzolino, Luca
Venanzi, Rachele
Stefanoni, Walter
Bianchini, Leonardo
Pari, Luigi
Latterini, Francesco
author_sort Picchio, Rodolfo
collection PubMed
description Typically, coniferous sawdust from debarked stems is used to make pellets. Given the high lignin content, which ensures strong binding and high calorific values, this feedstock provides the best quality available. However, finding alternative feedstocks for pellet production is crucial if small-scale pellet production is to be developed and used to support the economy and energy independence of rural communities. These communities have to be able to create pellets devoid of additives and without biomass pre-processing so that the feedstock price remains low. The features of pellets made from other sources of forest biomass, such as different types of waste, broadleaf species, and pruning biomass, have attracted some attention in this context. This review sought to provide an overview of the most recent (2019–2023) knowledge on the subject and to bring into consideration potential feedstocks for the growth of small-scale pellet production. Findings from the literature show that poor bulk density and mechanical durability are the most frequent issues when making pellets from different feedstocks. All of the tested alternative biomass typologies have these shortcomings, which are also a result of the use of low-performance pelletizers in small-scale production, preventing the achievement of adequate mechanical qualities. Pellets made from pruning biomass, coniferous residues, and wood from short-rotation coppice plants all have significant flaws in terms of ash content and, in some cases, nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine content as well. All things considered, research suggests that broadleaf wood from beech and oak trees, collected through routine forest management activities, makes the best feasible feedstock for small-scale pellet production. Despite having poor mechanical qualities, these feedstocks can provide pellets with a low ash level. High ash content is a significant disadvantage when considering pellet manufacture and use on a small scale since it can significantly raise maintenance costs, compromising the supply chain’s ability to operate cost-effectively. Pellets with low bulk density and low mechanical durability can be successfully used in a small-scale supply chain with the advantages of reducing travel distance from the production site and storage time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10342915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103429152023-07-14 Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings Picchio, Rodolfo Di Marzio, Nicolò Cozzolino, Luca Venanzi, Rachele Stefanoni, Walter Bianchini, Leonardo Pari, Luigi Latterini, Francesco Materials (Basel) Review Typically, coniferous sawdust from debarked stems is used to make pellets. Given the high lignin content, which ensures strong binding and high calorific values, this feedstock provides the best quality available. However, finding alternative feedstocks for pellet production is crucial if small-scale pellet production is to be developed and used to support the economy and energy independence of rural communities. These communities have to be able to create pellets devoid of additives and without biomass pre-processing so that the feedstock price remains low. The features of pellets made from other sources of forest biomass, such as different types of waste, broadleaf species, and pruning biomass, have attracted some attention in this context. This review sought to provide an overview of the most recent (2019–2023) knowledge on the subject and to bring into consideration potential feedstocks for the growth of small-scale pellet production. Findings from the literature show that poor bulk density and mechanical durability are the most frequent issues when making pellets from different feedstocks. All of the tested alternative biomass typologies have these shortcomings, which are also a result of the use of low-performance pelletizers in small-scale production, preventing the achievement of adequate mechanical qualities. Pellets made from pruning biomass, coniferous residues, and wood from short-rotation coppice plants all have significant flaws in terms of ash content and, in some cases, nitrogen, sulfur, and chlorine content as well. All things considered, research suggests that broadleaf wood from beech and oak trees, collected through routine forest management activities, makes the best feasible feedstock for small-scale pellet production. Despite having poor mechanical qualities, these feedstocks can provide pellets with a low ash level. High ash content is a significant disadvantage when considering pellet manufacture and use on a small scale since it can significantly raise maintenance costs, compromising the supply chain’s ability to operate cost-effectively. Pellets with low bulk density and low mechanical durability can be successfully used in a small-scale supply chain with the advantages of reducing travel distance from the production site and storage time. MDPI 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10342915/ /pubmed/37445003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16134689 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Picchio, Rodolfo
Di Marzio, Nicolò
Cozzolino, Luca
Venanzi, Rachele
Stefanoni, Walter
Bianchini, Leonardo
Pari, Luigi
Latterini, Francesco
Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title_full Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title_fullStr Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title_full_unstemmed Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title_short Pellet Production from Pruning and Alternative Forest Biomass: A Review of the Most Recent Research Findings
title_sort pellet production from pruning and alternative forest biomass: a review of the most recent research findings
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445003
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16134689
work_keys_str_mv AT picchiorodolfo pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT dimarzionicolo pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT cozzolinoluca pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT venanzirachele pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT stefanoniwalter pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT bianchinileonardo pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT pariluigi pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings
AT latterinifrancesco pelletproductionfrompruningandalternativeforestbiomassareviewofthemostrecentresearchfindings