Cargando…
Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866 |
_version_ | 1785072643487039488 |
---|---|
author | Andò, Agata Garbarini, Francesca Giromini, Luciano Salatino, Adriana Zennaro, Alessandro Ricci, Raffaella Fossataro, Carlotta |
author_facet | Andò, Agata Garbarini, Francesca Giromini, Luciano Salatino, Adriana Zennaro, Alessandro Ricci, Raffaella Fossataro, Carlotta |
author_sort | Andò, Agata |
collection | PubMed |
description | It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M responses could affect the excitability of the motor cortex by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1). We hypothesized that Rorschach inkblot stimuli triggering the viewer’s experience of human movement would increase corticospinal excitability. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (15 women) participated in the preliminary experiment, while another different sample of twenty-two healthy participants (11 women) ranging in age from 21 to 41 years was enrolled in the main experiment. Our results showed that the Rorschach cards known to be associated with a high number of M responses elicited human movement both as automatic internal sensations and as verbal production of responses involving human movement. However, contrary to our hypothesis, the reported internal feeling of human movement had no corresponding physiological counterpart, as the amplitude of MEPs did not increase. Possible and innovative explanations for the involvement of bottom-up and top-down processes were provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10343040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103430402023-07-14 Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? Andò, Agata Garbarini, Francesca Giromini, Luciano Salatino, Adriana Zennaro, Alessandro Ricci, Raffaella Fossataro, Carlotta PLoS One Research Article It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M responses could affect the excitability of the motor cortex by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1). We hypothesized that Rorschach inkblot stimuli triggering the viewer’s experience of human movement would increase corticospinal excitability. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (15 women) participated in the preliminary experiment, while another different sample of twenty-two healthy participants (11 women) ranging in age from 21 to 41 years was enrolled in the main experiment. Our results showed that the Rorschach cards known to be associated with a high number of M responses elicited human movement both as automatic internal sensations and as verbal production of responses involving human movement. However, contrary to our hypothesis, the reported internal feeling of human movement had no corresponding physiological counterpart, as the amplitude of MEPs did not increase. Possible and innovative explanations for the involvement of bottom-up and top-down processes were provided. Public Library of Science 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10343040/ /pubmed/37440495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866 Text en © 2023 Andò et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Andò, Agata Garbarini, Francesca Giromini, Luciano Salatino, Adriana Zennaro, Alessandro Ricci, Raffaella Fossataro, Carlotta Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title | Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title_full | Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title_fullStr | Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title_short | Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
title_sort | can static rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andoagata canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT garbarinifrancesca canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT girominiluciano canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT salatinoadriana canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT zennaroalessandro canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT ricciraffaella canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability AT fossatarocarlotta canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability |