Cargando…

Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?

It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andò, Agata, Garbarini, Francesca, Giromini, Luciano, Salatino, Adriana, Zennaro, Alessandro, Ricci, Raffaella, Fossataro, Carlotta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866
_version_ 1785072643487039488
author Andò, Agata
Garbarini, Francesca
Giromini, Luciano
Salatino, Adriana
Zennaro, Alessandro
Ricci, Raffaella
Fossataro, Carlotta
author_facet Andò, Agata
Garbarini, Francesca
Giromini, Luciano
Salatino, Adriana
Zennaro, Alessandro
Ricci, Raffaella
Fossataro, Carlotta
author_sort Andò, Agata
collection PubMed
description It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M responses could affect the excitability of the motor cortex by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1). We hypothesized that Rorschach inkblot stimuli triggering the viewer’s experience of human movement would increase corticospinal excitability. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (15 women) participated in the preliminary experiment, while another different sample of twenty-two healthy participants (11 women) ranging in age from 21 to 41 years was enrolled in the main experiment. Our results showed that the Rorschach cards known to be associated with a high number of M responses elicited human movement both as automatic internal sensations and as verbal production of responses involving human movement. However, contrary to our hypothesis, the reported internal feeling of human movement had no corresponding physiological counterpart, as the amplitude of MEPs did not increase. Possible and innovative explanations for the involvement of bottom-up and top-down processes were provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10343040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103430402023-07-14 Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability? Andò, Agata Garbarini, Francesca Giromini, Luciano Salatino, Adriana Zennaro, Alessandro Ricci, Raffaella Fossataro, Carlotta PLoS One Research Article It has been proposed that seeing human movement or activity (M), while trying to say what the static Rorschach inkblot design look like, is accompanied by Mirror Neuron System (MNS)-like mirroring activity in the brain. The present study aimed to investigate whether the Rorschach cards eliciting M responses could affect the excitability of the motor cortex by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS over the primary motor cortex (M1). We hypothesized that Rorschach inkblot stimuli triggering the viewer’s experience of human movement would increase corticospinal excitability. Twenty-one healthy volunteers (15 women) participated in the preliminary experiment, while another different sample of twenty-two healthy participants (11 women) ranging in age from 21 to 41 years was enrolled in the main experiment. Our results showed that the Rorschach cards known to be associated with a high number of M responses elicited human movement both as automatic internal sensations and as verbal production of responses involving human movement. However, contrary to our hypothesis, the reported internal feeling of human movement had no corresponding physiological counterpart, as the amplitude of MEPs did not increase. Possible and innovative explanations for the involvement of bottom-up and top-down processes were provided. Public Library of Science 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10343040/ /pubmed/37440495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866 Text en © 2023 Andò et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Andò, Agata
Garbarini, Francesca
Giromini, Luciano
Salatino, Adriana
Zennaro, Alessandro
Ricci, Raffaella
Fossataro, Carlotta
Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title_full Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title_fullStr Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title_full_unstemmed Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title_short Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
title_sort can static rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287866
work_keys_str_mv AT andoagata canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT garbarinifrancesca canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT girominiluciano canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT salatinoadriana canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT zennaroalessandro canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT ricciraffaella canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability
AT fossatarocarlotta canstaticrorschachstimuliperceivedasinmotionaffectcorticospinalexcitability