Cargando…
Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431 |
_version_ | 1785072654791737344 |
---|---|
author | Opfermann, Philipp Schmid, Werner Obradovic, Mina Kraft, Felix Zadrazil, Markus Marhofer, Daniela Marhofer, Peter |
author_facet | Opfermann, Philipp Schmid, Werner Obradovic, Mina Kraft, Felix Zadrazil, Markus Marhofer, Daniela Marhofer, Peter |
author_sort | Opfermann, Philipp |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually validated data of a cohort of children aged between 0–15 years was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. We included pediatric surgeries involving a primary plan of caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation (without airway instrumentation) and a contingency plan of general anesthesia. Sex-specific rates were analyzed for overall failure of the primary anesthesia plan, for residual pain, for block-related technical complications and for critical respiratory events. We used Fisher´s exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate sex-specific associations. RESULTS: Data from 487 girls and 2060 boys ≤15 years old (ASA status 1 to 4) were analyzed. The primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI 3.8%-7.8%) (N = 27/487) among girls and 4.7% (95%CI 3.9%-5.7%) (N = 97/2060) among boys (p = 0.41). Residual pain was the main cause of failure, with rates of 4.5% (95%CI 2.9–6.6%) (N = 22/487) among girls and 3.0% (95%CI 2.3–3.8%) (N = 61/2060) among boys (p = 0.089). Block-related technical complications were seen at rates of 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.5–2.7%) (N = 51/2060) among boys and, hence, significantly more often among male patients (p = 0.023). Male sex was significantly associated with higher odds (adjusted OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.12–9; p = 0.029) for such technical complications regardless of age, ASA status, gestational week at birth or puncture attempts. Critical respiratory events occurred at a 1.7% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%) rate (N = 35/2060) twice as high among boys as 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: While the the primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was equal for girls and boys, technical complications and respiratory events are more likely to occur in boys. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10343088 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103430882023-07-14 Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation Opfermann, Philipp Schmid, Werner Obradovic, Mina Kraft, Felix Zadrazil, Markus Marhofer, Daniela Marhofer, Peter PLoS One Research Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually validated data of a cohort of children aged between 0–15 years was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. We included pediatric surgeries involving a primary plan of caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation (without airway instrumentation) and a contingency plan of general anesthesia. Sex-specific rates were analyzed for overall failure of the primary anesthesia plan, for residual pain, for block-related technical complications and for critical respiratory events. We used Fisher´s exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate sex-specific associations. RESULTS: Data from 487 girls and 2060 boys ≤15 years old (ASA status 1 to 4) were analyzed. The primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI 3.8%-7.8%) (N = 27/487) among girls and 4.7% (95%CI 3.9%-5.7%) (N = 97/2060) among boys (p = 0.41). Residual pain was the main cause of failure, with rates of 4.5% (95%CI 2.9–6.6%) (N = 22/487) among girls and 3.0% (95%CI 2.3–3.8%) (N = 61/2060) among boys (p = 0.089). Block-related technical complications were seen at rates of 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.5–2.7%) (N = 51/2060) among boys and, hence, significantly more often among male patients (p = 0.023). Male sex was significantly associated with higher odds (adjusted OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.12–9; p = 0.029) for such technical complications regardless of age, ASA status, gestational week at birth or puncture attempts. Critical respiratory events occurred at a 1.7% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%) rate (N = 35/2060) twice as high among boys as 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: While the the primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was equal for girls and boys, technical complications and respiratory events are more likely to occur in boys. Public Library of Science 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10343088/ /pubmed/37440538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431 Text en © 2023 Opfermann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Opfermann, Philipp Schmid, Werner Obradovic, Mina Kraft, Felix Zadrazil, Markus Marhofer, Daniela Marhofer, Peter Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title | Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title_full | Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title_short | Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
title_sort | sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343088/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opfermannphilipp sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT schmidwerner sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT obradovicmina sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT kraftfelix sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT zadrazilmarkus sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT marhoferdaniela sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation AT marhoferpeter sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation |