Cargando…

Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opfermann, Philipp, Schmid, Werner, Obradovic, Mina, Kraft, Felix, Zadrazil, Markus, Marhofer, Daniela, Marhofer, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431
_version_ 1785072654791737344
author Opfermann, Philipp
Schmid, Werner
Obradovic, Mina
Kraft, Felix
Zadrazil, Markus
Marhofer, Daniela
Marhofer, Peter
author_facet Opfermann, Philipp
Schmid, Werner
Obradovic, Mina
Kraft, Felix
Zadrazil, Markus
Marhofer, Daniela
Marhofer, Peter
author_sort Opfermann, Philipp
collection PubMed
description STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually validated data of a cohort of children aged between 0–15 years was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. We included pediatric surgeries involving a primary plan of caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation (without airway instrumentation) and a contingency plan of general anesthesia. Sex-specific rates were analyzed for overall failure of the primary anesthesia plan, for residual pain, for block-related technical complications and for critical respiratory events. We used Fisher´s exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate sex-specific associations. RESULTS: Data from 487 girls and 2060 boys ≤15 years old (ASA status 1 to 4) were analyzed. The primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI 3.8%-7.8%) (N = 27/487) among girls and 4.7% (95%CI 3.9%-5.7%) (N = 97/2060) among boys (p = 0.41). Residual pain was the main cause of failure, with rates of 4.5% (95%CI 2.9–6.6%) (N = 22/487) among girls and 3.0% (95%CI 2.3–3.8%) (N = 61/2060) among boys (p = 0.089). Block-related technical complications were seen at rates of 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.5–2.7%) (N = 51/2060) among boys and, hence, significantly more often among male patients (p = 0.023). Male sex was significantly associated with higher odds (adjusted OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.12–9; p = 0.029) for such technical complications regardless of age, ASA status, gestational week at birth or puncture attempts. Critical respiratory events occurred at a 1.7% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%) rate (N = 35/2060) twice as high among boys as 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: While the the primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was equal for girls and boys, technical complications and respiratory events are more likely to occur in boys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10343088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103430882023-07-14 Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation Opfermann, Philipp Schmid, Werner Obradovic, Mina Kraft, Felix Zadrazil, Markus Marhofer, Daniela Marhofer, Peter PLoS One Research Article STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences associated with caudal epidurals, the most commonly used technique of pediatric regional anesthesia, based on individually validated data of ultrasound-guided blocks performed between 04/2014 and 12/2020. METHODS: Prospectively collected and individually validated data of a cohort of children aged between 0–15 years was analyzed in a retrospective observational study. We included pediatric surgeries involving a primary plan of caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation (without airway instrumentation) and a contingency plan of general anesthesia. Sex-specific rates were analyzed for overall failure of the primary anesthesia plan, for residual pain, for block-related technical complications and for critical respiratory events. We used Fisher´s exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were used to evaluate sex-specific associations. RESULTS: Data from 487 girls and 2060 boys ≤15 years old (ASA status 1 to 4) were analyzed. The primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was 5.5% (95%CI 3.8%-7.8%) (N = 27/487) among girls and 4.7% (95%CI 3.9%-5.7%) (N = 97/2060) among boys (p = 0.41). Residual pain was the main cause of failure, with rates of 4.5% (95%CI 2.9–6.6%) (N = 22/487) among girls and 3.0% (95%CI 2.3–3.8%) (N = 61/2060) among boys (p = 0.089). Block-related technical complications were seen at rates of 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls vs 2.5% (95%CI 0.5–2.7%) (N = 51/2060) among boys and, hence, significantly more often among male patients (p = 0.023). Male sex was significantly associated with higher odds (adjusted OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.12–9; p = 0.029) for such technical complications regardless of age, ASA status, gestational week at birth or puncture attempts. Critical respiratory events occurred at a 1.7% (95%CI 1.2%-2.3%) rate (N = 35/2060) twice as high among boys as 0.8% (95%CI 0.3%-1.9%) (N = 4/487) among girls (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: While the the primary-anesthesia-plan failure rate was equal for girls and boys, technical complications and respiratory events are more likely to occur in boys. Public Library of Science 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10343088/ /pubmed/37440538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431 Text en © 2023 Opfermann et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Opfermann, Philipp
Schmid, Werner
Obradovic, Mina
Kraft, Felix
Zadrazil, Markus
Marhofer, Daniela
Marhofer, Peter
Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title_full Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title_fullStr Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title_short Sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
title_sort sex differences in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia under sedation without primary airway instrumentation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37440538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288431
work_keys_str_mv AT opfermannphilipp sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT schmidwerner sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT obradovicmina sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT kraftfelix sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT zadrazilmarkus sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT marhoferdaniela sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation
AT marhoferpeter sexdifferencesinpediatriccaudalepiduralanesthesiaundersedationwithoutprimaryairwayinstrumentation