Cargando…

Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations

Contraceptive tablets typically contain a combination of two synthetic versions of an estrogen and a progestogen, which work together to inhibit the ovulation process. An accurate and precise quantification of these components is essential for contraceptive producers. In this study, we have develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peña, Javier, González-Mariño, Iria, Pavón, José L. Pérez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134978
_version_ 1785072679048445952
author Peña, Javier
González-Mariño, Iria
Pavón, José L. Pérez
author_facet Peña, Javier
González-Mariño, Iria
Pavón, José L. Pérez
author_sort Peña, Javier
collection PubMed
description Contraceptive tablets typically contain a combination of two synthetic versions of an estrogen and a progestogen, which work together to inhibit the ovulation process. An accurate and precise quantification of these components is essential for contraceptive producers. In this study, we have developed the first gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DP) in contraceptive formulations. Under the final working conditions, analytes were extracted from the solid by ultrasound-assisted extraction (15 min) in methanol. The resulting suspension was diluted in ethyl acetate, subjected to centrifugation and, finally, the supernatant was directly injected into the GC–MS system. No derivatization reagents were utilized. To correct for instrumental variations, calibration was performed using the internal standard method, with cholesterol as the internal standard. A good linearity was achieved throughout the calibration range for both EE (3–12 µg mL(−1)) and DP (300–1200 µg mL(−1)), with R(2) values exceeding 0.99. Trueness, assessed in terms of percentages of recovery, was also found to be satisfactory for both analytes, with recovery rates of 106 ± 8% for EE and 93 ± 9% for DP. Furthermore, intra-day and inter-day precision studies yielded relative standard deviation values below 6% for both analytes. In terms of sensitivity, the instrumental limits of detection were 0.25 µg mL(−1) for EE and 6.6 µg mL(−1) for DP, and the instrumental limits of quantification 0.82 µg mL(−1) for EE and 22 µg mL(−1) for DP. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of contraceptive tablets from three different pharmaceutical companies. No differences were observed between the measured and the declared amount of active principle per tablet, demonstrating the applicability of the procedure. In addition, a stability study conducted on both the standards and sample extracts demonstrated that they can be stored at room temperature for a minimum period of seven days.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10343192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103431922023-07-14 Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations Peña, Javier González-Mariño, Iria Pavón, José L. Pérez Molecules Article Contraceptive tablets typically contain a combination of two synthetic versions of an estrogen and a progestogen, which work together to inhibit the ovulation process. An accurate and precise quantification of these components is essential for contraceptive producers. In this study, we have developed the first gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of 17α-ethinyl estradiol (EE) and drospirenone (DP) in contraceptive formulations. Under the final working conditions, analytes were extracted from the solid by ultrasound-assisted extraction (15 min) in methanol. The resulting suspension was diluted in ethyl acetate, subjected to centrifugation and, finally, the supernatant was directly injected into the GC–MS system. No derivatization reagents were utilized. To correct for instrumental variations, calibration was performed using the internal standard method, with cholesterol as the internal standard. A good linearity was achieved throughout the calibration range for both EE (3–12 µg mL(−1)) and DP (300–1200 µg mL(−1)), with R(2) values exceeding 0.99. Trueness, assessed in terms of percentages of recovery, was also found to be satisfactory for both analytes, with recovery rates of 106 ± 8% for EE and 93 ± 9% for DP. Furthermore, intra-day and inter-day precision studies yielded relative standard deviation values below 6% for both analytes. In terms of sensitivity, the instrumental limits of detection were 0.25 µg mL(−1) for EE and 6.6 µg mL(−1) for DP, and the instrumental limits of quantification 0.82 µg mL(−1) for EE and 22 µg mL(−1) for DP. The method was successfully applied to the analysis of contraceptive tablets from three different pharmaceutical companies. No differences were observed between the measured and the declared amount of active principle per tablet, demonstrating the applicability of the procedure. In addition, a stability study conducted on both the standards and sample extracts demonstrated that they can be stored at room temperature for a minimum period of seven days. MDPI 2023-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10343192/ /pubmed/37446640 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134978 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peña, Javier
González-Mariño, Iria
Pavón, José L. Pérez
Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title_full Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title_short Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction, Followed by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Simultaneous Quantification of Ethinyl Estradiol and Drospirenone in Contraceptive Formulations
title_sort ultrasound-assisted extraction, followed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for the simultaneous quantification of ethinyl estradiol and drospirenone in contraceptive formulations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37446640
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28134978
work_keys_str_mv AT penajavier ultrasoundassistedextractionfollowedbygaschromatographymassspectrometryforthesimultaneousquantificationofethinylestradiolanddrospirenoneincontraceptiveformulations
AT gonzalezmarinoiria ultrasoundassistedextractionfollowedbygaschromatographymassspectrometryforthesimultaneousquantificationofethinylestradiolanddrospirenoneincontraceptiveformulations
AT pavonjoselperez ultrasoundassistedextractionfollowedbygaschromatographymassspectrometryforthesimultaneousquantificationofethinylestradiolanddrospirenoneincontraceptiveformulations