Cargando…

Clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive restorative in class II cavities: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: This clinical study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite-based bioactive material by comparing it with a resin composite (RC) in the restoration of Class II cavities over a year. METHODOLOGY: A hundred Class II cavities were restored at 31 participants. Groups were as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	OZ, Fatma Dilsad, MERAL, Ece, GURGAN, Sevil
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2023
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10343945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37377309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0025

Ejemplares similares

One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial
por: OZ, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
por: Oz, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Alkasite Restoration in Class I Cavity
por: Rajaraman, G., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sixty-month follow up of three different universal adhesives used with a highly-filled flowable resin composite in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesion
por: Oz, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Development of Newly Formulated Nanoalumina-/Alkasite-Based Restorative Material
por: Abdallah, Reham M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial
por: Sharma, H., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
por: OZ, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Fluoride and Calcium Release from Alkasite and Glass Ionomer Restorative Dental Materials: In Vitro Study
por: Di Lauro, Alessandro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
por: Naz, Fariha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Mechanical Behavior of Alkasite Posterior Restorations in Comparison to Polymeric Materials: A 3D-FEA Study
por: Ausiello, Pietro, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The impact of an alkasite restorative material on the pH of Streptococcus mutans biofilm and dentin remineralization: an in vitro study
por: Wiriyasatiankun, Pawinee, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
por: Aparajitha, R. V., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Shear bond strength evaluation of an alkasite restorative material to three different liners with and without using adhesive system: An in vitro study
por: Mulgaonkar, Aarti, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of an Alkasite Restorative Material and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars: An In vivo Study
por: Pooja, M. P., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness and Wettability of an Alkasite with Nano Bulk-Fill and Nanofilled Resin Composite Restorative Materials: In vitro Study
por: Shekhar, Shrehya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

In Vitro Study on the Adhesive Performance of Some Resin-Based Materials Used to Restore Class II Cavities
por: Ciurea, Andreea, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

56-month clinical performance of Class I and II resin composite restorations
por: PAZINATTO, Flavia Bittencourt, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

In Vitro Comparison of Surface Roughness, Flexural, and Microtensile Strength of Various Glass-Ionomer-Based Materials and a New Alkasite Restorative Material
por: Kaptan, Alper, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Clinical performance of class I cavities restored with bulk fill composite at a 1-year follow-up using the FDI criteria: a randomized clinical trial
por: Suneelkumar, Chinni, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of different gingival margin restorations of class II cavities on microleakage: an in-vitro study
por: Mahrous, Ahmed Ibrahim, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Study on the Restoration of Class II Carious Cavities by Virtual Methods: Simulation of Mechanical Behavior
por: Țuculină, Mihaela Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite
por: Gupta, Nupur, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Operators’ Ease and Satisfaction in Restoring Class II Cavities With Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix System at Qassim University Dental Clinics
por: Almushayti, Mohammed, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Cavities using Packable Composite Restorations with and without use of Liners
por: Arora, Rajesh, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

One-year clinical evaluation of class II bulk-fill restorations in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial
por: Gindri, Larissa D’Olanda, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of the Combination of Restorative Material and the Etching Protocol in Enamel Microleakage in Class II Cavities after Thermocycling
por: Dutra, Natalia Menezes Santana, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Fracture Resistance of Class II MOD Cavities Restored by Direct and Indirect Techniques and Different Materials Combination
por: Tsertsidou, Vasiliki, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Five-Year Clinical Performance of Complex Class II Resin Composite and Amalgam Restorations—A Retrospective Study
por: Santos, Maria Jacinta M. C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of various bleaching treatments on shear bond strength of different universal adhesives and application modes
por: Oz, Fatma Dilsad, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A prospective and randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of ART restorations with high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement versus conventional restorations with resin composite in Class II cavities of permanent teeth: two-year follow-up
por: MENEZES-SILVA, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage in class II cavities restored with Ceram X and Filtek P-90: An in vitro study
por: Bogra, Poonam, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

One-Year Clinical Performance of Activa™ Bioactive-Restorative Composite in Primary Molars
por: Lardani, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of microleakage in Class II cavities restored with silorane-based and methacrylate-based composite resins using different restorative techniques over time
por: Khosravi, Kazem, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Eighteen-month clinical performance of preheated nanoceramic resin-based composites in Class I occlusal cavities: A randomized clinical trial
por: Taufin, Neha, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities—a randomized clinical split-mouth study
por: Cieplik, Fabian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An In Vivo Evaluation of Retention and Antibacterial Efficacy of Posterior High Strength Glass Ionomer Cement and Glass Hybrid Bulk-fill Alkasite Restorative Material as Conservative Adhesive Restoration in Children with Mixed Dentition: A Comparative Study
por: Soneta, Sanjana P, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study
por: Bhatia, Hind P, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations
por: M, Radhika, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Fracture resistance of lab composite versus all-ceramic restorations in class II inlay cavity preparations: An in vitro study
por: Bhanot, Smridhi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Fracture Resistance of Laboratory Composite Versus All-Ceramic Restorations in Class II Inlay Cavity Preparations: An In Vitro Study
por: Agarwal, Shreya, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7tvr32lgbr14suiomufu7re96s