Cargando…

Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width

INTRODUCTION: Around 25% of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to medication or psychotherapy, producing significant impairment and treatment challenges. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been shown in multiple blinded trials to be a safe and durable emerging option for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beydler, Emily, Katzell, Lauren, Putinta, Kevin, Holbert, Richard, Carr, Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1142677
_version_ 1785072862289199104
author Beydler, Emily
Katzell, Lauren
Putinta, Kevin
Holbert, Richard
Carr, Brent
author_facet Beydler, Emily
Katzell, Lauren
Putinta, Kevin
Holbert, Richard
Carr, Brent
author_sort Beydler, Emily
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Around 25% of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to medication or psychotherapy, producing significant impairment and treatment challenges. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been shown in multiple blinded trials to be a safe and durable emerging option for treatment-refractory OCD. Intraoperative device interrogation offers a theoretical anchor for starting outpatient DBS programming; however, no definitive post-operative programming algorithm for psychiatrists exists currently. CASE: Here we present a 58-year-old female with childhood-onset, severe, intractable OCD with multiple failed trials of psychotherapy, medication, and electroconvulsive therapy. After interdisciplinary evaluation, she underwent bilateral electrode implantation targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule, nucleus accumbens (ALIC/NAc). Intraoperative interrogation afforded sparse information about a preferred lead contact or current density target. Subsequent outpatient interrogation consisted of systematic and independent mapping using monopolar cathodic stimulation with constant current. Modulating bipolar and triple monopolar configurations, amplitude, and pulse width all failed to induce observable effects. Given negligible interrogation feedback, we created an electrical field through the ALIC bilaterally, using the three most ventral contacts to create triple monopoles, with a long pulse width and moderate amperage. CONCLUSION: Three months post-programming, the patient reported significant improvement in OCD symptoms, particularly checking behaviors, with response sustained over the next several months. As with our case, the majority of DBS lead contacts do not induce affective or physiological markers in patients, complicating programming optimization. Here, we discuss an approach to titrating various stimulation parameters and purported mechanisms of physiological markers in DBS for OCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10344357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103443572023-07-14 Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width Beydler, Emily Katzell, Lauren Putinta, Kevin Holbert, Richard Carr, Brent Front Psychiatry Psychiatry INTRODUCTION: Around 25% of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) do not respond to medication or psychotherapy, producing significant impairment and treatment challenges. Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been shown in multiple blinded trials to be a safe and durable emerging option for treatment-refractory OCD. Intraoperative device interrogation offers a theoretical anchor for starting outpatient DBS programming; however, no definitive post-operative programming algorithm for psychiatrists exists currently. CASE: Here we present a 58-year-old female with childhood-onset, severe, intractable OCD with multiple failed trials of psychotherapy, medication, and electroconvulsive therapy. After interdisciplinary evaluation, she underwent bilateral electrode implantation targeting the anterior limb of the internal capsule, nucleus accumbens (ALIC/NAc). Intraoperative interrogation afforded sparse information about a preferred lead contact or current density target. Subsequent outpatient interrogation consisted of systematic and independent mapping using monopolar cathodic stimulation with constant current. Modulating bipolar and triple monopolar configurations, amplitude, and pulse width all failed to induce observable effects. Given negligible interrogation feedback, we created an electrical field through the ALIC bilaterally, using the three most ventral contacts to create triple monopoles, with a long pulse width and moderate amperage. CONCLUSION: Three months post-programming, the patient reported significant improvement in OCD symptoms, particularly checking behaviors, with response sustained over the next several months. As with our case, the majority of DBS lead contacts do not induce affective or physiological markers in patients, complicating programming optimization. Here, we discuss an approach to titrating various stimulation parameters and purported mechanisms of physiological markers in DBS for OCD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10344357/ /pubmed/37457764 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1142677 Text en Copyright © 2023 Beydler, Katzell, Putinta, Holbert and Carr. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Beydler, Emily
Katzell, Lauren
Putinta, Kevin
Holbert, Richard
Carr, Brent
Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title_full Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title_fullStr Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title_full_unstemmed Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title_short Deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
title_sort deep brain stimulation programming for intractable obsessive–compulsive disorder using a long pulse width
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457764
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1142677
work_keys_str_mv AT beydleremily deepbrainstimulationprogrammingforintractableobsessivecompulsivedisorderusingalongpulsewidth
AT katzelllauren deepbrainstimulationprogrammingforintractableobsessivecompulsivedisorderusingalongpulsewidth
AT putintakevin deepbrainstimulationprogrammingforintractableobsessivecompulsivedisorderusingalongpulsewidth
AT holbertrichard deepbrainstimulationprogrammingforintractableobsessivecompulsivedisorderusingalongpulsewidth
AT carrbrent deepbrainstimulationprogrammingforintractableobsessivecompulsivedisorderusingalongpulsewidth