Cargando…
Three-dimensional strength reduction and two-dimensional limit equilibrium methods of slope stability analysis
Landslides caused tremendous damage to the life and properties of society. In this study, cut slopes were analyzed using the two-dimensional (2D) limit equilibrium method (LEM) by slope/w software and a three-dimensional (3D) strength reduction method (SRM) by using Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Conti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344803/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37456009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17966 |
Sumario: | Landslides caused tremendous damage to the life and properties of society. In this study, cut slopes were analyzed using the two-dimensional (2D) limit equilibrium method (LEM) by slope/w software and a three-dimensional (3D) strength reduction method (SRM) by using Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions (FLAC3D), which is a finite difference method (FDM) numerical software. Analysis of the slope is done by representative soil samples collected and transported to the laboratory to determine input parameters like unit weight (γ), shear strength parameters (c,φ), and the water level position. Strength parameters were determined from direct shear tests for cohesionless soil and consolidated undrained (CU) triaxial tests for cohesive soils. For 2D analysis, the factor of safety (FOS) was calculated for the condition of dry and maximum water levels using Morgenstern-price methods, and the analysis gave FOS 0.743 and 0.614 for the dry and maximum water level conditions, respectively; for SRM, the input parameters of bulk and shear modulus (B, G) which were determined from the empirical equation using modulus of elasticity(E) and Poisson's ratio(ʋ). Moreover, ʋ were adjusted according to the principle of φ-v inequality. For 2D analysis, FOS were 0.743 and 0.614 for dry and maximum water levels using Morgenstern-price methods, whereas 3D analysis gave FOS 0.34 and 0.31 for dry and maximum water levels, respectively. From the analysis, it is concluded that 2D LEM is given higher FOS than 3D FDM. Moreover, the 3D analysis showed that velocity and displacement in the lateral Y direction were minimal and maximum in the horizontal X direction. The maximum horizontal velocity for the respective dry and maximum water level conditions gave 6.64*10(−4) m/step and 6.04*10(−4) m/step and maximum horizontal displacement 7.36 m and 6.06 m for dry and maximum water levels, respectively. |
---|