Cargando…

Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation in end-stage chronic heart failure patients with a history of surgical left ventricular restoration. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 190 patients undergoing continuous f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gyoten, Takayuki, Ono, Minoru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Nature Singapore 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01917-8
_version_ 1785072948998045696
author Gyoten, Takayuki
Ono, Minoru
author_facet Gyoten, Takayuki
Ono, Minoru
author_sort Gyoten, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation in end-stage chronic heart failure patients with a history of surgical left ventricular restoration. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 190 patients undergoing continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation at our center from November 2007 to April 2020. In total, six patients underwent continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after various types of surgical left ventricular restoration procedures, including endoventricular circular patch plasty (n = 3), posterior restoration procedure (n = 2), and septal anterior ventricular exclusion (n = 1). RESULTS: Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 1; HeartMate II, n = 1; DuraHeart, n = 1; HVAD, n = 1) was successfully implanted in all patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range, 39–60 months; censoring heart transplantation), no death was documented, which means that overall survival after left ventricular assist device implantation was 100% at any time point. Finally, three patients received heart transplantation (waiting time: 39, 56, and 61 months, respectively) and the other three patients are still awaiting heart transplantation (waiting time: 12, 41, and 76 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after surgical left ventricular restoration was safe and feasible, even if an endoventricular patch was used, and effective for bridge to transplant strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11748-023-01917-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10344836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Nature Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103448362023-07-15 Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration Gyoten, Takayuki Ono, Minoru Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation in end-stage chronic heart failure patients with a history of surgical left ventricular restoration. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 190 patients undergoing continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation at our center from November 2007 to April 2020. In total, six patients underwent continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after various types of surgical left ventricular restoration procedures, including endoventricular circular patch plasty (n = 3), posterior restoration procedure (n = 2), and septal anterior ventricular exclusion (n = 1). RESULTS: Continuous flow left ventricular assist device (Jarvik 2000, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 1; HeartMate II, n = 1; DuraHeart, n = 1; HVAD, n = 1) was successfully implanted in all patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range, 39–60 months; censoring heart transplantation), no death was documented, which means that overall survival after left ventricular assist device implantation was 100% at any time point. Finally, three patients received heart transplantation (waiting time: 39, 56, and 61 months, respectively) and the other three patients are still awaiting heart transplantation (waiting time: 12, 41, and 76 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our series, continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after surgical left ventricular restoration was safe and feasible, even if an endoventricular patch was used, and effective for bridge to transplant strategy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11748-023-01917-8. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-02-21 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10344836/ /pubmed/36810746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01917-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gyoten, Takayuki
Ono, Minoru
Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title_full Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title_fullStr Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title_short Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
title_sort outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-01917-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gyotentakayuki outcomesofcontinuousflowleftventricularassistdeviceaftersurgicalleftventricularrestoration
AT onominoru outcomesofcontinuousflowleftventricularassistdeviceaftersurgicalleftventricularrestoration