Cargando…

Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire

From August 2020 to June 2021, we assessed the efficacy of SumiShield 50WG (clothianidin), Fludora Fusion 56.25WP-SB (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) and Actellic 300CS (pirimiphos-methyl) in experimental huts when partially sprayed against wild, free-flying populations of Anopheles gambia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chabi, Joseph, Seyoum, Aklilu, Edi, Constant V. A., Kouassi, Bernard Loukou, Yihdego, Yemane, Oxborough, Richard, Gbalegba, Constant G. N., Johns, Ben, Desale, Sameer, Irish, Seth R., Gimnig, John E., Carlson, Jenny S., Yoshimizu, Melissa, Armistead, Jennifer S., Belemvire, Allison, Gerberg, Lilia, George, Kristen, Kirby, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38583-y
_version_ 1785072956438740992
author Chabi, Joseph
Seyoum, Aklilu
Edi, Constant V. A.
Kouassi, Bernard Loukou
Yihdego, Yemane
Oxborough, Richard
Gbalegba, Constant G. N.
Johns, Ben
Desale, Sameer
Irish, Seth R.
Gimnig, John E.
Carlson, Jenny S.
Yoshimizu, Melissa
Armistead, Jennifer S.
Belemvire, Allison
Gerberg, Lilia
George, Kristen
Kirby, Matthew
author_facet Chabi, Joseph
Seyoum, Aklilu
Edi, Constant V. A.
Kouassi, Bernard Loukou
Yihdego, Yemane
Oxborough, Richard
Gbalegba, Constant G. N.
Johns, Ben
Desale, Sameer
Irish, Seth R.
Gimnig, John E.
Carlson, Jenny S.
Yoshimizu, Melissa
Armistead, Jennifer S.
Belemvire, Allison
Gerberg, Lilia
George, Kristen
Kirby, Matthew
author_sort Chabi, Joseph
collection PubMed
description From August 2020 to June 2021, we assessed the efficacy of SumiShield 50WG (clothianidin), Fludora Fusion 56.25WP-SB (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) and Actellic 300CS (pirimiphos-methyl) in experimental huts when partially sprayed against wild, free-flying populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire. A one-month baseline period of mosquito collections was conducted to determine mosquito density and resting behavior in unsprayed huts, after which two treatments of partial indoor residual spraying (IRS) were tested: spraying only the top half of walls + ceilings or only the bottom half of walls + ceilings. These were compared to fully sprayed applications using the three IRS insecticide formulations, during twenty nights per month of collection for nine consecutive months. Mortality was assessed at the time of collection, and after a 24 h holding period (Actellic) or up to 120 h (SumiShield and Fludora Fusion). Unsprayed huts were used as a negative control. The efficacy of each partially sprayed treatment of each insecticide was compared monthly to the fully sprayed huts over the study period with a non-inferiority margin set at 10%. The residual efficacy of each insecticide sprayed was also monitored. A total of 2197 Anopheles gambiae s.l. were collected during the baseline and 17,835 during the 9-month period after spraying. During baseline, 42.6% were collected on the bottom half versus 24.3% collected on the top half of the walls, and 33.1% on the ceilings. Over the nine-month post treatment period, 73.5% were collected on the bottom half of the wall, 11.6% collected on the top half and 14.8% on the ceilings. For Actellic, the mean mortality over the nine-month period was 88.5% [87.7, 89.3] for fully sprayed huts, 88.3% [85.1, 91.4] for bottom half + ceiling sprayed walls and 80.8% [74.5, 87.1] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For Fludora Fusion an overall mean mortality of 85.6% [81.5, 89.7] was recorded for fully sprayed huts, 83.7% [82.9, 84.5] for bottom half + ceiling sprayed huts and 81.3% [79.6, 83.0] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For SumiShield, the overall mean mortality was 86.7% [85.3, 88.1] for fully sprayed huts, 85.6% [85.4, 85.8] for the bottom half + ceiling sprayed huts and 76.9% [76.6, 77.3] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For Fludora Fusion, both iterations of partial IRS were non-inferior to full spraying. However, for SumiShield and Actellic, this was true only for the huts with the bottom half + ceiling, reflecting the resting site preference of the local vectors. The results of this study suggest that partial spraying may be a way to reduce the cost of IRS without substantially compromising IRS efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10344869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103448692023-07-15 Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire Chabi, Joseph Seyoum, Aklilu Edi, Constant V. A. Kouassi, Bernard Loukou Yihdego, Yemane Oxborough, Richard Gbalegba, Constant G. N. Johns, Ben Desale, Sameer Irish, Seth R. Gimnig, John E. Carlson, Jenny S. Yoshimizu, Melissa Armistead, Jennifer S. Belemvire, Allison Gerberg, Lilia George, Kristen Kirby, Matthew Sci Rep Article From August 2020 to June 2021, we assessed the efficacy of SumiShield 50WG (clothianidin), Fludora Fusion 56.25WP-SB (mixture of clothianidin and deltamethrin) and Actellic 300CS (pirimiphos-methyl) in experimental huts when partially sprayed against wild, free-flying populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire. A one-month baseline period of mosquito collections was conducted to determine mosquito density and resting behavior in unsprayed huts, after which two treatments of partial indoor residual spraying (IRS) were tested: spraying only the top half of walls + ceilings or only the bottom half of walls + ceilings. These were compared to fully sprayed applications using the three IRS insecticide formulations, during twenty nights per month of collection for nine consecutive months. Mortality was assessed at the time of collection, and after a 24 h holding period (Actellic) or up to 120 h (SumiShield and Fludora Fusion). Unsprayed huts were used as a negative control. The efficacy of each partially sprayed treatment of each insecticide was compared monthly to the fully sprayed huts over the study period with a non-inferiority margin set at 10%. The residual efficacy of each insecticide sprayed was also monitored. A total of 2197 Anopheles gambiae s.l. were collected during the baseline and 17,835 during the 9-month period after spraying. During baseline, 42.6% were collected on the bottom half versus 24.3% collected on the top half of the walls, and 33.1% on the ceilings. Over the nine-month post treatment period, 73.5% were collected on the bottom half of the wall, 11.6% collected on the top half and 14.8% on the ceilings. For Actellic, the mean mortality over the nine-month period was 88.5% [87.7, 89.3] for fully sprayed huts, 88.3% [85.1, 91.4] for bottom half + ceiling sprayed walls and 80.8% [74.5, 87.1] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For Fludora Fusion an overall mean mortality of 85.6% [81.5, 89.7] was recorded for fully sprayed huts, 83.7% [82.9, 84.5] for bottom half + ceiling sprayed huts and 81.3% [79.6, 83.0] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For SumiShield, the overall mean mortality was 86.7% [85.3, 88.1] for fully sprayed huts, 85.6% [85.4, 85.8] for the bottom half + ceiling sprayed huts and 76.9% [76.6, 77.3] for the top half + ceiling sprayed huts. For Fludora Fusion, both iterations of partial IRS were non-inferior to full spraying. However, for SumiShield and Actellic, this was true only for the huts with the bottom half + ceiling, reflecting the resting site preference of the local vectors. The results of this study suggest that partial spraying may be a way to reduce the cost of IRS without substantially compromising IRS efficacy. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10344869/ /pubmed/37443329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38583-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Chabi, Joseph
Seyoum, Aklilu
Edi, Constant V. A.
Kouassi, Bernard Loukou
Yihdego, Yemane
Oxborough, Richard
Gbalegba, Constant G. N.
Johns, Ben
Desale, Sameer
Irish, Seth R.
Gimnig, John E.
Carlson, Jenny S.
Yoshimizu, Melissa
Armistead, Jennifer S.
Belemvire, Allison
Gerberg, Lilia
George, Kristen
Kirby, Matthew
Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title_full Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title_fullStr Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title_short Efficacy of partial spraying of SumiShield, Fludora Fusion and Actellic against wild populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in Tiassalé, Côte d'Ivoire
title_sort efficacy of partial spraying of sumishield, fludora fusion and actellic against wild populations of anopheles gambiae s.l. in experimental huts in tiassalé, côte d'ivoire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38583-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chabijoseph efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT seyoumaklilu efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT ediconstantva efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT kouassibernardloukou efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT yihdegoyemane efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT oxboroughrichard efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT gbalegbaconstantgn efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT johnsben efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT desalesameer efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT irishsethr efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT gimnigjohne efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT carlsonjennys efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT yoshimizumelissa efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT armisteadjennifers efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT belemvireallison efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT gerberglilia efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT georgekristen efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire
AT kirbymatthew efficacyofpartialsprayingofsumishieldfludorafusionandactellicagainstwildpopulationsofanophelesgambiaeslinexperimentalhutsintiassalecotedivoire