Cargando…
Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1 |
_version_ | 1785072959063326720 |
---|---|
author | Schwyzer, Moritz Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Waelti, Stephan L. Walter, Joan Elias Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Hofbauer, Marlena Maurer, Alexander Huellner, Martin W. Messerli, Michael |
author_facet | Schwyzer, Moritz Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Waelti, Stephan L. Walter, Joan Elias Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Hofbauer, Marlena Maurer, Alexander Huellner, Martin W. Messerli, Michael |
author_sort | Schwyzer, Moritz |
collection | PubMed |
description | To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) with a beta-value of 450 and 600 were created. A machine learning classifier was fed with 283 images rated “sufficient image quality” and 117 images rated “insufficient image quality”. The classification performance of the machine learning classifier was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) using reader-based classification as the target. Classification performance of the machine learning classifier was AUC 0.978 for BSREM beta 450 and 0.967 for BSREM beta 600. The algorithm showed a sensitivity of 89% and 94% and a specificity of 94% and 94% for the reconstruction BSREM 450 and 600, respectively. Automated assessment of image quality from F18-FDG-PET images using a machine learning classifier provides equivalent performance to manual assessment by experienced radiologists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10344880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103448802023-07-15 Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system Schwyzer, Moritz Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Waelti, Stephan L. Walter, Joan Elias Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Hofbauer, Marlena Maurer, Alexander Huellner, Martin W. Messerli, Michael Sci Rep Article To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) with a beta-value of 450 and 600 were created. A machine learning classifier was fed with 283 images rated “sufficient image quality” and 117 images rated “insufficient image quality”. The classification performance of the machine learning classifier was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) using reader-based classification as the target. Classification performance of the machine learning classifier was AUC 0.978 for BSREM beta 450 and 0.967 for BSREM beta 600. The algorithm showed a sensitivity of 89% and 94% and a specificity of 94% and 94% for the reconstruction BSREM 450 and 600, respectively. Automated assessment of image quality from F18-FDG-PET images using a machine learning classifier provides equivalent performance to manual assessment by experienced radiologists. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10344880/ /pubmed/37443158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Schwyzer, Moritz Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Waelti, Stephan L. Walter, Joan Elias Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Hofbauer, Marlena Maurer, Alexander Huellner, Martin W. Messerli, Michael Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title | Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title_full | Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title_fullStr | Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title_short | Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
title_sort | automated f18-fdg pet/ct image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwyzermoritz automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT skawranstephan automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT gennariantoniog automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT waeltistephanl automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT walterjoanelias automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT curionifontecedroalessandra automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT hofbauermarlena automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT maureralexander automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT huellnermartinw automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem AT messerlimichael automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem |