Cargando…

Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system

To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwyzer, Moritz, Skawran, Stephan, Gennari, Antonio G., Waelti, Stephan L., Walter, Joan Elias, Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra, Hofbauer, Marlena, Maurer, Alexander, Huellner, Martin W., Messerli, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1
_version_ 1785072959063326720
author Schwyzer, Moritz
Skawran, Stephan
Gennari, Antonio G.
Waelti, Stephan L.
Walter, Joan Elias
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Hofbauer, Marlena
Maurer, Alexander
Huellner, Martin W.
Messerli, Michael
author_facet Schwyzer, Moritz
Skawran, Stephan
Gennari, Antonio G.
Waelti, Stephan L.
Walter, Joan Elias
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Hofbauer, Marlena
Maurer, Alexander
Huellner, Martin W.
Messerli, Michael
author_sort Schwyzer, Moritz
collection PubMed
description To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) with a beta-value of 450 and 600 were created. A machine learning classifier was fed with 283 images rated “sufficient image quality” and 117 images rated “insufficient image quality”. The classification performance of the machine learning classifier was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) using reader-based classification as the target. Classification performance of the machine learning classifier was AUC 0.978 for BSREM beta 450 and 0.967 for BSREM beta 600. The algorithm showed a sensitivity of 89% and 94% and a specificity of 94% and 94% for the reconstruction BSREM 450 and 600, respectively. Automated assessment of image quality from F18-FDG-PET images using a machine learning classifier provides equivalent performance to manual assessment by experienced radiologists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10344880
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103448802023-07-15 Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system Schwyzer, Moritz Skawran, Stephan Gennari, Antonio G. Waelti, Stephan L. Walter, Joan Elias Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra Hofbauer, Marlena Maurer, Alexander Huellner, Martin W. Messerli, Michael Sci Rep Article To evaluate whether a machine learning classifier can evaluate image quality of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images from F18-FDG-PET scans. A total of 400 MIP images from F18-FDG-PET with simulated decreasing acquisition time (120 s, 90 s, 60 s, 30 s and 15 s per bed-position) using block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) with a beta-value of 450 and 600 were created. A machine learning classifier was fed with 283 images rated “sufficient image quality” and 117 images rated “insufficient image quality”. The classification performance of the machine learning classifier was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) using reader-based classification as the target. Classification performance of the machine learning classifier was AUC 0.978 for BSREM beta 450 and 0.967 for BSREM beta 600. The algorithm showed a sensitivity of 89% and 94% and a specificity of 94% and 94% for the reconstruction BSREM 450 and 600, respectively. Automated assessment of image quality from F18-FDG-PET images using a machine learning classifier provides equivalent performance to manual assessment by experienced radiologists. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10344880/ /pubmed/37443158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schwyzer, Moritz
Skawran, Stephan
Gennari, Antonio G.
Waelti, Stephan L.
Walter, Joan Elias
Curioni-Fontecedro, Alessandra
Hofbauer, Marlena
Maurer, Alexander
Huellner, Martin W.
Messerli, Michael
Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title_full Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title_fullStr Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title_full_unstemmed Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title_short Automated F18-FDG PET/CT image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
title_sort automated f18-fdg pet/ct image quality assessment using deep neural networks on a latest 6-ring digital detector system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344880/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37443158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37182-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schwyzermoritz automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT skawranstephan automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT gennariantoniog automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT waeltistephanl automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT walterjoanelias automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT curionifontecedroalessandra automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT hofbauermarlena automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT maureralexander automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT huellnermartinw automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem
AT messerlimichael automatedf18fdgpetctimagequalityassessmentusingdeepneuralnetworksonalatest6ringdigitaldetectorsystem