Cargando…
A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4 |
_version_ | 1785072981819523072 |
---|---|
author | van Dam, Maureen de Jong, Brigit A. Willemse, Eline A. J. Nauta, Ilse M. Huiskamp, Marijn Klein, Martin Moraal, Bastiaan de Geus-Driessen, Sanne Geurts, Jeroen J. G. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Teunissen, Charlotte E. Hulst, Hanneke E. |
author_facet | van Dam, Maureen de Jong, Brigit A. Willemse, Eline A. J. Nauta, Ilse M. Huiskamp, Marijn Klein, Martin Moraal, Bastiaan de Geus-Driessen, Sanne Geurts, Jeroen J. G. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Teunissen, Charlotte E. Hulst, Hanneke E. |
author_sort | van Dam, Maureen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of multimodal (bio)markers: i.e., serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and conventional imaging markers in predicting cognitive functioning in PwMS. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS (56 females, disease duration = 14 ± 9 years) underwent neuropsychological and neurological examination, structural magnetic resonance imaging, blood sampling and lumbar puncture. PwMS were classified as cognitively impaired (CI) if scoring ≥ 1.5SD below normative scores on ≥ 20% of test scores. Otherwise, PwMS were defined as cognitively preserved (CP). Association between fluid and imaging (bio)markers were investigated, as well as binary logistics regression to predict cognitive status. Finally, a multimodal marker was calculated using statistically important predictors of cognitive status. RESULTS: Only higher NfL levels (in serum and CSF) correlated with worse processing speed (r = − 0.286, p = 0.012 and r = − 0.364, p = 0.007, respectively). sNfL added unique variance in the prediction of cognitive status on top of grey matter volume (NGMV), p = 0.002). A multimodal marker of NGMV and sNfL yielded most promising results in predicting cognitive status (sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 58%). CONCLUSION: Fluid and imaging (bio)markers reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and cannot be used interchangeably as markers for cognitive functioning in PwMS. The use of a multimodal marker, i.e., the combination of grey matter volume and sNfL, seems most promising for detecting cognitive deficits in MS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10344976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103449762023-07-15 A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort van Dam, Maureen de Jong, Brigit A. Willemse, Eline A. J. Nauta, Ilse M. Huiskamp, Marijn Klein, Martin Moraal, Bastiaan de Geus-Driessen, Sanne Geurts, Jeroen J. G. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Teunissen, Charlotte E. Hulst, Hanneke E. J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of multimodal (bio)markers: i.e., serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and conventional imaging markers in predicting cognitive functioning in PwMS. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS (56 females, disease duration = 14 ± 9 years) underwent neuropsychological and neurological examination, structural magnetic resonance imaging, blood sampling and lumbar puncture. PwMS were classified as cognitively impaired (CI) if scoring ≥ 1.5SD below normative scores on ≥ 20% of test scores. Otherwise, PwMS were defined as cognitively preserved (CP). Association between fluid and imaging (bio)markers were investigated, as well as binary logistics regression to predict cognitive status. Finally, a multimodal marker was calculated using statistically important predictors of cognitive status. RESULTS: Only higher NfL levels (in serum and CSF) correlated with worse processing speed (r = − 0.286, p = 0.012 and r = − 0.364, p = 0.007, respectively). sNfL added unique variance in the prediction of cognitive status on top of grey matter volume (NGMV), p = 0.002). A multimodal marker of NGMV and sNfL yielded most promising results in predicting cognitive status (sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 58%). CONCLUSION: Fluid and imaging (bio)markers reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and cannot be used interchangeably as markers for cognitive functioning in PwMS. The use of a multimodal marker, i.e., the combination of grey matter volume and sNfL, seems most promising for detecting cognitive deficits in MS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10344976/ /pubmed/37101095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Communication van Dam, Maureen de Jong, Brigit A. Willemse, Eline A. J. Nauta, Ilse M. Huiskamp, Marijn Klein, Martin Moraal, Bastiaan de Geus-Driessen, Sanne Geurts, Jeroen J. G. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Teunissen, Charlotte E. Hulst, Hanneke E. A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title | A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title_full | A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title_fullStr | A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title_short | A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
title_sort | multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of nfl, gfap and conventional mri in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandammaureen amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT dejongbrigita amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT willemseelineaj amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT nautailsem amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT huiskampmarijn amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT kleinmartin amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT moraalbastiaan amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT degeusdriessensanne amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT geurtsjeroenjg amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT uitdehaagbernardmj amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT teunissencharlottee amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT hulsthannekee amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT vandammaureen multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT dejongbrigita multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT willemseelineaj multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT nautailsem multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT huiskampmarijn multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT kleinmartin multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT moraalbastiaan multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT degeusdriessensanne multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT geurtsjeroenjg multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT uitdehaagbernardmj multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT teunissencharlottee multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort AT hulsthannekee multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort |