Cargando…

A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dam, Maureen, de Jong, Brigit A., Willemse, Eline A. J., Nauta, Ilse M., Huiskamp, Marijn, Klein, Martin, Moraal, Bastiaan, de Geus-Driessen, Sanne, Geurts, Jeroen J. G., Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J., Teunissen, Charlotte E., Hulst, Hanneke E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4
_version_ 1785072981819523072
author van Dam, Maureen
de Jong, Brigit A.
Willemse, Eline A. J.
Nauta, Ilse M.
Huiskamp, Marijn
Klein, Martin
Moraal, Bastiaan
de Geus-Driessen, Sanne
Geurts, Jeroen J. G.
Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J.
Teunissen, Charlotte E.
Hulst, Hanneke E.
author_facet van Dam, Maureen
de Jong, Brigit A.
Willemse, Eline A. J.
Nauta, Ilse M.
Huiskamp, Marijn
Klein, Martin
Moraal, Bastiaan
de Geus-Driessen, Sanne
Geurts, Jeroen J. G.
Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J.
Teunissen, Charlotte E.
Hulst, Hanneke E.
author_sort van Dam, Maureen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of multimodal (bio)markers: i.e., serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and conventional imaging markers in predicting cognitive functioning in PwMS. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS (56 females, disease duration = 14 ± 9 years) underwent neuropsychological and neurological examination, structural magnetic resonance imaging, blood sampling and lumbar puncture. PwMS were classified as cognitively impaired (CI) if scoring ≥ 1.5SD below normative scores on ≥ 20% of test scores. Otherwise, PwMS were defined as cognitively preserved (CP). Association between fluid and imaging (bio)markers were investigated, as well as binary logistics regression to predict cognitive status. Finally, a multimodal marker was calculated using statistically important predictors of cognitive status. RESULTS: Only higher NfL levels (in serum and CSF) correlated with worse processing speed (r = − 0.286, p = 0.012 and r = − 0.364, p = 0.007, respectively). sNfL added unique variance in the prediction of cognitive status on top of grey matter volume (NGMV), p = 0.002). A multimodal marker of NGMV and sNfL yielded most promising results in predicting cognitive status (sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 58%). CONCLUSION: Fluid and imaging (bio)markers reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and cannot be used interchangeably as markers for cognitive functioning in PwMS. The use of a multimodal marker, i.e., the combination of grey matter volume and sNfL, seems most promising for detecting cognitive deficits in MS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10344976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103449762023-07-15 A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort van Dam, Maureen de Jong, Brigit A. Willemse, Eline A. J. Nauta, Ilse M. Huiskamp, Marijn Klein, Martin Moraal, Bastiaan de Geus-Driessen, Sanne Geurts, Jeroen J. G. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Teunissen, Charlotte E. Hulst, Hanneke E. J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment in people with MS (PwMS) has primarily been investigated using conventional imaging markers or fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration separately. However, the single use of these markers do only partially explain the large heterogeneity found in PwMS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of multimodal (bio)markers: i.e., serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and conventional imaging markers in predicting cognitive functioning in PwMS. METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS (56 females, disease duration = 14 ± 9 years) underwent neuropsychological and neurological examination, structural magnetic resonance imaging, blood sampling and lumbar puncture. PwMS were classified as cognitively impaired (CI) if scoring ≥ 1.5SD below normative scores on ≥ 20% of test scores. Otherwise, PwMS were defined as cognitively preserved (CP). Association between fluid and imaging (bio)markers were investigated, as well as binary logistics regression to predict cognitive status. Finally, a multimodal marker was calculated using statistically important predictors of cognitive status. RESULTS: Only higher NfL levels (in serum and CSF) correlated with worse processing speed (r = − 0.286, p = 0.012 and r = − 0.364, p = 0.007, respectively). sNfL added unique variance in the prediction of cognitive status on top of grey matter volume (NGMV), p = 0.002). A multimodal marker of NGMV and sNfL yielded most promising results in predicting cognitive status (sensitivity = 85%, specificity = 58%). CONCLUSION: Fluid and imaging (bio)markers reflect different aspects of neurodegeneration and cannot be used interchangeably as markers for cognitive functioning in PwMS. The use of a multimodal marker, i.e., the combination of grey matter volume and sNfL, seems most promising for detecting cognitive deficits in MS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-04-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10344976/ /pubmed/37101095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
van Dam, Maureen
de Jong, Brigit A.
Willemse, Eline A. J.
Nauta, Ilse M.
Huiskamp, Marijn
Klein, Martin
Moraal, Bastiaan
de Geus-Driessen, Sanne
Geurts, Jeroen J. G.
Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J.
Teunissen, Charlotte E.
Hulst, Hanneke E.
A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title_full A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title_fullStr A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title_full_unstemmed A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title_short A multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of NfL, GFAP and conventional MRI in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
title_sort multimodal marker for cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis: the role of nfl, gfap and conventional mri in predicting cognitive functioning in a prospective clinical cohort
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10344976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11676-4
work_keys_str_mv AT vandammaureen amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT dejongbrigita amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT willemseelineaj amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT nautailsem amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT huiskampmarijn amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT kleinmartin amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT moraalbastiaan amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT degeusdriessensanne amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT geurtsjeroenjg amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT uitdehaagbernardmj amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT teunissencharlottee amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT hulsthannekee amultimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT vandammaureen multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT dejongbrigita multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT willemseelineaj multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT nautailsem multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT huiskampmarijn multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT kleinmartin multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT moraalbastiaan multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT degeusdriessensanne multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT geurtsjeroenjg multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT uitdehaagbernardmj multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT teunissencharlottee multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort
AT hulsthannekee multimodalmarkerforcognitivefunctioninginmultiplesclerosistheroleofnflgfapandconventionalmriinpredictingcognitivefunctioninginaprospectiveclinicalcohort