Cargando…

Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures

Detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is hampered by low sensitivity of rectal swab cultures. This study aimed to define the number of screening cultures needed to increase sensitivity to detect VRE transmission, and to determine time from presumed exposure to detectable colon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wammes, Linda J., Voor in ’t holt, Anne F., Klaassen, Corné H.W., Vos, Margreet C., Verkaik, Nelianne J., Severin, Juliëtte A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7
_version_ 1785072988098396160
author Wammes, Linda J.
Voor in ’t holt, Anne F.
Klaassen, Corné H.W.
Vos, Margreet C.
Verkaik, Nelianne J.
Severin, Juliëtte A.
author_facet Wammes, Linda J.
Voor in ’t holt, Anne F.
Klaassen, Corné H.W.
Vos, Margreet C.
Verkaik, Nelianne J.
Severin, Juliëtte A.
author_sort Wammes, Linda J.
collection PubMed
description Detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is hampered by low sensitivity of rectal swab cultures. This study aimed to define the number of screening cultures needed to increase sensitivity to detect VRE transmission, and to determine time from presumed exposure to detectable colonization. In a tertiary care setting, we retrospectively analyzed data from 9 VRE outbreaks. As a proxy or estimation for time to detectable colonization, the time between first positive culture of the presumed index patient and that of their contacts was determined. Only 64% of secondary cases were positive in the first out of five cultures. By using the first three out of five rectal swabs, 89% (95%CI: 78–95%) of all secondary cases would have been identified. The median number of days between the positive culture of the index patient and the first positive culture of secondary cases was 9 days. Eleven percent of secondary cases would have been missed if only three rectal samples would have been obtained. Furthermore, our results show that one or more rectal swabs taken around day 9 after presumed exposure should at least be included in the screening approach. In our setting, obtaining a fourth and a fifth rectal swab showed a relevant additional value compared to only one to three swabs. Our findings are useful for determining the most effective VRE contact tracing approach to prevent transmission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103450052023-07-15 Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures Wammes, Linda J. Voor in ’t holt, Anne F. Klaassen, Corné H.W. Vos, Margreet C. Verkaik, Nelianne J. Severin, Juliëtte A. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article Detection of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is hampered by low sensitivity of rectal swab cultures. This study aimed to define the number of screening cultures needed to increase sensitivity to detect VRE transmission, and to determine time from presumed exposure to detectable colonization. In a tertiary care setting, we retrospectively analyzed data from 9 VRE outbreaks. As a proxy or estimation for time to detectable colonization, the time between first positive culture of the presumed index patient and that of their contacts was determined. Only 64% of secondary cases were positive in the first out of five cultures. By using the first three out of five rectal swabs, 89% (95%CI: 78–95%) of all secondary cases would have been identified. The median number of days between the positive culture of the index patient and the first positive culture of secondary cases was 9 days. Eleven percent of secondary cases would have been missed if only three rectal samples would have been obtained. Furthermore, our results show that one or more rectal swabs taken around day 9 after presumed exposure should at least be included in the screening approach. In our setting, obtaining a fourth and a fifth rectal swab showed a relevant additional value compared to only one to three swabs. Our findings are useful for determining the most effective VRE contact tracing approach to prevent transmission. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10345005/ /pubmed/37351725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wammes, Linda J.
Voor in ’t holt, Anne F.
Klaassen, Corné H.W.
Vos, Margreet C.
Verkaik, Nelianne J.
Severin, Juliëtte A.
Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title_full Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title_fullStr Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title_full_unstemmed Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title_short Contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE): evaluation of the Dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
title_sort contact tracing for vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium (vre): evaluation of the dutch policy of quintuple screening cultures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-023-04632-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wammeslindaj contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures
AT voorintholtannef contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures
AT klaassencornehw contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures
AT vosmargreetc contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures
AT verkaikneliannej contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures
AT severinjuliettea contacttracingforvancomycinresistantenterococcusfaeciumvreevaluationofthedutchpolicyofquintuplescreeningcultures