Cargando…

Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service

AIMS: The Specialist Adolescent Mental Health Service at the Maudsley Hospital provides multi-disciplinary mental health care to adolescents in London. There is currently no policy by which non-medical members of the multi-disciplinary team can request a psychiatric review for their patients. Staff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dessain, Amabel, Dionelis, Karolos, Ingrassia, Anto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.267
_version_ 1785073080521981952
author Dessain, Amabel
Dionelis, Karolos
Ingrassia, Anto
author_facet Dessain, Amabel
Dionelis, Karolos
Ingrassia, Anto
author_sort Dessain, Amabel
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The Specialist Adolescent Mental Health Service at the Maudsley Hospital provides multi-disciplinary mental health care to adolescents in London. There is currently no policy by which non-medical members of the multi-disciplinary team can request a psychiatric review for their patients. Staff feedback revealed problems with the medical review referral process to be a lack of clarity on how to make referrals, and a lack of transparency (e.g. referral outcome, approximate waiting time).This projected aimed to improve the clarity of the process for requesting psychiatric reviews and to develop skills in leadership as a future child psychiatrist. METHODS: We designed and introduced a referral form and integrated waiting list. Next we developed a policy document for making referrals. Finally we modified the referral form so that when submitted, it automatically updated the integrated waiting list. At the outset and after each intervention we resurveyed the staff. RESULTS: At the outset 71% of staff reported finding the process somewhat unclear, while 29% reported finding the referral process neither clear nor unclear. Following the final change 100% staff each reported finding the process very clear or somewhat clear. CONCLUSION: The changes we implemented resulted in a clearer and more transparent referral process for medical reviews. We anticipate that this improved staff satisfaction will equally translate into some benefits for patient care, such as more clarity around when a medical review can be expected and what it might entail.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103454082023-07-15 Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service Dessain, Amabel Dionelis, Karolos Ingrassia, Anto BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: The Specialist Adolescent Mental Health Service at the Maudsley Hospital provides multi-disciplinary mental health care to adolescents in London. There is currently no policy by which non-medical members of the multi-disciplinary team can request a psychiatric review for their patients. Staff feedback revealed problems with the medical review referral process to be a lack of clarity on how to make referrals, and a lack of transparency (e.g. referral outcome, approximate waiting time).This projected aimed to improve the clarity of the process for requesting psychiatric reviews and to develop skills in leadership as a future child psychiatrist. METHODS: We designed and introduced a referral form and integrated waiting list. Next we developed a policy document for making referrals. Finally we modified the referral form so that when submitted, it automatically updated the integrated waiting list. At the outset and after each intervention we resurveyed the staff. RESULTS: At the outset 71% of staff reported finding the process somewhat unclear, while 29% reported finding the referral process neither clear nor unclear. Following the final change 100% staff each reported finding the process very clear or somewhat clear. CONCLUSION: The changes we implemented resulted in a clearer and more transparent referral process for medical reviews. We anticipate that this improved staff satisfaction will equally translate into some benefits for patient care, such as more clarity around when a medical review can be expected and what it might entail. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345408/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.267 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Dessain, Amabel
Dionelis, Karolos
Ingrassia, Anto
Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title_full Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title_fullStr Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title_full_unstemmed Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title_short Trainee Led Quality Improvement Addressing Lack of Transparency in Referral Processes for Psychiatric Reviews in the Maudsley Adolescent Mental Health Service
title_sort trainee led quality improvement addressing lack of transparency in referral processes for psychiatric reviews in the maudsley adolescent mental health service
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345408/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.267
work_keys_str_mv AT dessainamabel traineeledqualityimprovementaddressinglackoftransparencyinreferralprocessesforpsychiatricreviewsinthemaudsleyadolescentmentalhealthservice
AT dioneliskarolos traineeledqualityimprovementaddressinglackoftransparencyinreferralprocessesforpsychiatricreviewsinthemaudsleyadolescentmentalhealthservice
AT ingrassiaanto traineeledqualityimprovementaddressinglackoftransparencyinreferralprocessesforpsychiatricreviewsinthemaudsleyadolescentmentalhealthservice