Cargando…

Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit

AIMS: To investigate if current practice regarding the use of seclusion in an adult ID assessment and treatment unit was in keeping with the newly developed NHS Highland Seclusion Policy. METHODS: Case notes were reviewed for all patients who had had a period of seclusion between 20 September and Oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Praveen, Graves, Catriona, Jones, Sheena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345422/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.295
_version_ 1785073083864842240
author Kumar, Praveen
Graves, Catriona
Jones, Sheena
author_facet Kumar, Praveen
Graves, Catriona
Jones, Sheena
author_sort Kumar, Praveen
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To investigate if current practice regarding the use of seclusion in an adult ID assessment and treatment unit was in keeping with the newly developed NHS Highland Seclusion Policy. METHODS: Case notes were reviewed for all patients who had had a period of seclusion between 20 September and October 2022. Administration of seclusion (date; time started; medication used prior; reason for administration & duration); 15 min interval monitoring (record of patient's mental & physical state including presentation, behaviour, conscious levels, respirations & appearance). Review at 2 and 4 hours (including plans on how to end seclusion). Documented Datix submitted and Monitoring of improvements. RESULTS: Thematic analysis showed that the most common reason for the use of seclusion was due to increasing agitation and aggression. Use of anxiolytic before seclusion; Under the 15 minute interval recording - respiration rate & appearance was missed most of the times; Review at 2 hours: Plans to end seclusion was often missed; Review at 4 hours: on most occasions the duty consultant was not informed. They could give valuable insight and plans on stopping seclusion if it has prolonged more than 4 hours. Datix was not sent every time seclusion commenced and this is needed as it would further provide to better identify and manage patients needing it. CONCLUSION: Seclusion places people at risk. It is vital to ensure that there is robust monitoring of the patient's mental and physical state to reduce the risks associated with seclusion and, in particular, when medication which may lead to respiratory depression has been used. Seclusion should be used for the shortest time possible - explicit consideration of when and how to end seclusion provides an opportunity to limit the length of this highly restrictive intervention and minimise the impact on the person. The results of the audit were shared with the staff team via the Seclusion Policy Short Life Working Group and will allow subsequent drafts of the service protocol to reflect good clinical practice. Results were also shared via the internal teaching programme and at the Clinical Governance forum. An additional session will also be provided during the induction plan for new trainees. Finally, a reaudit will be done to assess changes in seclusion practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103454222023-07-15 Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit Kumar, Praveen Graves, Catriona Jones, Sheena BJPsych Open Quality Improvement AIMS: To investigate if current practice regarding the use of seclusion in an adult ID assessment and treatment unit was in keeping with the newly developed NHS Highland Seclusion Policy. METHODS: Case notes were reviewed for all patients who had had a period of seclusion between 20 September and October 2022. Administration of seclusion (date; time started; medication used prior; reason for administration & duration); 15 min interval monitoring (record of patient's mental & physical state including presentation, behaviour, conscious levels, respirations & appearance). Review at 2 and 4 hours (including plans on how to end seclusion). Documented Datix submitted and Monitoring of improvements. RESULTS: Thematic analysis showed that the most common reason for the use of seclusion was due to increasing agitation and aggression. Use of anxiolytic before seclusion; Under the 15 minute interval recording - respiration rate & appearance was missed most of the times; Review at 2 hours: Plans to end seclusion was often missed; Review at 4 hours: on most occasions the duty consultant was not informed. They could give valuable insight and plans on stopping seclusion if it has prolonged more than 4 hours. Datix was not sent every time seclusion commenced and this is needed as it would further provide to better identify and manage patients needing it. CONCLUSION: Seclusion places people at risk. It is vital to ensure that there is robust monitoring of the patient's mental and physical state to reduce the risks associated with seclusion and, in particular, when medication which may lead to respiratory depression has been used. Seclusion should be used for the shortest time possible - explicit consideration of when and how to end seclusion provides an opportunity to limit the length of this highly restrictive intervention and minimise the impact on the person. The results of the audit were shared with the staff team via the Seclusion Policy Short Life Working Group and will allow subsequent drafts of the service protocol to reflect good clinical practice. Results were also shared via the internal teaching programme and at the Clinical Governance forum. An additional session will also be provided during the induction plan for new trainees. Finally, a reaudit will be done to assess changes in seclusion practice. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345422/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.295 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement
Kumar, Praveen
Graves, Catriona
Jones, Sheena
Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title_full Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title_fullStr Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title_full_unstemmed Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title_short Audit of Seclusion Practice in an Inpatient Adult Intellectual Disability (ID) Psychiatry Unit
title_sort audit of seclusion practice in an inpatient adult intellectual disability (id) psychiatry unit
topic Quality Improvement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345422/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.295
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarpraveen auditofseclusionpracticeinaninpatientadultintellectualdisabilityidpsychiatryunit
AT gravescatriona auditofseclusionpracticeinaninpatientadultintellectualdisabilityidpsychiatryunit
AT jonessheena auditofseclusionpracticeinaninpatientadultintellectualdisabilityidpsychiatryunit