Cargando…

Recruitment and Retention Survey – What Did Speciality Trainees (STs) Say?

AIMS: Recruitment and retention of medical staff is a national issue. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (LPT) has significant challenge like many other neighbouring Trusts in this regard. Low level of staff means challenges in provision of adequate and efficient patientcare. There is a lack of fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmood, Sajid, Kunigiri, Girish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345424/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.207
Descripción
Sumario:AIMS: Recruitment and retention of medical staff is a national issue. Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (LPT) has significant challenge like many other neighbouring Trusts in this regard. Low level of staff means challenges in provision of adequate and efficient patientcare. There is a lack of flexibility for clinicians to get time for Supported Programmed Activity (SPA). Burn out of existing clinicians and loosing good will is common which increases patients’ complaint and potential risk of near misses and serious incidents. Despite the East Midland being one of the popular deaneries among STs, retention of locally trained STs post CCT remained a challenge. Thus, the aim of this study was to find out proportion of speciality trainees (STs) doctors satisfied with current job and to explore their views on current difficulties and ways to retain and support them post CCT in career progression within the training Trust. METHODS: It was a cross-sectional survey. The target population was STs working in the East Midland deanery. An online questionnaire was developed for data collection. Data were gathered through open (free text) and close (options provided) questions. Information was collected regarding job satisfaction, positive and negative of job, difficulties and challenges in current role, willingness to continue post CCT within Trust and if they would recommend friends or colleagues to join LPT. Results are reported in percentages for descriptive statistics. RESULTS: About 59% of the STs were satisfied with their current training. Key positive of jobs include helpful colleagues, good trainers and supervision, autonomy, flexibility, good on-call rota pattern, work life balance, and protected time for teaching. Interest is shown for various SPA activities (teaching, audit, QI project, research, leadership and management). However, wide variety of challenges being also reported at individual, team and organisational level. Over 70% of the participants shown interest to work for LPT post CCT but requested for additional support in term of flexibility of job description and role whereas remaining 30% reported to move into private sector due to better pay and work life balance. Surprisingly only 23.5% clearly stated, they would recommend a friend or a colleague to join LPT. CONCLUSION: Majority of STs doctors were satisfied and willing to continue working post CCT in LPT. However, reported challenges need prompt response and early discussion and planning with STs in term of what local Trust can offer and support would ensure their retention and enhance recruitment while they are being advocate for the LPT.