Cargando…
Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345446/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101 |
_version_ | 1785073089939243008 |
---|---|
author | Montgomery, Adam Ramjan, Faeez Cannon, Alistair Kohara, Sae Saunders, Chloe Umasankar, Deekshitha Zac-Williams, Lois Butler, Sophie |
author_facet | Montgomery, Adam Ramjan, Faeez Cannon, Alistair Kohara, Sae Saunders, Chloe Umasankar, Deekshitha Zac-Williams, Lois Butler, Sophie |
author_sort | Montgomery, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors and lived-experience practitioners, and consists of large-group teaching on a weekly topic, followed by small group simulations. A small-scale study was performed to evaluate whether conducting clinical communication teaching and simulation online was acceptable, effective and feasible. METHODS: Twelve students and ten faculty members participated in the online session, performing live clinical scenarios with simulated patients, over a two-hour period. Pre-and post-course questionnaires were designed with quantitative measures of confidence and qualitative questions about participants’ experience. Eight students completed both questionnaires. Questionnaire answers were analysed using a mixed-methods approach, with themes identified from the qualitative long answers, and statistical analysis of quantitative answers was also performed. RESULTS: Students found the session beneficial, with all indicating that they would sign up for a full online course. Based on answers to the quantitative questions, 50% of students felt more prepared for their clinical examinations. (p = 0.046). However, all participants noted a reduction in their ability to read non-verbal cues and body language. Returning students found they were less attentive during the session compared with the original face-to-face teaching (p = 0.05). Actors and faculty members found that the online course was feasible, acceptable and effective. However, most agreed that it was not preferable to teaching clinical communication skills face to face. Technological issues were minimal. CONCLUSION: The majority of students and faculty found the session both beneficial and enjoyable, but felt face to face sessions would be more helpful in teaching clinical communication. Student attentiveness and awareness of non-verbal cues were highlighted as concerns. However, students generally responded positively to the online course, particularly the quality and diversity of peer feedback. Teaching clinical communication virtually has the potential to be successful, and has implications for future undergraduate medical teaching. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10345446 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103454462023-07-15 Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? Montgomery, Adam Ramjan, Faeez Cannon, Alistair Kohara, Sae Saunders, Chloe Umasankar, Deekshitha Zac-Williams, Lois Butler, Sophie BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Presentations AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors and lived-experience practitioners, and consists of large-group teaching on a weekly topic, followed by small group simulations. A small-scale study was performed to evaluate whether conducting clinical communication teaching and simulation online was acceptable, effective and feasible. METHODS: Twelve students and ten faculty members participated in the online session, performing live clinical scenarios with simulated patients, over a two-hour period. Pre-and post-course questionnaires were designed with quantitative measures of confidence and qualitative questions about participants’ experience. Eight students completed both questionnaires. Questionnaire answers were analysed using a mixed-methods approach, with themes identified from the qualitative long answers, and statistical analysis of quantitative answers was also performed. RESULTS: Students found the session beneficial, with all indicating that they would sign up for a full online course. Based on answers to the quantitative questions, 50% of students felt more prepared for their clinical examinations. (p = 0.046). However, all participants noted a reduction in their ability to read non-verbal cues and body language. Returning students found they were less attentive during the session compared with the original face-to-face teaching (p = 0.05). Actors and faculty members found that the online course was feasible, acceptable and effective. However, most agreed that it was not preferable to teaching clinical communication skills face to face. Technological issues were minimal. CONCLUSION: The majority of students and faculty found the session both beneficial and enjoyable, but felt face to face sessions would be more helpful in teaching clinical communication. Student attentiveness and awareness of non-verbal cues were highlighted as concerns. However, students generally responded positively to the online course, particularly the quality and diversity of peer feedback. Teaching clinical communication virtually has the potential to be successful, and has implications for future undergraduate medical teaching. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345446/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine. |
spellingShingle | Rapid-Fire Presentations Montgomery, Adam Ramjan, Faeez Cannon, Alistair Kohara, Sae Saunders, Chloe Umasankar, Deekshitha Zac-Williams, Lois Butler, Sophie Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title | Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title_full | Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title_fullStr | Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title_short | Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? |
title_sort | can you teach clinical communication virtually? |
topic | Rapid-Fire Presentations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345446/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT montgomeryadam canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT ramjanfaeez canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT cannonalistair canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT koharasae canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT saunderschloe canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT umasankardeekshitha canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT zacwilliamslois canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually AT butlersophie canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually |