Cargando…

Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?

AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montgomery, Adam, Ramjan, Faeez, Cannon, Alistair, Kohara, Sae, Saunders, Chloe, Umasankar, Deekshitha, Zac-Williams, Lois, Butler, Sophie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345446/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101
_version_ 1785073089939243008
author Montgomery, Adam
Ramjan, Faeez
Cannon, Alistair
Kohara, Sae
Saunders, Chloe
Umasankar, Deekshitha
Zac-Williams, Lois
Butler, Sophie
author_facet Montgomery, Adam
Ramjan, Faeez
Cannon, Alistair
Kohara, Sae
Saunders, Chloe
Umasankar, Deekshitha
Zac-Williams, Lois
Butler, Sophie
author_sort Montgomery, Adam
collection PubMed
description AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors and lived-experience practitioners, and consists of large-group teaching on a weekly topic, followed by small group simulations. A small-scale study was performed to evaluate whether conducting clinical communication teaching and simulation online was acceptable, effective and feasible. METHODS: Twelve students and ten faculty members participated in the online session, performing live clinical scenarios with simulated patients, over a two-hour period. Pre-and post-course questionnaires were designed with quantitative measures of confidence and qualitative questions about participants’ experience. Eight students completed both questionnaires. Questionnaire answers were analysed using a mixed-methods approach, with themes identified from the qualitative long answers, and statistical analysis of quantitative answers was also performed. RESULTS: Students found the session beneficial, with all indicating that they would sign up for a full online course. Based on answers to the quantitative questions, 50% of students felt more prepared for their clinical examinations. (p = 0.046). However, all participants noted a reduction in their ability to read non-verbal cues and body language. Returning students found they were less attentive during the session compared with the original face-to-face teaching (p = 0.05). Actors and faculty members found that the online course was feasible, acceptable and effective. However, most agreed that it was not preferable to teaching clinical communication skills face to face. Technological issues were minimal. CONCLUSION: The majority of students and faculty found the session both beneficial and enjoyable, but felt face to face sessions would be more helpful in teaching clinical communication. Student attentiveness and awareness of non-verbal cues were highlighted as concerns. However, students generally responded positively to the online course, particularly the quality and diversity of peer feedback. Teaching clinical communication virtually has the potential to be successful, and has implications for future undergraduate medical teaching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103454462023-07-15 Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually? Montgomery, Adam Ramjan, Faeez Cannon, Alistair Kohara, Sae Saunders, Chloe Umasankar, Deekshitha Zac-Williams, Lois Butler, Sophie BJPsych Open Rapid-Fire Presentations AIMS: An extracurricular clinical communication course called PsychED Up, with a focus on Psychiatry, met with challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associated social distancing requirements. The course is usually delivered face-to-face by a small team of doctors, medical students, actors and lived-experience practitioners, and consists of large-group teaching on a weekly topic, followed by small group simulations. A small-scale study was performed to evaluate whether conducting clinical communication teaching and simulation online was acceptable, effective and feasible. METHODS: Twelve students and ten faculty members participated in the online session, performing live clinical scenarios with simulated patients, over a two-hour period. Pre-and post-course questionnaires were designed with quantitative measures of confidence and qualitative questions about participants’ experience. Eight students completed both questionnaires. Questionnaire answers were analysed using a mixed-methods approach, with themes identified from the qualitative long answers, and statistical analysis of quantitative answers was also performed. RESULTS: Students found the session beneficial, with all indicating that they would sign up for a full online course. Based on answers to the quantitative questions, 50% of students felt more prepared for their clinical examinations. (p = 0.046). However, all participants noted a reduction in their ability to read non-verbal cues and body language. Returning students found they were less attentive during the session compared with the original face-to-face teaching (p = 0.05). Actors and faculty members found that the online course was feasible, acceptable and effective. However, most agreed that it was not preferable to teaching clinical communication skills face to face. Technological issues were minimal. CONCLUSION: The majority of students and faculty found the session both beneficial and enjoyable, but felt face to face sessions would be more helpful in teaching clinical communication. Student attentiveness and awareness of non-verbal cues were highlighted as concerns. However, students generally responded positively to the online course, particularly the quality and diversity of peer feedback. Teaching clinical communication virtually has the potential to be successful, and has implications for future undergraduate medical teaching. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345446/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
spellingShingle Rapid-Fire Presentations
Montgomery, Adam
Ramjan, Faeez
Cannon, Alistair
Kohara, Sae
Saunders, Chloe
Umasankar, Deekshitha
Zac-Williams, Lois
Butler, Sophie
Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title_full Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title_fullStr Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title_full_unstemmed Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title_short Can You Teach Clinical Communication Virtually?
title_sort can you teach clinical communication virtually?
topic Rapid-Fire Presentations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345446/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.101
work_keys_str_mv AT montgomeryadam canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT ramjanfaeez canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT cannonalistair canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT koharasae canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT saunderschloe canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT umasankardeekshitha canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT zacwilliamslois canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually
AT butlersophie canyouteachclinicalcommunicationvirtually