Cargando…
A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System
AIMS: An on-call email system was put in place to facilitate communication between wards and the on-call doctor, allowing prioritisation of duties according to green, amber and red tasks. Information regarding the patient, nature of request and clinical background are expected in the request form. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345456/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.473 |
_version_ | 1785073092306927616 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Aashna Ali, Mohamed Kishore, Satyam Dobson, Rachel Atewogboye, Oluwatosin |
author_facet | Singh, Aashna Ali, Mohamed Kishore, Satyam Dobson, Rachel Atewogboye, Oluwatosin |
author_sort | Singh, Aashna |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: An on-call email system was put in place to facilitate communication between wards and the on-call doctor, allowing prioritisation of duties according to green, amber and red tasks. Information regarding the patient, nature of request and clinical background are expected in the request form. The doctor is expected to respond to the email within 45 minutes. We completed a re-audit to compare if expected standards were reached in practice and attempt to find any areas of practice that could be improved. METHODS: We collected information on request forms, presence of adequate information and response time by reviewing the Teesside on-call email inbox. One day was randomly chosen from each week for a 24 month period and all emails were reviewed from chosen days. This amounted to (N=680) emails. The compliance was measured against local trust criteria with expected standard of 100%. We assessed four parameters of completion of request forms, providing adequate information including clinical information, patient identification and location, and response within 45 minutes by the doctor. RESULTS: The compliance in all four standards was subpar, with notable decrease in compliance from previous results. Compliance was less than 70% across all standards, where previously three standards were above this mark. There was a notable increase in requests with inappropriate tasks defined as non-urgent tasks as per trust guidelines. CONCLUSION: Better communication can be ensured with use of SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) in the request forms. Mutual sharing of information between doctors, nursing staff and administration with regard to appropriate written communication could constitute the base for structural change and improvement within the workplace. New staff members and doctors should be inducted with regards to the process of on-call email communication. Regular re-auditing and sharing of results is essential to the monitoring of change in compliance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10345456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103454562023-07-15 A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System Singh, Aashna Ali, Mohamed Kishore, Satyam Dobson, Rachel Atewogboye, Oluwatosin BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: An on-call email system was put in place to facilitate communication between wards and the on-call doctor, allowing prioritisation of duties according to green, amber and red tasks. Information regarding the patient, nature of request and clinical background are expected in the request form. The doctor is expected to respond to the email within 45 minutes. We completed a re-audit to compare if expected standards were reached in practice and attempt to find any areas of practice that could be improved. METHODS: We collected information on request forms, presence of adequate information and response time by reviewing the Teesside on-call email inbox. One day was randomly chosen from each week for a 24 month period and all emails were reviewed from chosen days. This amounted to (N=680) emails. The compliance was measured against local trust criteria with expected standard of 100%. We assessed four parameters of completion of request forms, providing adequate information including clinical information, patient identification and location, and response within 45 minutes by the doctor. RESULTS: The compliance in all four standards was subpar, with notable decrease in compliance from previous results. Compliance was less than 70% across all standards, where previously three standards were above this mark. There was a notable increase in requests with inappropriate tasks defined as non-urgent tasks as per trust guidelines. CONCLUSION: Better communication can be ensured with use of SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) in the request forms. Mutual sharing of information between doctors, nursing staff and administration with regard to appropriate written communication could constitute the base for structural change and improvement within the workplace. New staff members and doctors should be inducted with regards to the process of on-call email communication. Regular re-auditing and sharing of results is essential to the monitoring of change in compliance. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345456/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.473 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine. |
spellingShingle | Audit Singh, Aashna Ali, Mohamed Kishore, Satyam Dobson, Rachel Atewogboye, Oluwatosin A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title | A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title_full | A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title_fullStr | A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title_full_unstemmed | A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title_short | A Re-Audit of Teesside On-Call Email System |
title_sort | re-audit of teesside on-call email system |
topic | Audit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345456/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhaashna areauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT alimohamed areauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT kishoresatyam areauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT dobsonrachel areauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT atewogboyeoluwatosin areauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT singhaashna reauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT alimohamed reauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT kishoresatyam reauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT dobsonrachel reauditofteessideoncallemailsystem AT atewogboyeoluwatosin reauditofteessideoncallemailsystem |