A Service Evaluation and Improvement Project: Outcomes of Referrals From Prison to the Male Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) in Kent

AIMS: Aims: The project aims to evaluate the referrals from prison services for admission to our PICU from June 2020 to October 2021. Hypothesis: We expect referrals to come from multiple sources with variable timeframes for assessment. For those admitted to PICU, we expect delays in transfer out of PICU with increased PICU length of stay. We believe this to be secondary to lack of an established protocol for this pathway. Background: Our single 12 bedded male PICU in the trust has seen increased demands on its beds for prisoners requiring admission to mental health services. While PICU beds can meet the low secure requirements for prison transfers, they cannot function as forensic low secure beds due to their role within Acute services. With the increased number of referrals and the lack of a clearly defined pathway for these prison transfers, there was a risk of erosion of PICU philosophy aiming for discharge at the point when intensive care was not required, i.e increased length of stay. METHODS: Data were collected for all referrals from prison services to the male PICU between June 2020 and October 2021, recording the demographics, clinical information and timeframes for assessment. For those admitted to the PICU, percentage meeting the PICU criteria, admission-discharge pathways, serious untoward incidents and delays in transfer were recorded. RESULTS: There were 22 referrals from prisons, of which 11 (50%) were admitted to the male PICU. The referrals came from multiple sources with poor coordination between the PICU, forensic and prison services with delays in assessment. 100% of the admissions met criteria for PICU. There were 2 serious incidents related to security levels of the environment. The pathway out of PICU included prison, forensic services and acute wards. Over half the patients were downgraded to non-restricted detentions and stepped down to acute beds. There was a delay in transferring out of PICU in 36% of the patients leading to increased length of stay. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the data support our initial concerns that there is a need for a protocol guiding the transfer of prisoners to our PICU for treatment. This has led to discussions to develop such a protocol with close collaboration between prisons, forensic services and PICU. We hope this will lead to a much smoother process from having a single point of referral, timely assessments and decisions making, better defined exit pathways with less delays in transfer from PICU.