Improving the Quality of Valproate Prescribing in Adult Mental Health Services - POMH Topic 20b - Enhanced Community Rehabilitation Service (ECRS), Bognor Regis, West Sussex

AIMS:/BACKGROUND: The licensed indications for Sodium Valproate are narrow however the medication is commonly prescribed amongst mental health services in the UK. Such practice can be associated with ineffective and poorly tolerated treatment, especially given the limited evidence re efficacy of 'off label' use of Valproate. : Annual review of risk benefit balance for those on continued Valproate treatment to include asking about adverse effects, medication adherence and therapeutic benefit Any 'off label' prescription of Valproate, should be explained to the patient and documented. Clinician's reasons for initiating Valproate treatment should be documented in clinical records. Plasma level monitoring of Valproate treatment should not be used unless there is evidence of concerns about medication adherence, dose related side effects and/or ineffectiveness. Prior to initiating Valproate, the following should be documented in the clinical records: Full Blood Count (FBC), Liver Function Tests (LFTs) and Weight and/or BMI. Review within first three months of Valproate treatment should include: Screening for common side effects and assessment of the response of treatment. METHODS: Only 7 of 51 patients on the ECRS caseload were eligible for the study i.e. currently prescribed Valproate, irrespective of age. Audit forms provided by POMH team. Clinical records used to complete included all electronic/paper notes, letters, and other patient information available to clinical team. Due to nature of information required we involved doctors and nurses from the clinical team. RESULTS: 6/7 (86%) of patients had clinical reasoning for Valproate prescription documented in their clinical records - 5/7 (71%) were prescribed 'off-label' - mainly as adjunct for refractory Schizophrenia. 7/7 (100%) of patients had a documented review in the past year which included asking about adherence to their Valproate medication. 2/7 (29%) of patients had plasma monitoring of Valproate treatment in the past year as part of routine hospital admission blood tests. No evidence of concerns for the other patients documented otherwise. 5/7 (71%) had treatment initiated with Valproate more than 5 years ago, hence unable to see if prescription initiations were explained to patients due to lack of historical records. CONCLUSION: First cycle of this internal audit which forms part of a wider national prescribing audit, demonstrates that the ECRS team are generally meeting current standards for Valproate prescription. Despite the majority (71%) being initiated >5y ago - 86% of our patients have documented clinical reasons for ongoing prescription, with100% having a documented review in the past year.