Cargando…

Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults

The objective of the study was to assess the concordance and ranking ability of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener developed to assess the diet of young adults in Norway, ‘MyFoodMonth 1.1’, compared to a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data were collected in a cross-se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salvesen, Lorentz, Wills, Andrew K., Øverby, Nina C., Engeset, Dagrun, Medin, Anine C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.57
_version_ 1785073169410818048
author Salvesen, Lorentz
Wills, Andrew K.
Øverby, Nina C.
Engeset, Dagrun
Medin, Anine C.
author_facet Salvesen, Lorentz
Wills, Andrew K.
Øverby, Nina C.
Engeset, Dagrun
Medin, Anine C.
author_sort Salvesen, Lorentz
collection PubMed
description The objective of the study was to assess the concordance and ranking ability of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener developed to assess the diet of young adults in Norway, ‘MyFoodMonth 1.1’, compared to a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data were collected in a cross-sectional dietary survey evaluating the diets of students at the University of Agder, in southern Norway. The students were asked to complete both a dietary screener and an FFQ. Data collection was carried out from September to December 2020. Participants were first-year university students aged ≥18 years familiar with Scandinavian language. Almost half of the eligible sample (n 344) was excluded due to not completing the FFQ, compared to 1⋅7 % not completing the dietary screener, resulting in 172 (66 % female) participants with a median age of 21 years. For most items of the dietary screener (n 27/33, 82 %), all aspects of diet quality and components of the Diet Quality Score showed moderate-to-strong concordance with the FFQ evaluated using Kendall's tau-b analyses (t > 0⋅31), supported by visual inspection of box and whisker plots and descriptive ranking ability in a cross-tabulation. There was little evidence to suggest that concordance was dependent on sex. The concordance and ranking ability of ‘MyFoodMonth 1.1’ is considered satisfactory compared to a semi-quantitative FFQ. This rapid dietary assessment instrument presents a valuable addition to traditional instruments and a possible solution to recruit hard-to-reach parts of the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103457842023-07-15 Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults Salvesen, Lorentz Wills, Andrew K. Øverby, Nina C. Engeset, Dagrun Medin, Anine C. J Nutr Sci Research Article The objective of the study was to assess the concordance and ranking ability of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener developed to assess the diet of young adults in Norway, ‘MyFoodMonth 1.1’, compared to a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Data were collected in a cross-sectional dietary survey evaluating the diets of students at the University of Agder, in southern Norway. The students were asked to complete both a dietary screener and an FFQ. Data collection was carried out from September to December 2020. Participants were first-year university students aged ≥18 years familiar with Scandinavian language. Almost half of the eligible sample (n 344) was excluded due to not completing the FFQ, compared to 1⋅7 % not completing the dietary screener, resulting in 172 (66 % female) participants with a median age of 21 years. For most items of the dietary screener (n 27/33, 82 %), all aspects of diet quality and components of the Diet Quality Score showed moderate-to-strong concordance with the FFQ evaluated using Kendall's tau-b analyses (t > 0⋅31), supported by visual inspection of box and whisker plots and descriptive ranking ability in a cross-tabulation. There was little evidence to suggest that concordance was dependent on sex. The concordance and ranking ability of ‘MyFoodMonth 1.1’ is considered satisfactory compared to a semi-quantitative FFQ. This rapid dietary assessment instrument presents a valuable addition to traditional instruments and a possible solution to recruit hard-to-reach parts of the population. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10345784/ /pubmed/37457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.57 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salvesen, Lorentz
Wills, Andrew K.
Øverby, Nina C.
Engeset, Dagrun
Medin, Anine C.
Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title_full Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title_fullStr Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title_full_unstemmed Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title_short Relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
title_sort relative validity of a non-quantitative 33-item dietary screener with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire among young adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2023.57
work_keys_str_mv AT salvesenlorentz relativevalidityofanonquantitative33itemdietaryscreenerwithasemiquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongyoungadults
AT willsandrewk relativevalidityofanonquantitative33itemdietaryscreenerwithasemiquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongyoungadults
AT øverbyninac relativevalidityofanonquantitative33itemdietaryscreenerwithasemiquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongyoungadults
AT engesetdagrun relativevalidityofanonquantitative33itemdietaryscreenerwithasemiquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongyoungadults
AT medinaninec relativevalidityofanonquantitative33itemdietaryscreenerwithasemiquantitativefoodfrequencyquestionnaireamongyoungadults