Cargando…

Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers

AIMS: This study sought to elucidate the occupational health risk perception and psychological impact during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a general hospital in Singapore, and factors that influenced risk perception and psychological impact. METHODS: Healthcare wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Chau Sian, See, Brian, Liang Teo, David Choon, Qing Tan, Michelle Su, Hassan, Norasyikin, Tee, Augustine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.205
_version_ 1785073184221954048
author Lim, Chau Sian
See, Brian
Liang Teo, David Choon
Qing Tan, Michelle Su
Hassan, Norasyikin
Tee, Augustine
author_facet Lim, Chau Sian
See, Brian
Liang Teo, David Choon
Qing Tan, Michelle Su
Hassan, Norasyikin
Tee, Augustine
author_sort Lim, Chau Sian
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study sought to elucidate the occupational health risk perception and psychological impact during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a general hospital in Singapore, and factors that influenced risk perception and psychological impact. METHODS: Healthcare workers from a general hospital in Singapore were invited to participate in an online survey in June 2020. It posed questions on demographic and occupational information (age, gender, nationality, marital status, profession, working area, length of working experience in healthcare), 20 items on occupational health risk perception and psychological impact of COVID-19, and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The 20 items were adapted from a previous study during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak and designed to assess participants’ perceived exposure risk, risk acceptance, families’ perception, stigmatisation, feelings of appreciation, workload, and perceived effectiveness of workplace protective measures. Participants’ responses were obtained on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, disagree, strongly disagree). For data analysis, responses on occupational risk perception were regrouped into three levels. Depression, anxiety, and stress scores were categorised into quartiles. Ordinal logistics regression was used to compare the association of occupational risk perception with DASS-21 scores, and demographic factors with occupational risk perception. Variables that showed statistical significance (set at P <0.05) in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate ordinal logistics regression model to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: There were 1252 respondents (92 doctors, 661 nurses, 318 allied health professionals, 181 administrative and support personnel). 85% felt an increased risk of exposure to COVID-19 while 90% accepted the risk as part of their jobs. Stigmatisation against healthcare workers was present, with 45% reported they were shunned and 21% reported their families were avoided. 78% experienced increased workload. Fortunately, most (94%) found workplace protective measures adequate, and felt appreciated by their employer (87%) and society (81%). Increased perception of occupational health risk was significantly associated with nursing profession, workers in patient-facing areas, and staff with shortest working experience in healthcare. The mean DASS-21 scores were 9.2 (borderline normal) for Depression, 8.5 (borderline mild) for Anxiety, and 10.9 (normal) for Stress. Increased DASS-21 scores were significantly associated with greater occupational risk perception, younger age, and less years of working experience. CONCLUSION: Occupational risk perception amid the early COVID-19 pandemic is associated with adverse mental health among healthcare workers. Nurses, younger staff, and staff with least working experience are more vulnerable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10345860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-103458602023-07-15 Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers Lim, Chau Sian See, Brian Liang Teo, David Choon Qing Tan, Michelle Su Hassan, Norasyikin Tee, Augustine BJPsych Open Research AIMS: This study sought to elucidate the occupational health risk perception and psychological impact during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in a general hospital in Singapore, and factors that influenced risk perception and psychological impact. METHODS: Healthcare workers from a general hospital in Singapore were invited to participate in an online survey in June 2020. It posed questions on demographic and occupational information (age, gender, nationality, marital status, profession, working area, length of working experience in healthcare), 20 items on occupational health risk perception and psychological impact of COVID-19, and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The 20 items were adapted from a previous study during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak and designed to assess participants’ perceived exposure risk, risk acceptance, families’ perception, stigmatisation, feelings of appreciation, workload, and perceived effectiveness of workplace protective measures. Participants’ responses were obtained on a 6-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, disagree, strongly disagree). For data analysis, responses on occupational risk perception were regrouped into three levels. Depression, anxiety, and stress scores were categorised into quartiles. Ordinal logistics regression was used to compare the association of occupational risk perception with DASS-21 scores, and demographic factors with occupational risk perception. Variables that showed statistical significance (set at P <0.05) in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate ordinal logistics regression model to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: There were 1252 respondents (92 doctors, 661 nurses, 318 allied health professionals, 181 administrative and support personnel). 85% felt an increased risk of exposure to COVID-19 while 90% accepted the risk as part of their jobs. Stigmatisation against healthcare workers was present, with 45% reported they were shunned and 21% reported their families were avoided. 78% experienced increased workload. Fortunately, most (94%) found workplace protective measures adequate, and felt appreciated by their employer (87%) and society (81%). Increased perception of occupational health risk was significantly associated with nursing profession, workers in patient-facing areas, and staff with shortest working experience in healthcare. The mean DASS-21 scores were 9.2 (borderline normal) for Depression, 8.5 (borderline mild) for Anxiety, and 10.9 (normal) for Stress. Increased DASS-21 scores were significantly associated with greater occupational risk perception, younger age, and less years of working experience. CONCLUSION: Occupational risk perception amid the early COVID-19 pandemic is associated with adverse mental health among healthcare workers. Nurses, younger staff, and staff with least working experience are more vulnerable. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345860/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.205 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Chau Sian
See, Brian
Liang Teo, David Choon
Qing Tan, Michelle Su
Hassan, Norasyikin
Tee, Augustine
Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title_full Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title_fullStr Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title_full_unstemmed Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title_short Risk Perception and Psychosocial Impact During the Early Period of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare Workers
title_sort risk perception and psychosocial impact during the early period of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345860/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.205
work_keys_str_mv AT limchausian riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers
AT seebrian riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers
AT liangteodavidchoon riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers
AT qingtanmichellesu riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers
AT hassannorasyikin riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers
AT teeaugustine riskperceptionandpsychosocialimpactduringtheearlyperiodofthecovid19pandemiconhealthcareworkers