Cargando…
Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit
AIMS: The purpose of the audit was to assess the standard of communication to GPs from secondary mental health services and to ascertain whether the information included in letters to GPs was in accordance with the recommendations of RCPsych and PRSB. The audit cycle was completed by re auditing to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345878/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.449 |
_version_ | 1785073188269457408 |
---|---|
author | Mitu, Tajnin Zachariah, Vinila Ray, Jason Salmoiraghi, Alberto Singh, Ramandeep Williams, Laura Bhangu, Vikram Elsayed, Asmaa Ikuewumi, Opeyemi Gejdhar, Wamiqur Rehman Rezk, Amin Khan, Mohammad Rowley, Christopher Okhiai, Lopez |
author_facet | Mitu, Tajnin Zachariah, Vinila Ray, Jason Salmoiraghi, Alberto Singh, Ramandeep Williams, Laura Bhangu, Vikram Elsayed, Asmaa Ikuewumi, Opeyemi Gejdhar, Wamiqur Rehman Rezk, Amin Khan, Mohammad Rowley, Christopher Okhiai, Lopez |
author_sort | Mitu, Tajnin |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The purpose of the audit was to assess the standard of communication to GPs from secondary mental health services and to ascertain whether the information included in letters to GPs was in accordance with the recommendations of RCPsych and PRSB. The audit cycle was completed by re auditing to identify how the recommendations from the first audit has improved the quality of communication to GPs. METHODS: The audit was conducted on three psychiatric units, in three sites across Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and clinic letters were studied to identify whether the information was as per recommendations from: RCPsych and PRSB. The first audit used 121 letters in total from 3 sites, with the data being collected using audit proforma over a 2 week period from 04/04/22. The re audit looked at 69 letters with data collection using audit proforma over one week period from 19/12/22. RESULTS: Majority of letters sent to GP were lacking key information like details of Care coordinators ,medical comorbidities ,non psychiatric diagnosis, and actions for GP with this data missing in 91.7%, 61.22 %,79.59% and 71.43% respectively. Fill rates for other information like patients' details was 100% , psychiatric diagnosis was 83.47%, psychiatric medications , follow-up plan were 80.17%. The results of the re-audit most letters contained Psychiatric Diagnosis (97.1%, previous 83.5%), Psychiatric Medication (91.4%)previous 80.17%), and Follow Up Plan(98.6%, previous 80.2%). Many letters did not include information regarding Medical Comorbidity (28.6% vs 31.4% ), Non-Psychiatric Medication (65.7% vs 34.7%), Details of Care Co-ordinator (54.3% vs 8.3% ) and Action for GP (27.1%, vs 44.6%). CONCLUSION: The recommendations from first audit were to create local guidelines and templates with recommended headings for clinical letters, provide formal teaching for junior doctors and to re audit to see if the implemented changes has led to an improvement. The re-audit showed improvement since the introduction of the template in majority of headings in GP letters with decline in fill rate for 2 headings and these changes varied among three sites. Barriers identified affecting the overall outcome of the re audit were :template not being used, lack of training to juniors, and psychiatrist workload. In conclusion , we aim to re-distribute the template and increase awareness with informal teaching sessions, provide information on template during induction for doctors and organize training sessions on three sites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10345878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-103458782023-07-15 Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit Mitu, Tajnin Zachariah, Vinila Ray, Jason Salmoiraghi, Alberto Singh, Ramandeep Williams, Laura Bhangu, Vikram Elsayed, Asmaa Ikuewumi, Opeyemi Gejdhar, Wamiqur Rehman Rezk, Amin Khan, Mohammad Rowley, Christopher Okhiai, Lopez BJPsych Open Audit AIMS: The purpose of the audit was to assess the standard of communication to GPs from secondary mental health services and to ascertain whether the information included in letters to GPs was in accordance with the recommendations of RCPsych and PRSB. The audit cycle was completed by re auditing to identify how the recommendations from the first audit has improved the quality of communication to GPs. METHODS: The audit was conducted on three psychiatric units, in three sites across Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board and clinic letters were studied to identify whether the information was as per recommendations from: RCPsych and PRSB. The first audit used 121 letters in total from 3 sites, with the data being collected using audit proforma over a 2 week period from 04/04/22. The re audit looked at 69 letters with data collection using audit proforma over one week period from 19/12/22. RESULTS: Majority of letters sent to GP were lacking key information like details of Care coordinators ,medical comorbidities ,non psychiatric diagnosis, and actions for GP with this data missing in 91.7%, 61.22 %,79.59% and 71.43% respectively. Fill rates for other information like patients' details was 100% , psychiatric diagnosis was 83.47%, psychiatric medications , follow-up plan were 80.17%. The results of the re-audit most letters contained Psychiatric Diagnosis (97.1%, previous 83.5%), Psychiatric Medication (91.4%)previous 80.17%), and Follow Up Plan(98.6%, previous 80.2%). Many letters did not include information regarding Medical Comorbidity (28.6% vs 31.4% ), Non-Psychiatric Medication (65.7% vs 34.7%), Details of Care Co-ordinator (54.3% vs 8.3% ) and Action for GP (27.1%, vs 44.6%). CONCLUSION: The recommendations from first audit were to create local guidelines and templates with recommended headings for clinical letters, provide formal teaching for junior doctors and to re audit to see if the implemented changes has led to an improvement. The re-audit showed improvement since the introduction of the template in majority of headings in GP letters with decline in fill rate for 2 headings and these changes varied among three sites. Barriers identified affecting the overall outcome of the re audit were :template not being used, lack of training to juniors, and psychiatrist workload. In conclusion , we aim to re-distribute the template and increase awareness with informal teaching sessions, provide information on template during induction for doctors and organize training sessions on three sites. Cambridge University Press 2023-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10345878/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.449 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This does not need to be placed under each abstract, just each page is fine. |
spellingShingle | Audit Mitu, Tajnin Zachariah, Vinila Ray, Jason Salmoiraghi, Alberto Singh, Ramandeep Williams, Laura Bhangu, Vikram Elsayed, Asmaa Ikuewumi, Opeyemi Gejdhar, Wamiqur Rehman Rezk, Amin Khan, Mohammad Rowley, Christopher Okhiai, Lopez Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title | Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title_full | Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title_fullStr | Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title_full_unstemmed | Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title_short | Secondary Service Communications to GPs-a Regional Audit |
title_sort | secondary service communications to gps-a regional audit |
topic | Audit |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10345878/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitutajnin secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT zachariahvinila secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT rayjason secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT salmoiraghialberto secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT singhramandeep secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT williamslaura secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT bhanguvikram secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT elsayedasmaa secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT ikuewumiopeyemi secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT gejdharwamiqurrehman secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT rezkamin secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT khanmohammad secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT rowleychristopher secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit AT okhiailopez secondaryservicecommunicationstogpsaregionalaudit |